UKIP: Future is nuclear, says UKIP

eublues · 05-03-2008, 09:29 AM

My understanding (limited) is that all private companies want to get on with financing and building nuclear capacity in Britain is the permission/licences to do so (permission and regulation is in the gift of governments).

Anthony Butcher · 05-03-2008, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by douglas denny

I have'nt just said money isn't a problem with my previous post, (which it isn't), I also said government can raise the money by bonds or taxation in that posting, which I note you have completely ignored.

Not ignored, I am just not sure of the relevance. I would never even consider supporting/voting for a policy that is uncosted, especially one on such a huge scale. I understand that UKIP doesn't have access to specific financial information; I would only expect some realistic ball-park numbers and a comparison to the alternatives.

How much more expensive/cheaper is this than the current government plans?

05-03-2008, 09:29 AM	#21 (permalink)
eublues Uber Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 3,196	My understanding (limited) is that all private companies want to get on with financing and building nuclear capacity in Britain is the permission/licences to do so (permission and regulation is in the gift of governments). Last edited by eublues; 05-03-2008 at 09:39 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode