![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 892
![]() |
Quote:
It's an utter certainty, given the level of homoginsation going on, and it will be sooner rather than later |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Reading
Posts: 580
![]() |
Quote:
It is not an EU organisation and it does not get any public funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
The fact people like Huhne, Kinnock etc back it though, means it has very strong links if nothing else.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kent
Posts: 892
![]() |
Quote:
Although they say the are unbiased politically, they certainly go with the EU flow: Quote:
Quote:
It is true that we suffer from two systems........ but why did metrication get halted if it was oh so good for us..? I'm all for efficiency and ease of use........ but do not appreciate change for changes sake. I can see benefits in retaining the unique imperial systems we still had/have...and would rather go back to a workable system, instead of more homoginisation |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,237
![]() |
We don't suffer from having two systems, we benefit. We are the only country in Europe which can deal with two systems and has a choice (when permitted).
We suffer from a government that is trying to outlaw one system and its self-appointed mouth-pieces, such as the BBC in particular, which insist on using one system (i.e. metric) regardless of suitability or public desire. It is not the dual system that is causing the problem, it is the attitude of the government and its supporters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,012
![]() |
A late response from a newbie here.
As an engineer, I do pretty well all* calculations in metric (SI) units and, like many, I can see the merits of of its simple relationships and generally easier conversion factors. But I have yet to see a single convincing argument that would justify the £800,000,000 or so it would cost to change UK road signs to metric. For all practical purposes the actual units are irrelevant as long as they are uniform and consistently applied. *If I want to buy say, some copper bar, it should be a matter for me to agree with my supplier what units I want to use. If I wanted to extend an old system made to Imperial dimensions I would HAVE to use Imperial. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
Well said. I haven't got anything really against metric. Sometimes I use it, some times I use imperial, depending on which one I feel like. I still weigh myself in stones, I buy my grapes in pounds and I drive in miles (unless I'm abroad). I measure my room in CM's though and choice is what it's all about.
Spending that kind of money for zero real benefit would be a digrace and the fact Kinnockio backs it should be and alarm for everyone! Do we really want every country to be the same as all the others? Part of the fun of a holiday is to get away from it all and do things differently. I like having different money to spend, different measurements, different customs and ways of doing things. The world is becoming a greyer place by the day.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,012
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]