British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU, Euroscepticism and European reformism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
View Poll Results: Piers Merchant's letter about the Portuguese police...
Good 7 46.67%
Adequate 3 20.00%
Poor 5 33.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-11-2008, 01:10 PM   #21 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Marston Swindon
Posts: 2,169
Bob FM is just starting out
Default

Britain cannot arrest as a British crime, they can arrest on behalf of another state within the EU. Not what he stated.
Bob FM is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 20-11-2008, 01:11 PM   #22 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Web Cam behind your screen - Smile
Posts: 838
Greg Lance-Watkins is just starting out
Default EU Arrest Warrant AND Coroners Courts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob FM View Post
I am unaware that either Doctor has been arrested or charged for this undeniable crime under British law. Not being in Britain your post is irrelevant.
Hi,

the irrefutable existence of the EUropean Arrest warrant not withstanding I believe that Coroners Courts of British citizens killed abroad are conducted under British law in Britain. That child and parents were British they can be arrested under British law for a crime shown to have been committed on a British citizen from the Coroner's Courts - Believe.

Are you for a moment claiming that morally they should be permitted to avoid justice for having committed their crime in a foreign country?

I think NOT.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
Greg Lance-Watkins is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2008, 01:15 PM   #23 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Marston Swindon
Posts: 2,169
Bob FM is just starting out
Default

Morally or not, the Jurisdiction for a criminal offence is in another country.
Bob FM is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2008, 01:19 PM   #24 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Marston Swindon
Posts: 2,169
Bob FM is just starting out
Default

In 1992, the same coroner's court, Oxford, returned verdicts of unlawful killing in the case of nine British soldiers killed by US "friendly fire" during the first Gulf War.

Lawyer Mark Stephens represented the families of those killed.

Oxford assistant deputy coroner Andrew Walker
Coroner Andrew Walker referred the case to the attorney general

"In that case, the coroner did not send the papers to the DPP or the attorney general because those responsible for the deaths were outside the jurisdiction.

BBC News
Bob FM is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2008, 01:20 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Charlemagne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,593
Charlemagne is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob FM View Post
Morally or not, the Jurisdiction for a criminal offence is in another country.
Just for once it would be nice if you and GLW could actually agree on something. You are like a bickering old married couple, constantly chastising each other. Instead of always sniping at each other, why don't you find out what you both have in common!

You never know. This could be the beginning of something beautiful!
Charlemagne is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2008, 01:23 PM   #26 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Marston Swindon
Posts: 2,169
Bob FM is just starting out
Default

Charlemagne, please note his comment he did what he always does. Posts something which contextually would seem to authorative and then adds the word 'believe'.
Bob FM is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2008, 02:06 PM   #27 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
SponPlague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,401
SponPlague is just starting out
Default

Greg is right, Bob: If you die abroad, and your body is brought back, there is a Coroner's court held here:

Coroners, post-mortems and inquests : Directgov - Government, citizens and rights

Quote:
Coroners hold inquests in these circumstances even if the death occurred abroad (and the body is returned to Britain). If a body is lost (usually at sea) a coroner can hold an inquest by order of the Secretary of State if death is likely to have occurred in or near a coroner's area of jurisdiction.
SponPlague is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2008, 03:02 PM   #28 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Web Cam behind your screen - Smile
Posts: 838
Greg Lance-Watkins is just starting out
Default I believe!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob FM View Post
In 1992, the same coroner's court, Oxford, returned verdicts of unlawful killing in the case of nine British soldiers killed by US "friendly fire" during the first Gulf War.

Lawyer Mark Stephens represented the families of those killed.

Oxford assistant deputy coroner Andrew Walker
Coroner Andrew Walker referred the case to the attorney general

"In that case, the coroner did not send the papers to the DPP or the attorney general because those responsible for the deaths were outside the jurisdiction.

BBC News
Hi,

as far as I can see - you seem to confirm my point. Thus the Doctors McCann were in British juristiction although the offence may not have been.

Or so I understand your point to be.

In passing the word 'believe' is exactly what it means - I stated the facts as I understood them and said 'I believe', how would you rather I stated the facts in the light of the fact that I am not 'advised' legally by a Barrister.

Regards,
Greg L-W.
Greg Lance-Watkins is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0