British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31-07-2007, 07:57 AM   #21 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Millennium3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 3,865
Millennium3 is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Anything that has Nation in it's title is doomed to failure in England. England has been done up like a kipper and it's people are no lobger interested in anyhting to do with nationhood.

I suggest the name, "Free Benefits For All" or "Zero Responsibility".
I have also argued in another thread 'why no outrage - TAA' that the fight has gone out of the people, as you suggest. There needs to be a single cause to which the majority subscribe - if it is not already too late!
Millennium3 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 31-07-2007, 08:43 AM   #22 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 87
John Doe is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Millennium3 View Post
I have also argued in another thread 'why no outrage - TAA' that the fight has gone out of the people, as you suggest. There needs to be a single cause to which the majority subscribe - if it is not already too late!
The anti-EU vote, if we are thinking of people who vote wholly or mainly on that issue, is extremely limited. People vote on a variety of factors (whether rational or otherwise - probably mostly the latter).

In my view, trying to campaign on a single cause is very good for motivating activists (the ones who are concerned with that issue above all else) but is bound to fail in electoral terms.

It would also mean bringing together people with diametrically opposed views. For example, those who believe in free trade and those who believe in protectionism have entirely different goals with respect to the EU, even though they may nominally both be inside the "anti-EU movement" (if it is even a movement).
John Doe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 12:41 AM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
FredSucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,941
FredSucks is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

John Doe Wrote:-

"I think the Democratic Party is a strongly anti-EU party formed by people who split from UKIP at some point, though others may know more about the details."

Yes there is a Party Called the Democratic Party, run by Geoff Southall, however it has only ever contested ONE election, that was in London, Chelsea I think.

Certainly their London Activist Leo Brookes, left to join the English Democrats and is now the English Democrats London Chairman.

The Democratic Party, recieved a donation of circa £200,000 and spent it all on a court case to try to get the UK out of the EU through the English Courts.

Hardly a "Strong" party !
FredSucks is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:54 AM   #24 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 87
John Doe is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentishman View Post
John Doe Wrote:-

"I think the Democratic Party is a strongly anti-EU party formed by people who split from UKIP at some point, though others may know more about the details."

Yes there is a Party Called the Democratic Party, run by Geoff Southall, however it has only ever contested ONE election, that was in London, Chelsea I think.

Certainly their London Activist Leo Brookes, left to join the English Democrats and is now the English Democrats London Chairman.

The Democratic Party, recieved a donation of circa £200,000 and spent it all on a court case to try to get the UK out of the EU through the English Courts.

Hardly a "Strong" party !
Thank you Kentishman. My main point was of course to establish that it may not be possible (going back to the subject of the thread) to have a party named British Democrats since there is already a Democratic Party registered.

You mention that Leo Brookes is your London Chairman, but I thought Andrew Constantine on this forum said he was London Chairman. Have I got that wrong?
John Doe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:49 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 855
Party: Free England Party
Andrew Constantine is an unknown quantity at this point
Default British Democrats ... sounds better than you know what

I think the name is better than UKIP. Why not speak to this party's officials and see if they like UKIP? If they do, UKIP might wish to ask its members whether they would like to move to the new name? In future, "new UKIP" might want to put these sorts of major proposals to the membership - having the word "democrat" in your new name will require you to have the occasional nod in the general direction of democracy!

And as for Leo Brookes ... he is the very hard working and able Secretary to the London Area for the English Democrats. We couldn't do without him, so no, you cannot have him back!

Andrew Constantine
Andrew Constantine is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:08 PM   #26 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 190
ukipteen is just starting out
Default

I feel that the name British Democrats is a wise and media friendly name. It is simple and easy to understand who we are and what we believe in. I feel that someone should seriously suggest this name to the NEC and try to instigate a referendum in the party.
ukipteen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:22 PM   #27 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ukipteen View Post
I feel that the name British Democrats is a wise and media friendly name. It is simple and easy to understand who we are and what we believe in. I feel that someone should seriously suggest this name to the NEC and try to instigate a referendum in the party.
That is true, but it is also seems a little cliche. It isn't exactly original.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:31 PM   #28 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 190
ukipteen is just starting out
Default

True, but its far better than the old 1990's image we still posses.
ukipteen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 08:39 PM   #29 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Indeed it is. But I think if we are going for a name change it should be something radical, yet sound like it belongs in the heart of British politics.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2007, 09:13 PM   #30 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 156
sean43 is just starting out
Default

Who could put it to the NEC and get a vote by members. UKIP talk about promoting referendums and direct democracy - lets start here. Maybe the party could go somewhere, it needs a big change before the next election if it is to win any seats. A name change and fresh ideas could bring people like myself and others to join.
sean43 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0