17 Doughty Street

BASILDON BOY · 26-12-2006, 10:58 PM

Please find examples where I have promoted the BNP or the tories?

Please find examples of my advice or directions that are false?

Do not banter child like and immature jibes - Its most unbecoming and they just make you look very cheap.

Look forward to the examples with links.

Percentage · 27-12-2006, 08:50 AM

Now come on boys,cut out the insults!

I didnt raise this conundrum for the sake of it,nor did i do so lightly as there are some serious points that it raises however if it had been an isolated case i probably would have just left it & watched the Co-habitation & development of the two forums with fascination & intrigue.

Hartlepool,my dear friend your involvement in this discussion interests me greatly as you yourself took a stance which went against the trend of the forum & indeed took some unfair flack because of it,being a northerner of course you could handle yourself & might i be allowed the opinion,that since the election youve gone a bit over the top with the "celebrations",mind you elections evoke passion & no real harm done.

In your case though there at least was some dialogue that could give the reader the all important clues as to why you felt the need to act as you did & chose DCB as your favoured leadership candidate.

After doing some searches to try to gauge why Matt has done a U-turn i come across a brick wall (apart from the odd compliment on a couple of Chads recent innovative gimmicks),maybe some posts have been removed (i dont follow as intently as i used too),but from past form change seems to come easily to matt.

I remember a couple of threads entitled "mkp over & out" &"The End of an Error" where Matt himself decides that the forum is not for him & makes a quite long-winded ta-ta to all.http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/view...t=cap+tips+pub
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/view...ight=end+error

However 3 days later the man unkindly dubbed Matt "20 posts a day" Davies by another forum returns,citing a need for a "fix" from the PC.

Add to this resignations from UKIP (only to return after being inspired by a single edition of Independence news) & flirtations with the Liberal party enough to warrant there avatar to his name,& a pattern soon begins to emerge.

So what? You could say,afterall its all down to the individual & of course you'd be correct.

There are however a couple of serious side issues,the first the most important,that as writers & the givers of political opinion from all sides of the floor,we are very quick to cease on any backing down of policy or principle by politicians,as indeed we are to accuse them of being on gravy trains or profiteering from there careerist positions & selling out the people,but how can we really do that if we sell out our own very words so ridiculously cheaply?

Secondly all of us are great exponents of using the internet to advance politics into the mainstream of the people & we have all met negative counternance from politicians,just this year at conferance NF was acknowledging the huge appetite there is in this medium but it didn't stop him denegrating the image of the individual behind the PC as someone following a "hobby" or gloating the fact "he goes down the pub".If politicians are to ever take seriously the efforts of the internet viewpoint then consistency & accountability to what has been written must be done with strict dilligence!

Otherwise less is better,eh?

Hartlepool · 27-12-2006, 02:26 PM

Percentage,thanks for your posting on this,your points and remarks are noted.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

26-12-2006, 10:58 PM	#31 (permalink)
BASILDON BOY Uber Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: N'Djamena, Chad Posts: 2,063	Please find examples where I have promoted the BNP or the tories? Please find examples of my advice or directions that are false? Do not banter child like and immature jibes - Its most unbecoming and they just make you look very cheap. Look forward to the examples with links.

27-12-2006, 08:50 AM	#32 (permalink)
Percentage Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: N.Ireland Posts: 1,729	Now come on boys,cut out the insults! I didnt raise this conundrum for the sake of it,nor did i do so lightly as there are some serious points that it raises however if it had been an isolated case i probably would have just left it & watched the Co-habitation & development of the two forums with fascination & intrigue. Hartlepool,my dear friend your involvement in this discussion interests me greatly as you yourself took a stance which went against the trend of the forum & indeed took some unfair flack because of it,being a northerner of course you could handle yourself & might i be allowed the opinion,that since the election youve gone a bit over the top with the "celebrations",mind you elections evoke passion & no real harm done. In your case though there at least was some dialogue that could give the reader the all important clues as to why you felt the need to act as you did & chose DCB as your favoured leadership candidate. After doing some searches to try to gauge why Matt has done a U-turn i come across a brick wall (apart from the odd compliment on a couple of Chads recent innovative gimmicks),maybe some posts have been removed (i dont follow as intently as i used too),but from past form change seems to come easily to matt. I remember a couple of threads entitled "mkp over & out" &"The End of an Error" where Matt himself decides that the forum is not for him & makes a quite long-winded ta-ta to all.http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/view...t=cap+tips+pub http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/view...ight=end+error However 3 days later the man unkindly dubbed Matt "20 posts a day" Davies by another forum returns,citing a need for a "fix" from the PC. Add to this resignations from UKIP (only to return after being inspired by a single edition of Independence news) & flirtations with the Liberal party enough to warrant there avatar to his name,& a pattern soon begins to emerge. So what? You could say,afterall its all down to the individual & of course you'd be correct. There are however a couple of serious side issues,the first the most important,that as writers & the givers of political opinion from all sides of the floor,we are very quick to cease on any backing down of policy or principle by politicians,as indeed we are to accuse them of being on gravy trains or profiteering from there careerist positions & selling out the people,but how can we really do that if we sell out our own very words so ridiculously cheaply? Secondly all of us are great exponents of using the internet to advance politics into the mainstream of the people & we have all met negative counternance from politicians,just this year at conferance NF was acknowledging the huge appetite there is in this medium but it didn't stop him denegrating the image of the individual behind the PC as someone following a "hobby" or gloating the fact "he goes down the pub".If politicians are to ever take seriously the efforts of the internet viewpoint then consistency & accountability to what has been written must be done with strict dilligence! Otherwise less is better,eh?

27-12-2006, 02:26 PM	#33 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Northern England Posts: 7,105 Party: Free England Party	Percentage,thanks for your posting on this,your points and remarks are noted.