British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU, Euroscepticism and European reformism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2008, 07:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 23,154
Britannist has some supporters
Default Nigel Dodds MP, DUP, Government, detention vote

"It was in the national interest that we vote with the Government on this measure to increase rules on detention from 28 days to 42 days" Nigel Dodds MP, Deputy Leader of the eurosceptic Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), just said on Channel Four Television News. Mr. Dodds added "We voted against 90 days' detention but voted for this."
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 11-06-2008, 07:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 23,154
Britannist has some supporters
Default Europhile Liberal 'Democrat' Clegg, Labour, Mr. Austin Mitchell MP, anti-EU

Quote:
Europhile Liberal 'Democrat' party leader 'Nick' Clegg said - according to the Sky News website: (Quote) ...it was a "sad day" for traditional British liberties. (End of quote)
He is no position to talk - his party has long backed the eradication of many of our liberties through the transfer of UK sovereign powers to the EU.

Quote:
The Sky News website also reports how anti-EU Labour MP Mr. Austin Mitchell allegedly voted this evening on 42 days' detention: (Quote) But Labour backbencher Austin Mitchell said he had intended to vote against 42 days, but changed his mind and backed the Government in order to "save Gordon Brown for the nation.” The Sky News website also quoted Mr. Mitchell as stating: "I support him (Prime Minister Gordon Brown) and I think he would be on his way out if he had been defeated on this." (End of quote)
From:

42-Day Terror Detention: Government Win Vote |Sky News|Politics
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 07:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,315
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Allen View Post
UKIP are opposed to increased detention times. Bob Spink may disagree with this position. You cannot interpret his every vote as reflecting party policy.
I completely understand what you are saying, but it is pretty hard to defend that position given that he represents 100% of the UKIP vote in Parliament. Surely his opinion is the UKIP position in every meaningful sense?

He is effectively the party's leader in the Commons, chief whip of himself and the sole representative of UKIP.

While he may be in favour of EU withdrawal, protection of civil liberties is also a core tenet of UKIP political philosophy in so much as it exists. Spink seems to have challenged that today.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled!
Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 08:24 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,299
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Allen View Post
UKIP are opposed to increased detention times. Bob Spink may disagree with this position. You cannot interpret his every vote as reflecting party policy.
Then he should be kicked out of the party like the piece of dirt that he is.
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 09:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 575
Richard Allen is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher View Post
I completely understand what you are saying, but it is pretty hard to defend that position given that he represents 100% of the UKIP vote in Parliament. Surely his opinion is the UKIP position in every meaningful sense?

He is effectively the party's leader in the Commons, chief whip of himself and the sole representative of UKIP.

While he may be in favour of EU withdrawal, protection of civil liberties is also a core tenet of UKIP political philosophy in so much as it exists. Spink seems to have challenged that today.
While I also understand your point you surly cannot accept that whatever Spink believes on any given subject is by default the official UKIP position.
Richard Allen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 09:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 949
Party: English Democrats
Little Englander (sour) is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Maybe someone will remind me as to how marvelous it was when Spink jumped ship leaving, in the lurch, those that voted for him. How will UKIP hierarchy square the circle between "Party" policy and the voting antics it's Parliamentry Party or doesn't the vote for 42 days detention without trial actually determine UKIP "policy". What a tangled web ...
__________________
Little Englander (bigoted)
Little Englander (sour) is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 10:33 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 423
stathan is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Englander (sour) View Post
Maybe someone will remind me as to how marvelous it was when Spink jumped ship leaving, in the lurch, those that voted for him. How will UKIP hierarchy square the circle between "Party" policy and the voting antics it's Parliamentry Party or doesn't the vote for 42 days detention without trial actually determine UKIP "policy". What a tangled web ...



Spink said on radio this afternoon that he would be voting with the government, I would suggest that surely one of the tenets of being in UKIP is that we are individual thinkers who vote as we wish on many issues rather than being a bunch of sheep like the members of other parties.


I am torn on this one, I have no problem with suspected terrorists being investigated and held for that length of time, however knowing our police and government they will, and already have abused the cuurrent anti terror laws many times for purposes that they were never intended for.

In short they cannot be trusted on this issue!


If it's any consolation 69% of the British public support the 42 days so Bob's vote does in fact reflect public opinion.
stathan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 10:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 23,154
Britannist has some supporters
Default How MPs voted, Counter-Terrorism Bill, Mr. Bob Spink, Ann Widdecombe, Unionist

The list of how MPs voted in this evening's division in the House of Commons on the Counter-Terrorism Bill (i.e. on extending 28 days' detention to 42 days' detention) has now been published and it is confirmed that UKIP Mr. Bob Spink and Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe voted with the Labour Government (i.e. in favour of 42 days' detention if it has to be used) - as did the eurosceptic Democratic and Ulster Unionist parties.

The above-mentioned parties and MPs combined added 12 votes to the Government side and the Government won the vote at 6.19 pm this evening with a majority of 9.

The list of how MPs voted can be found here (please click on the following link and scroll down the page):

Hansard - Commons | Houses of Parliament

Last edited by Britannist; 11-06-2008 at 10:37 PM.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 10:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
Earthling's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 292
Party: UKIP
Earthling is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Earthling
Default

I now wait for all those people who love to express their hatred of UKIP to gloat.

At the end of the day, it is not a mirror reflection of UKIP policy, just like the Labour rebels and Conservatives who supported the government. Just because he is the only UKIP MP in the commons does not mean he should support every UKIP policy, it is through no fault of his own that he is the only UKIP member

The bottom line is we need more MPs
__________________
Earthling's Blog

Don't let EU rule Britannia! Vote UKIP and say NO to Brussels Bureaucracy.
Earthling is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2008, 10:59 PM   #20 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 23,154
Britannist has some supporters
Default DUP, anti-EU, UKIP, Mr. Spink, Government

As I wrote earlier in this thread at the end of posting five - one thing the vote on the Counter-Terrorism Bill at 6.19 pm this evening shows is the influence small anti-EU parties such as the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) and UKIP can have if the Government's majority is small or non-existent.

If UKIP MP Mr. Spink had voted against the Government and if the nine DUP MPs had also voted against the Government Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown would have lost the vote at 6.19 pm today.
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
42 Day Detention, Bob Spink, UKIP

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0