Hereward77

I seem to remember it was Charles who cheated on Diana, not the other way around. Charles wanted to marry Camilla all along, but she was married to Parker-Bowles, so he used Diana to provide the heirs.

__________________
"The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history."
David Rockefeller, New York Times, August 10, 1973

mkpdavies

Still more than UKIP have achieved in less time.

The Referendum party even had a name that would have seen it develop into a direct democracy party. Untainted by all of the baggage UKIP has managed to attract, it would probably have had a number of seats now with the finacial clout of Goldsmith.

Sadly his treacherous little oik of a son obviously doesn't think much of his Dad and is now a candidate for the party his Dad came to despise.

__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

g hall

When England first had a monarch quite often they were elected by the Witan the choice being who would lead best and the hereditary principle may have played a little part but if you inherited you had to prove yourself or be removed.
I,m afraid the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha line should be removed as recently they've done very little for this country and it's people

__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."

tammy_cat

mkpdavies says:

I have to agree, although personally I wouldn't put it as strongly as that. The Queen is definitely a traitor, as one of her most important roles is to ensure that the UK rules itself and does not accept laws from foreign powers. This is stated in the Act of Supremacy 1559:

http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/Documen...supremacy2.htm

I do not understand why the Queen is ignoring the Act of Supremacy. She has been petitioned by many people, including the peers, to stop the government and to take us out of the EU, but she hasn't done anything.

rjt

Both cheated if I recall, I hope you are not a member of the circle of Diana.

rjt

I am so sorry but that is riddiculous how can the queen take us out of the EU we are in it due to the democratically expressed wish of the peoples representatives in Parlaiment in 1972, we futher expressed that wisha as a nation in 1975 in a referendum, we endorsed the Thatcher Government in 1987 aftyer it had signed the SEA we endorsed the major Government in 1992after it expresely stated that it intended to enact the Masstricht treaty. And we endorsed the Blair government in 2001 after it signed the Treaty of Amsterdam.

Every time a government has taken the decision to further intergrate us into Europe in recent years the British people, the ueens subjects have endorsed that decision by re-electing the government. In the case of the Heath government the folloiwng WIlison government put the question to the people and they supported Heaths decision.

I dont like it but the fact is that the British people, the queens subjects consistantley put a Europhile govenrment in on her behalf.

SO the queen should go against the democratically expressed preferenace of her people should she.

rjt

I think you will find that the queen just has a little less power than the monarch had in 1559, and remmebr the government would say it is enacting British Law which is what we do when parlaiment ratifys a treaty we make it valid for the people of this country other coutrys do the same.

Hartlepool

rjt,you a Lib-Dem now?

rjt

No I would never support any party that beleives in our membership of the EU

Hartlepool

Thats good.