![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 867
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
I AM SPARTACUS! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
![]() |
I'm not talking about Palestine - my own view is that, since both Jews and Palestines are genetically the descendants of the children of Israel, that there should be a two-state solution. However, it's not my problem or my fight, and it's between them. I only care about Europe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,036
![]() |
'For England' -
I don't know exactly what Churchill said about atheistic Jews, but I expect if he did write or say something on the subject then it was carefully considered before he wrote/said it. I am not sure whether what he wrote/said was published at the time or were private thoughts only released after his death? In any case, it would be much more helpful if you quoted Churchill's actual words, so that we can evaluate what he did actually write/say. We certainly have Churchill's views on Islam - or Mohammedanism as it used more accurately to be called. Here they are, verbatim: QUOTE "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. "The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. "The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property (either as a child, a wife, or a concubine) must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. "Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. "Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science‹the science against which it had vainly struggled‹the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome." UNQUOTE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,036
![]() |
tara wrote of the Jews: "These devilish hypocritical parasites leave a trail of destruction everywhere they go with their greed and deception..."
REPLY: Unacceptable langauge. Reported in the complaints section ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 164
![]() |
Quote:
What is there to complain and whinge about? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
![]() |
The references can be found in Anthony Sutton's Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution:
Appendix II: THE JEWISH-CONSPIRACY THEORY OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION Sutton, whose works are very informative in my opinion, rejects Churchill's view, and the idea of a Jewish conspiracy. For my own part, I have reserved judgement till I know more, though I certainly would be inclined to give Sutton a fair hearing. However I did want to draw attention to Churchill because it illustrates that the Jews were seen as a very destabilising influence upon western civilization by mainstream conservatives who were neither Nazi nor Muslim. Jews have, as a collective group, exercised far too much influence upon Europe, and this is the reason for the grievances against them - it is not a blind, irrational thing: the only question is whether it is misguided or not. Similar quotes could be provided from Martin Luther, George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Mark Twain, Napoleon, Richard Wagner, H.G. Wells - really people should know this before assigning the cause to 'ignorance' in true pc fashion. These kinds of thoughts used to be standard enough that one even finds them quite unapologetically in the works of Dickens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,036
![]() |
Imperium wrote: "If you want to understand why people hate Jews then you should acquaint yourself with the Old Testament, in particular the story of how Joseph fleeced Pharaoh and the people of Egypt. The Jews have been behaving this way ever since!"
++++++++++ REPLY: Um, Imperium, before you start urging people to 'acquaint themselves with the Old Testament', might I respectfully suggest you might benefit from a re-reading of parts of Genesis yourself? Basically, Joseph wisely advised the Pharaoh to store up grain etc. during seven years of plenty. That meant that when seven years' famine struck the Middle East and North Africa, the Pharaoh was able to meet his people's needs - and those from lands beyond. His father Jacob and his children (who many years earlier had left him in a pit for dead and brought back a blood-stained coat to their father saying that a bear had killed him) were so desperate that they had to migrate to Egypt to avoid starvation. There they were helped with free grain and provisions by Jospeh, who meantime had been deservedly promoted by the Pharaohs to no less a position than Prime Minister of Egypt. His father and brothers didn't recognise him at first. When he eventually told them that he was their long-lost son and brother, it led to emotional reunion scenes, with Joseph sobbing so loud that the whole of the Pharoah's palace could hear him (Genesis 45 v 2). Earlier, the handsome Joseph distinguished himself by resisting the provocative advances of the wife of Egyptian potentate Potiphar, leading to the world's first recorded instance of a woman falsely crying 'rape'. On suspicion that the woman's accusation was true he was thrown into a dungeon for two years (Genesis 39). Joseph was held in such esteem by the Egyptian nation and its leaders that he had a state funeral and Joseph was allowed to be buried back in his homeland. And the Jews were allowed to settle in eastern Egypt (Goshen), where they remained for 400 years until the Exodus. If you can fault Joseph at any point after he was unceremoniously bundled into a pit and abandoned for dead, please supply the Biblical reference. If you can't, please fully reconsider your remarks both about Joseph in particular and about the Jews in general... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,036
![]() |
'For England' wrote: "...since both Jews and Palestinians are genetically the descendants of the children of Israel..."
REPLY: No. Israel was the new name given by God to Jacob when he was 64 years of age. From then on he was known as 'Israel', as were his descendants - until later times when Judah became most prominent tribe (after the 10 northern tribes were exiled to Assyria) and then they gradually became known as 'Jews'. The Palestinians do not descend ftom Israel/Jacob. Nor do the Palestinians descend from Jacob's father Isaac. Isaac was one of two half-brothers. The Arabs and Palestinians descend from Isaac's half-brother Ishmael. The Israelites/Jews descend from Isaac -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]