If Nigel gave up...

Independent UKIP · 04-07-2008, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ex-member

I understand that just to make sure the leadership are stirring up trouble for Gerard Batten in London and running other candidates against him. The hustings are this weekend.
Why? Not because Batten wants to be leader-he does not- but because he is seen as honest and principled and a man available when the leadership finally self destructs.

As the London hustings are not taking place this weekend I think your post is of no value to this debate.

Bob FM · 05-07-2008, 09:10 AM

Strange how the detractors get so many facts wrong.

HULKMAN · 05-07-2008, 11:39 AM

Pot calling the kettle black. BobFm You are going to end up with egg on your face very soon!

Bob FM · 05-07-2008, 11:43 AM

I shan't be holding my breath.

HULKMAN · 05-07-2008, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob FM

I shan't be holding my breath.

HA, HA, HA

Akebono · 01-08-2008, 11:27 AM

Yes - I think this needs to be considered.

progcon.org · 01-08-2008, 06:11 PM

"Richard Ski would be good."

Lol. Just p1ssed myself laughing.

michael mcgough · 01-08-2008, 06:49 PM

I want Mr Y as leader------probity,probity la la la .land

"Further to our telephone conversation I should like to confirm that after company X
was sold in 2000 to Mr Y no annual
accounts were filed with Companies Registry,xxxx. One Form 371 was
filed in 2002 and a Form 296 was filed by Mr Y and the Company
Secretary Mr Z.
In February 2004 the Registry was informed that the company was going into
liquidation.

Unfortunately I regret to inform you that Companies Registry did not persue
the company for annual accounts or annual returns during the period 2000 -
2004.

I am sorry I could not be of more help.

Regards
MISS A
Companies Registry

Geoffrey Collier · 01-08-2008, 09:06 PM

michael mcgough: We all comprehend the statement as literally explained; what is the tendentious message that you are endeavouring to convey? Without such help your efforts are in vain.

Much of the revenue raised by the Ashford Call Centre was notional capital. For what goods and services we received is not very apparent. Much involved advertising, printing
and rent. The money transferred to Ashford Employment Ltd, by contrast, was actual, real, and substantial. Have you made similar inquiries to ensure that all was well on that occasion.

Are there any national bank statement still being sent to private addresses? You must find these things so distressing, should that be the case, Mr McGough. I believe that a forensic audit could help UKIP to discover the real truth. Have, for example, people of unconventional trading practices ever been involve in UKIP's financial affairs. You make accounting seem such an exciting profession; you must be very clever. Please continue to inform us of all you know. It could result in visits from governmernt agencies; I understand that they are avid readers of this forum.

michael mcgough · 02-08-2008, 12:15 AM

"you must be very clever."
Sadly Mr Collier I am but a fool compared to you.
I must advise that the message I wish to convey is that one Government agency failed to do their job,BUT ---- there may be a reason for same.Perhaps another Government agency was involved---who knows? .

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-07-2008, 09:10 AM	#92 (permalink)
Bob FM Uber Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: South Marston Swindon Posts: 2,148	Strange how the detractors get so many facts wrong.

05-07-2008, 11:39 AM	#93 (permalink)
HULKMAN Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 92	Pot calling the kettle black. BobFm You are going to end up with egg on your face very soon!

05-07-2008, 11:43 AM	#94 (permalink)
Bob FM Uber Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: South Marston Swindon Posts: 2,148	I shan't be holding my breath.

01-08-2008, 11:27 AM	#96 (permalink)
Akebono Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 138	Yes - I think this needs to be considered.

01-08-2008, 06:11 PM	#97 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	"Richard Ski would be good." Lol. Just p1ssed myself laughing.

01-08-2008, 06:49 PM	#98 (permalink)
michael mcgough Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Essex Posts: 1,248	I want Mr Y as leader------probity,probity la la la .land "Further to our telephone conversation I should like to confirm that after company X was sold in 2000 to Mr Y no annual accounts were filed with Companies Registry,xxxx. One Form 371 was filed in 2002 and a Form 296 was filed by Mr Y and the Company Secretary Mr Z. In February 2004 the Registry was informed that the company was going into liquidation. Unfortunately I regret to inform you that Companies Registry did not persue the company for annual accounts or annual returns during the period 2000 - 2004. I am sorry I could not be of more help. Regards MISS A Companies Registry

01-08-2008, 09:06 PM	#99 (permalink)
Geoffrey Collier Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,323	michael mcgough: We all comprehend the statement as literally explained; what is the tendentious message that you are endeavouring to convey? Without such help your efforts are in vain. Much of the revenue raised by the Ashford Call Centre was notional capital. For what goods and services we received is not very apparent. Much involved advertising, printing and rent. The money transferred to Ashford Employment Ltd, by contrast, was actual, real, and substantial. Have you made similar inquiries to ensure that all was well on that occasion. Are there any national bank statement still being sent to private addresses? You must find these things so distressing, should that be the case, Mr McGough. I believe that a forensic audit could help UKIP to discover the real truth. Have, for example, people of unconventional trading practices ever been involve in UKIP's financial affairs. You make accounting seem such an exciting profession; you must be very clever. Please continue to inform us of all you know. It could result in visits from governmernt agencies; I understand that they are avid readers of this forum.

02-08-2008, 12:15 AM	#100 (permalink)
michael mcgough Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Essex Posts: 1,248	"you must be very clever." Sadly Mr Collier I am but a fool compared to you. I must advise that the message I wish to convey is that one Government agency failed to do their job,BUT ---- there may be a reason for same.Perhaps another Government agency was involved---who knows? .