![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#111 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Marston Swindon
Posts: 2,150
![]() |
I have no need to do as you suggest, I already have that assurance. Swindon is very much seen as a test of how well UKIP can do, which is why I am standing in South Swindon, rather than North Swindon, Rob is considered the weaker candidate. There will be no deal, so perhaps to use the vernacular 'put up or shut up'. Oh and by the way there is an L in vulnerable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,323
![]() |
BobFM: From whom have you been given that assurance concerning Swindon? Was it approved by the NEC or an individual assurance? Others would be interested in the facts in order that it can be identified as a precedent. Are you stating that that assurance exists in documentary form: letter, minutes, etc?
Yes, sorry for the typing error; and there is certainly an 'L' where you are going. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]