Word 'Terrorism' Offensive To Muslims; Renamed.

TannyD · 18-04-2008, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Guvnah

Not till we have a government with balls and an electorate similarly equipped

Well we have the power of the vote and there's plenty of books and information around...

Baron von Lotsov · 18-04-2008, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 22ANDUK

Ministers have adopted a new language for declarations on Islamic terrorism.
In future, fanatics will be referred to as pursuing 'Anti-Islamic Activity'. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said that extremists were behaving contrary to their faith, rather than acting in the name of Islam. Security officials believe that directly linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.

Government renames Islamic terrorism as 'anti-Islamic activity' to woo Muslims | the Daily Mail

I think if you reverse everything said there you would be closer to the truth. Religion is one thing but what they do is pure brainwashing, and so they get easily offended. This is the plan of course, to build up an ever more radical cult under the guise of religious freedom and tolerance.

It is an attack on this country and to find who is responsible one must seek out the brainwashers and find out whom they are working for. I'm sure it will link back ultimately to our government. I know the Muslim council donates heavily to Nu Labour so seek and you will ultimately find out who why where and what. It's not a coincidence, that's for certain.

The Guvnah · 19-04-2008, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TannyD

Well if we all vote for the party that ticks most of those boxes (UKIP?) then it might happen.

You can hope...

Nice try Tanny but as yet UKIP aren't ticking enough of my boxes I'm afraid. Where do nulab dig these women up from? Harman, Jowell, Smith, Kelly, Blears et al; they all seem to fit the same template, borg-like, condescending in the extreme, unpleasant merely to listen to, hectoring, dismissive of all the establshed facts and promoted way beyond their ability.

Little Englander (sour) · 19-04-2008, 04:26 PM

I think it was Peter Mandelson that first called the IRA terrorists "dissidents" (persons who oppose official policy), but this was after they had laid down, sorry up, their weapons.

Hartlepool · 19-04-2008, 05:32 PM

I will always remember that it was Bliar and New Labour who negotiated with the Terrorists of the IRA,and also,that Paisley sold the Unionists out to the IRA,then retired with his stash.

Bliar,Paisley,Adams and Mc Guinness,traitors all.

a swansong 4 europe · 19-04-2008, 08:22 PM

If Islamic terrorism is to be renamed "anti-Islamic activity", then will pro-islamic activity be renamed as "anti-Christian activity"? The two religions are not compatable, so why bother pretending to have something called 'dialogue', it is just another word for surrender.

I find pro-active Islamic activity offensive, but I do not find Islam itself offensive, simply the belief that I should accommodate it within the boundaries of my motherland as an equal to any other long established beliefs.

HighlandFP · 20-04-2008, 05:35 AM

When are youse English going to get it into yer heeds that Islamic terrorisim is funded by your Government and the usOFa?

The Bear · 20-04-2008, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighlandFP

When are youse English going to get it into yer heeds that Islamic terrorisim is funded by your Government and the usOFa?

Never, because it isn't.

Rebirth · 20-04-2008, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hartlepool

I will always remember that it was Bliar and New Labour who negotiated with the Terrorists of the IRA,and also,that Paisley sold the Unionists out to the IRA,then retired with his stash.

Bliar,Paisley,Adams and Mc Guinness,traitors all.

Wasn't it Guinness that said he once wanted to kill British soldiers?

Hartlepool · 20-04-2008, 01:22 PM

Well,he has shown the desire to do so over many years,hasn't he?.

19-04-2008, 04:26 PM	#14 (permalink)
Little Englander (sour) Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Portsmouth Posts: 765 Party: English Democrats	I think it was Peter Mandelson that first called the IRA terrorists "dissidents" (persons who oppose official policy), but this was after they had laid down, sorry up, their weapons. __________________ Little Englander (bigoted)

20-04-2008, 05:35 AM	#17 (permalink)
HighlandFP Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Ross-shire Highlands SCOTLAND Posts: 586 Party: Other	When are youse English going to get it into yer heeds that Islamic terrorisim is funded by your Government and the usOFa? __________________ WARNING: By reading or downloading this post you may be committing an offence under some or all of these Terrorism Acts. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/securit...m-and-the-law/ EU = Ein Volk ~ Ein Reich.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

19-04-2008, 05:32 PM	#15 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,605 Party: Free England Party	I will always remember that it was Bliar and New Labour who negotiated with the Terrorists of the IRA,and also,that Paisley sold the Unionists out to the IRA,then retired with his stash. Bliar,Paisley,Adams and Mc Guinness,traitors all.

19-04-2008, 08:22 PM	#16 (permalink)
a swansong 4 europe Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 411	If Islamic terrorism is to be renamed "anti-Islamic activity", then will pro-islamic activity be renamed as "anti-Christian activity"? The two religions are not compatable, so why bother pretending to have something called 'dialogue', it is just another word for surrender. I find pro-active Islamic activity offensive, but I do not find Islam itself offensive, simply the belief that I should accommodate it within the boundaries of my motherland as an equal to any other long established beliefs.

20-04-2008, 01:22 PM	#20 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,605 Party: Free England Party	Well,he has shown the desire to do so over many years,hasn't he?.