gremlin in the works

Another MP with his snout in the trough.[/quote]

aaaaggghhh thoughs parasites might as well grow 6 legs and get it over and done with too go along with their fat like cockroach bodys or more to the point they might as well become a god dam flea becouse they love sucking the life out of us and bleeding us dry!!!!!!!..........end of rant

__________________
William Pitt the younger “Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it; and this I know, my lords, that where laws end, tyranny begins”

gimlet

Here are the times that Mr Spink has voted both ways:

30 Jun 2008 Opposition Day — 16th Allotted Day — Food Security - UKIP
2 Jun 2008 Orders of the Day — Clause 13 — Nationally significant infrastructure projects: general UKIP
7 May 2008 Opposition Day — [11th Allotted Day-First Part] — Civil Service UKIP
7 May 2008 Opposition Day — [11th Allotted Day-First Part] — Civil Service UKIP
23 Apr 2008 Opposition Day — [10th Allotted Day] — Family Doctor Services UKIP
4 Mar 2008 Orders of the Day — European Union (Amendment) Bill Con
9 Jan 2008 Orders of the Day — Hatred on the grounds of sexual orientation Con
7 Mar 2007 Composition Option 5 (60 per Cent. Elected) Con
1 Nov 2006 September Sittings Con
18 Nov 2004 Hunting Bill Con
18 Nov 2004 Hunting Bill Con

Alex McKee

We really need to get him voting the UKIP way on things.

__________________

Anything I post on this web forum is my personal opinion only.

Users on Ignore list: None.

harryaldridge

Not as simple as that. The amendment was labelled as cleaning up the sloppy and overly generous disgrace which exists. That does not mean what was proposed was desirable in itself, merely that it had been portrayed as such. One should not vote for bad legislation just because the image or perception of doing so is good. That i surely worse.

Bob Spink voted both ways, as many MPs do, to mark an active abstention or disagreement. He didn't vote in support, and he didn't not bother to vote. He actively objected for some reason.

__________________
http://vindicovindico.blogspot.com

blueblood1920

Maybe he objects to MP's voting on the matter?

Niall Warry

And how are you going to do that Alex?

It is now apparent to me at least that Bob Spink is a waste of time.

komerad

The following part letter copied from "Eurofacts" 4th July ' 08

David Davis by resigning his seat on a point of principle


Following the rejection of the Lisbon Treaty by the sensible people of Ireland, by a very large majority, our Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary have both declared that the UnitedKingdom will ratify the Lisbon Treaty..Does this not now present an irresistible opportunity for Dr Bob Spink - UKIP MP for Castle Point - to resign his Westminster seat, as a matter of principle, to stand as the only candidate offering to take the UK out of the European Union? He would not lack for opponents as the three main

parties would hasten to name their candidates. The UKIP leadership should encourage Dr Spink to follow the brave action of David Davis,for if their candidate actually won a seat at Westminster a precedent would have been established.

DAVID OWEN

Alex McKee

It is perfectly obvious that Bob Spink fell out with his local association and was deselected. He joined us because he already felt he had much in common with us but also because he wants our support and finance for his re-election campaign in 2010.

If he discusses things thoroughly with the party before voting contrary to our established views, we will have time to prepare a statement explaining why.

If he agrees to do this (and honours that) then we increase the amount of resources available to his campaign in 2010. [Carrot]

If he is totally unwilling to co-operate with us properly and simply wants our money and foot soldiers for 2010 then we would be well rid of him. [Stick]

__________________

Anything I post on this web forum is my personal opinion only.

Users on Ignore list: None.

Hartlepool

Damn it,he's a LIB-DEM.