GLW Data Base Poll

Niall Warry · 24-08-2008, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob FM

Independent UKIP, a very concise account of what transpires on this forum. If one looks at the current poll results and ignore those not on his list (lucky people) then 72% didn't consent.

So now what Bob FM ??

Who really cares??

Just use your delete button!

Bob FM · 24-08-2008, 10:51 AM

You clearly did because you agreed with GC's call for me to be banned. Now what nothing, it just goes to show that GLW imposes he views on people and as per his own letter posted by Spon, he is Judge, Jury and executioner. GLW's law or no law. And you admire him.

SponPlague · 24-08-2008, 11:25 AM

Bob, it could be deemed that PPC's have chosen to raise their heads above the parapet. If people don't like what they see and take email potshots...

Bob FM · 24-08-2008, 11:55 AM

Spon, it was GLW who commenced this war of words back in May I merely responded. Would you like me to copy mail everything he's sent to me, it will keep you reading for several months (No I wouldn't inflict that on anyone)

kernow · 24-08-2008, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob FM

How many people on the Forum Consented to being included in Greg Lance-Watkins Data Base.

I certainly didn't! I delete them as soon as they appear!

SponPlague · 24-08-2008, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob FM

Would you like me to copy mail everything he's sent to me, it will keep you reading for several months (No I wouldn't inflict that on anyone)

Thank you for your kind offer to assist me in wallpapering the flat I'm buying, but I'l take a rain check on that

Geoffrey Collier · 24-08-2008, 01:19 PM

BobFM: I don't want you banned, I merely want you disallowed from dedicating a thread, on someone elses forum, the purpose of which is the denigration of another person. This should apply to all 'posters', who wish to engage in that activity. I am not talking about any particular individual, the issue must be the civilised tone of the forum. There could also be, under certain circumstances, legal implications, and liabilities, resulting from what you wish to do.

Carry on posting, BobFM, but don't monopolise a thread intending to harm others, for that is orchestrating aggression.

C_steam · 24-08-2008, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geoffrey Collier

BobFM: I don't want you banned, I merely want you disallowed from dedicating a thread, on someone elses forum, the purpose of which is the denigration of another person.

Carry on posting, BobFM, but don't monopolise a thread intending to harm others, for that is orchestrating aggression.

Agreed. Thread locked.

View Poll Results: Who Gave Consent to be included in GLW's Email Data Base
Yes	3	18.75%
No	8	50.00%
Not on it	5	31.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

24-08-2008, 10:51 AM	#82 (permalink)
Bob FM Uber Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: South Marston Swindon Posts: 2,150	You clearly did because you agreed with GC's call for me to be banned. Now what nothing, it just goes to show that GLW imposes he views on people and as per his own letter posted by Spon, he is Judge, Jury and executioner. GLW's law or no law. And you admire him.

24-08-2008, 11:25 AM	#83 (permalink)
SponPlague Uber Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Zurich Posts: 3,400	Bob, it could be deemed that PPC's have chosen to raise their heads above the parapet. If people don't like what they see and take email potshots...

24-08-2008, 11:55 AM	#84 (permalink)
Bob FM Uber Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: South Marston Swindon Posts: 2,150	Spon, it was GLW who commenced this war of words back in May I merely responded. Would you like me to copy mail everything he's sent to me, it will keep you reading for several months (No I wouldn't inflict that on anyone)

24-08-2008, 01:19 PM	#87 (permalink)
Geoffrey Collier Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,323	BobFM: I don't want you banned, I merely want you disallowed from dedicating a thread, on someone elses forum, the purpose of which is the denigration of another person. This should apply to all 'posters', who wish to engage in that activity. I am not talking about any particular individual, the issue must be the civilised tone of the forum. There could also be, under certain circumstances, legal implications, and liabilities, resulting from what you wish to do. Carry on posting, BobFM, but don't monopolise a thread intending to harm others, for that is orchestrating aggression.