won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly

mkpdavies · 27-11-2007, 01:15 PM

Then go and have a read of this.

National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) - April 1974

Quote:

<H3>POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS - Index

Quote:

26. There is no single approach which will "solve" the population problem. The complex social and economic factors involved call for a comprehensive strategy with both bilateral and multilateral elements. At the same time actions and programs must be tailored to specific countries and groups. Above all, LDCs themselves must play the most important role to achieve success.

27. Coordination among the bilateral donors and multilateral organizations is vital to any effort to moderate population growth. Each kind of effort will be needed for worldwide results.
28. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:

(a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and
(b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.

</H3>
That sounds like the end of freedom to me. Read the whole report and then ask yourself why all the control systems are being put in place now are for a reason.

Finaly, if you don't like abortion, best not read the next bit.

Quote:

<H3>Abortion is vital to the solution: - Index

Quote:

"While the agencies participating in this study have no specific recommendations to propose on abortion, the following issues are believed important and should be considered in the context of a global population strategy...Certain facts about abortion need to be appreciated:
" -- No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion". [Page 182]
" -- Indeed, abortion, legal and illegal, now has become the most widespread fertility control method in use in the world today." [Page 183]
" -- It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the following reasons: 1) The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2) Widespread lack of safe abortion techniques..." [Page 185]

</H3>

See. We are seen as a virus by our masters.

rjt · 27-11-2007, 01:22 PM

Too late I have read it, I think most on this forum will know what I think of it.

kernow · 27-11-2007, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgrabham

"I killed my own baby to be nice to he environment"

We let people like that walk the sreets???

Never a truer word! She should have abstained from sex completely then there would have been no chance of getting pregnant and then deciding to have an abortion to "Save the Planet"!

jgrabham · 27-11-2007, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernow

Never a truer word! She should have abstained from sex completely then there would have been no chance of getting pregnant and then deciding to have an abortion to "Save the Planet"!

Perhaps I should make a banner... "Al Gore kills babies".

John Carter · 28-11-2007, 09:53 AM

Quote:

actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.

Well there's an easy one - stop giving my money away to chavs. The population would soon drop if Tracy and Sandra realised that they weren't gonna get handouts for every mini-thug they pop out.

Interesting, isn't it? Socialists cause the overpopulation problem by their actions (child benefit, foreign aid, etc.) and then introduce the solution which best fits their control-freakery. Planned all along, I reckon.

John Carter · 28-11-2007, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernow

She should have abstained from sex completely then there would have been no chance of getting pregnant

I like to call this "pro-choice" - choice whether to keep her knickers on or not. Makes the lefties annoyed when you steal one of their catch-phrases and redefine it.

rjt · 28-11-2007, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Carter

I like to call this "pro-choice" - choice whether to keep her knickers on or not. Makes the lefties annoyed when you steal one of their catch-phrases and redefine it.

But it is indeed pro choice, she had the very choice you state, and if she chooses to remove them then she should consider carefully the possible consequences.

allanon · 28-11-2007, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Carter

Well there's an easy one - stop giving my money away to chavs. The population would soon drop if Tracy and Sandra realised that they weren't gonna get handouts for every mini-thug they pop out.

Interesting, isn't it? Socialists cause the overpopulation problem by their actions (child benefit, foreign aid, etc.) and then introduce the solution which best fits their control-freakery. Planned all along, I reckon.

Interesting link with this thread.

Forget Climate Change or any other supposed disaster scenario. The real threat to any civilisation is moral bankruptcy.

John Carter · 28-11-2007, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by allanon

Interesting link with this thread.

I hadn't noticed that thread. Comments in there.

PolishUser · 28-11-2007, 03:06 PM

All environmentalist organisations should be banned.

27-11-2007, 01:22 PM	#12 (permalink)
rjt Uber Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Aldershot Posts: 5,488	Too late I have read it, I think most on this forum will know what I think of it. __________________ Mr Delors said that he wanted the European Parliament to be the democratic body of the community, The Commission to be The Executive and The Council Of Ministers The Senate. NO! NO! NO! (Margaret Thatcher 30 Oct 1990) Ignore List: The Prophets of ST Al the Unelectable.

28-11-2007, 03:06 PM	#20 (permalink)
PolishUser Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 334	All environmentalist organisations should be banned. __________________ A vote for the Labour Party or the SNP is a vote for the Argentine police state.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode