![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: A good result for UKIP in London? | |||
| Excellent |
|
2 | 5.00% |
| Good |
|
0 | 0% |
| Indifferent |
|
3 | 7.50% |
| Poor |
|
7 | 17.50% |
| Terrible |
|
28 | 70.00% |
| Don't Know/Care |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 8
![]() |
Quote:
- The figure for the constituency seats actually fell from exactly 10% in 2004; - The figure for the London-wide additional members was actually just 1.9% this time. It was on this latter figure that we fell to 9th place - yes, ninth - behind the Christian Alliance, Respect and Abolish the Congestion Charge. It is also the figure which paints the truer London-wide picture, because we were one of just seven parties to stand for all fourteen individual constituency seats (though the Christian Alliance stood in thirteen). Respect and the BNP both stood for just one individual constituency seat. I am very upset by these results. I only clicked "terrible" on your survey because you didn't have an option marked "catastrophic" and, no getting away from it, these results are catastrophic. We always knew that we were helped in '04 by the London elections being on the same day as the Euro elections, but that does not explain such a huge fall. I think it is worth comparing this year's results with 2000 as well as 2004 and they are even more telling: - In 2000, we achieved a marginally better figure (exactly 1%) in the mayoral election than we did in 2008 (0.9%). - In 2000, we also achieved a marginally better figure (exactly 2%) in the additional member vote for the assembly than we did in 2008 (1.9%). What this means to me is that we have squandered the great opportunity we created in 2004, not only to the extent that we are now back where we started before those elections, but to the extent that we are struggling to match where we were as a little-known party eight years ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 9,414
Party: None
![]() |
Quote:
I had assumed that the additional seats were calculated from the remains of the constituency votes. 3% in the constituency votes, which I presume is a measure of actual UKIP support is about what we expected. It is marginally higher than the General Election result. Given that there are far more parties available to vote for, I don't think it is that bad a result. It's poor because of the previous result (10% according to your number), but not wholly unexpected given the different circumstances. As for the Mayoral vote... that really was abysmal.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled! Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 9,414
Party: None
![]() |
Quote:
Either one would take an almighty swing to UKIP, especially because there will be less MEP seats available next time.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled! Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 373
Party: UKIP
![]() |
While I agree that our London performance was disappointing, I just have this feeling that with Nigel leading us, we are going to absolutely smash the ball out of the stratosphere next year and make British political history in the European Elections.
The Tories have already shot themselves in the foot by p****** off a lot of their members with an unashamedly biased selection system that gave vast preference to female and pro-EU candidates. I know a few Tories as well who are incredibly disgruntled with the Cameron's broken promise in regards to the EPP group in the EU Parliament. This is only going to add to the number of part-time UKIP voters we attracted in 2004. What you have to remember as well is that eurosceptic Tory members in the Party have fewer and fewer reasons to stick around now. Hannan and Helmer, yeah, okay, and a handful of MP's too, but Bob Spink coming over to us will certainly give us more credibility in their eyes. Spink was well respected among the anti-EU Tory collective. Question UKIP's 'single issue' status all you like, but when it comes to the EU issues, UKIP are the ONLY show in town for informed eurorealists (the number's of which are increasing, from the conversations I have). I’m going to go out on a limb and say….UKIP come away with 21 MEP’s, with a view to beating the Tories in the EU election after that.
__________________
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something".
Last edited by Michael Heaver; 04-05-2008 at 07:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nr Birmingham
Posts: 1,158
Party: UKIP
![]() |
And either way this is becoming our last chance to get joe and jane public to wake up and realise that their freedoms are fast slipping away!.
__________________
RULE BRITANNIA BRITANNIA RULES THE WAVES, BRITONS NEVER EVER SHALL BE SLAVE'S. Never give in - never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Winston Churchill. When Labour won the 1997 General Election, Enoch Powell told his wife that the electorate had voted to break up the United Kingdom. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]