![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,688
Party: Libertarian Party
![]() |
Quote:
This article is quite informative: Ifs and Butts: Germany Bans Smoking, Sort Of - International - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News
__________________
Anyone who supports 42 days pre-charge detention should read this: 42-day detention: the threat to our liberty | John Major - Times Online and this: Why David Davis is right to make a stand | Mail Online |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,601
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: nottinghanshire
Posts: 526
![]() |
Quote:
I'm with M Davies. This is fascism. I don't like the way some people yell fascist all the time but think about it. Legal activity, consenting adults, no right of admitance......government bans it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,054
Party: UKIP
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
We’re not just about Europe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,112
![]() |
The law also applies to private clubs. That is clearly wrong. It doesn't apply to any bars in the Palace of Westminster.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do. "I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,688
Party: Libertarian Party
![]() |
Indeed. Such a deep intrusion into private property rights, not to mention the high level of communist-style hypocrisy is disgusting in a 'free country'.
__________________
Anyone who supports 42 days pre-charge detention should read this: 42-day detention: the threat to our liberty | John Major - Times Online and this: Why David Davis is right to make a stand | Mail Online |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,601
![]() |
I know you and I will always disagree over the smoking ban , but try looking at it another way. If there is no smoking in a pub, the smoker can have his /her drink in the pub and go outside for a cig'( in my local there is an overhang outside where they can drink and smoke) If on the other hand you are a non smoker who can't stand smoke, having a drink in a pub pre smoking ban was for them at least not very pleasant. So you could say they were discriminated against!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Marston Swindon
Posts: 518
![]() |
Simply put this is the number one reason sighted. So remove the smoke, and in so doing the minaicule, scientifically irrelevant toxins and heh presto everyone one is happy. All pubs/clubs and for that matter 90% of places of employment are private places. How can having a policy of providing choice in a democracy be a vote loser, surely that is an Oxymoron. Democracy is choice. Smoking bans deny the choice of 14 million people and their 10 million tolerant no smoking friends. Non anti smokers do have choices if a pub/club displays smoking signs then the choice is not to enter.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| Ashley Mote, Benefit Fraud, Passive Smoking, Smoking, Smoking ban |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and FuzzFizz
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]