EXTENDING THE ROLE OF REGIONAL ASSEMBLIES

mkpdavies · 30-11-2006, 03:28 PM

The day a party makes policy over what is good for their party, over what is good for Britain, is the day it becomes a party that doesn't deserve any support.

Hartlepool · 30-11-2006, 03:38 PM

He was reflecting on past events in UKIP,and maybe,giving his ideas on the RAs BY comparing then,to now,with hindsight.

We do it every day,nothing wrong in that.

Little Englander (sour) · 01-12-2006, 05:18 PM

I thought that UKIP was anti- Europe, do you not know that "regionalisation" is a pet project of the Euromafia. Portsmouth is already in the Arc Manche according to the latest EU map, is someone trying to sell a pup?

mkpdavies · 01-12-2006, 05:22 PM

UKIP is anti EU, not anti-Europe. Being against the continent you are part of would be a bit thick.

I agree with being pro Regionalisation, while being under the EUs rule would be foolish to say the least. It would be helping the EU complete it's mission.

Thankfully the leaders of UKIP understood this and fought and fight against regionalisation all the time.

I can't think of any party dumb enough to want to help break the UK up as planned by the EU and traitors like Blair and Mandelson.

No wait, I can think of one.

Little Englander (sour) · 01-12-2006, 05:26 PM

Damn!

Colin McNamee · 01-12-2006, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

.............I agree with being pro Regionalisation, while being under the EUs rule would be foolish to say the least. It would be helping the EU complete it's mission.

Thankfully the leaders of UKIP understood this and fought and fight against regionalisation all the time.

I can't think of any party dumb enough to want to help break the UK up as planned by the EU and traitors like Blair and Mandelson.

No wait, I can think of one.

:? :?

mkpdavies · 01-12-2006, 06:34 PM

What's :? about that?

Hartlepool · 01-12-2006, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin McNamee

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

.............I agree with being pro Regionalisation, while being under the EUs rule would be foolish to say the least. It would be helping the EU complete it's mission.

Thankfully the leaders of UKIP understood this and fought and fight against regionalisation all the time.

I can't think of any party dumb enough to want to help break the UK up as planned by the EU and traitors like Blair and Mandelson.

No wait, I can think of one.

:? :?

ME TOO. :?

mkpdavies · 01-12-2006, 06:46 PM

Will someone explain to me what is :? about thinking it to be foolish being pro regions while part of the EU.

Are you guys saying it isn't foolish.

:shock:

Hartlepool · 01-12-2006, 07:14 PM

Matt,you changed the whole meaning because the comma was after "Regionalisation"when it should have been after"foolish".

30-11-2006, 03:28 PM	#21 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,053 Party: Libertarian Party	The day a party makes policy over what is good for their party, over what is good for Britain, is the day it becomes a party that doesn't deserve any support. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

01-12-2006, 05:22 PM	#24 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,053 Party: Libertarian Party	UKIP is anti EU, not anti-Europe. Being against the continent you are part of would be a bit thick. I agree with being pro Regionalisation, while being under the EUs rule would be foolish to say the least. It would be helping the EU complete it's mission. Thankfully the leaders of UKIP understood this and fought and fight against regionalisation all the time. I can't think of any party dumb enough to want to help break the UK up as planned by the EU and traitors like Blair and Mandelson. No wait, I can think of one. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

01-12-2006, 06:34 PM	#27 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,053 Party: Libertarian Party	What's :? about that? __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

01-12-2006, 06:46 PM	#29 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,053 Party: Libertarian Party	Will someone explain to me what is :? about thinking it to be foolish being pro regions while part of the EU. Are you guys saying it isn't foolish. :shock: __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

30-11-2006, 03:38 PM	#22 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,814 Party: Popular Democrats	He was reflecting on past events in UKIP,and maybe,giving his ideas on the RAs BY comparing then,to now,with hindsight. We do it every day,nothing wrong in that.

01-12-2006, 05:18 PM	#23 (permalink)
Little Englander (sour) Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Portsmouth Posts: 949 Party: English Democrats	I thought that UKIP was anti- Europe, do you not know that "regionalisation" is a pet project of the Euromafia. Portsmouth is already in the Arc Manche according to the latest EU map, is someone trying to sell a pup?

01-12-2006, 05:26 PM	#25 (permalink)
Little Englander (sour) Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Portsmouth Posts: 949 Party: English Democrats	Damn!

01-12-2006, 07:14 PM	#30 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,814 Party: Popular Democrats	Matt,you changed the whole meaning because the comma was after "Regionalisation"when it should have been after"foolish".