Richard Suchorzewski Resigns

Richardski · 05-10-2006, 02:10 AM

Dear Colleague,

It is with great sadness and after much consideration that I have today sent by eMail and Royal Mail to The Chairman of UKIP the following letter:

5th October 2006

Dear Chairman,

Please be so good as to accept, and post on UKIP.org, this my letter of resignation from The UK Independence Party.

It was a privilege to be elected Chairman of UKIP Wales and work to represent the members in restructuring and introducing an organisational structure for growth. I would like to thank, for their invaluable assistance, John Bufton as Regional Organiser and my hard working and supportive committee and members in Wales. I am pleased to have been able to help turn UKIP Wales around and put in place foundations for growth and success in the National Assembly Elections next May.

I was honoured to be elected by the membership to represent them on the NEC, where they believed I had specialist skills and experience to best represent their interests, to the benefit of UKIP and its primary cause.

When I stood for the leadership election I did so, on a ticket of Transparency, Integrity and Equality. These standards reflect my inner beliefs, as well as the moral, ethical and Christian principles upon which I have based my whole life. I knew there were significant problems with the Party, and also believed that the moral integrity of a number of people at the top left much to be desired.

It was my belief that should I be elected leader these problems could be resolved and the Party then could move forward together, on a firmer footing in probity and strength.

Nothing however prepared me for the scurrilous behaviour, defamatory comments and downright dishonesty of some of Nigel Farage’s & David Bannerman’s staff, supporters and members of the Press Office staff, in which they clearly colluded.

I was accused of having associations with the BNP – even when these scoundrels knew that my grandfather was murdered by the Nazis in a concentration camp and my Great Grandfather was discovered hanged by them from a lamp post near his home by my 14 year old Father. Further I am angry that UKIP’s leadership were happy to collude in this base and obscene slur, particularly in the light of the fact that I have been ‘courting’ a young woman from St Lucia for the last 2 years, she herself has been victimised by racial abuse.

I was accused of being a homosexual, despite no evidence of this, and my having been happily married for 14 years, a marriage which sadly ended in an amicable divorce and now subsequently I am courting the above mentioned lady.

I was accused of having ‘run up’ a company debt of £4millions in one of my businesses when these accusers knew that I had purchased the company with secured debts, that it had already accrued, amounting to £4millions of losses. My business is in the field of mergers and acquisitions, specialising in the purchase, development and sale of problematic companies. My critics in this area are either commercial illiterates or unarguably dishonest either of which reflects ill on the competence of the new leadership.

My local newspaper was contacted by an UKIP official and advised to look into some of these accusations – in order to attempt to taint my unblemished reputation.

Even friends within my own local Conservative Party have informed me that they were asked for ‘any dirt’ they had on me including my political, personal and business affairs.

This list shamefully goes on.

Despite all of this I was willing to forgive and forget.
I called for Party unity behind the new leader Nigel Farage, regardless of how he had gained his new position. I hoped this would in some way result in a change of attitude.

Clearly it did NOT. Farage colluded with, and thus endorsed the scurrilous behaviour. He was not prepared for his staff to apologise for the BNP allegations as he felt that the issue ‘would go away’ – and he tried to justify the concern on the basis that a fellow NEC member David Abbott volunteered his support of my leadership candidacy. (David Abbott is the very man whom Farage and his secretary Douglas Denny introduced and actively supported to the NEC and only turned against when he supported my candidacy.)

Farage also claimed concern in that a Mr Andrew Edwards supported my leadership bid on an internet blog that he runs. I am to be tainted by this, even though I have never posted on his site, spoken to, nor communicated with the said person, who I am advised is NOT a member of UKIP.

Farage has also claimed that a long term associate of his, Greg Lance-Watkins is a supporter and associate of the BNP, of which I have seen no evidence – yet this seems to besmirch my reputation, as G.L-W. openly supported my candidacy, having stated, based on extensive personal dealings with Nigel Farage that “he was a good performer for UKIP but lacked either the probity or competence to lead UKIP.”

This logic that UKIP’s new leader has adopted if seriously applied, must call into question his own credentials, bearing in mind both his long term association with G.L-W. and that the BNP actually refused to stand against Farage, and supported, his candidacy at the Bromley by-election. Does this make Nigel a BNP supporter?

Rather than be magnanimous in victory and help the Party unite, Nigel and his clique overturned a perfectly legitimate democratic vote at the NEC which had elected Geoffrey Kingscott (a most honourable man) as Party Secretary, denying the Party of another person with integrity at the top, and placing his supporter the discredited Douglas Denny in the post.

A witch hunt has now commenced, seemingly with the aim to disingenuously massage MEP lists, with the disciplinary hearing of Peter Baker for daring to make public his committee’s majority voted opposition to Roger Knapman’s morally questionable exploitation and involvement in a Polish Workers import business run by his son.

Similarly Dennis Brookes a loyal and devoted supporter and Regional Organiser of UKIP would seem to have been victimised, for having the temerity not to object to his committee’s support of my candidacy, and this apparently has contributed to losing him his job. I have no doubt from Nigel’s discussion with me, subsequent to the election, that others too will suffer similar fates.

On policy issues, Nigel has made statements already, that make it clear to me, we are to become a shadow alternative Tory Party. A pressure group created to persuade the Tories to dump Cameron and change its policy on the EU. I am sorry; I did not leave the real Tory party to join a poor imitation.

I believed UKIP was sincere in its endeavour to extricate Britain from the European Union, returning sovereignty to a British Parliament and playing a full independent part in that new Parliament.

On financial and transparency issues, I believe a cloud still overhangs the Ashford call centre and various aspects of UKIP accounts. Also the financial dealings and involvement in fraud, (as exposed by the media), of Tom Wise, one of UKIP’s MEP’s, have not adequately been resolved.

Likewise there has been a lack of transparency of others. I have contended that funding mechanisms are too heavily reliant on the EU, as this makes us subservient to the very body from which we wish to disassociate and which we openly accuse of corruption particularly in the area of accounting!.

I stood for leader knowing full well that it was a challenge I was unlikely to win. Farage had control of a number of advantages that if abused would guarantee him success. Knowing this, I was more than surprised that he allowed his cronies, supporters and certain staff to openly and reprehensibly lie and rubbish a loyal UKIP member, with elected duties, who devoted the last 2 years of his life, full time, unpaid, to help UKIP progress.

Even now in ‘victory’, Farage appears determined not to change his ways, and because of this I cannot support this Party under his leadership any longer.

Reluctantly I am left with no honourable action open to me other than leave, as I am not prepared to give my good name, reputation and integrity in support of Farage and many in his clique. I therefore stand alongside other Party devotees and former NEC members, Anthony Butcher, Gill Chant and others (not to mention the many activists who have already resigned).

My heart and my grateful thanks go out to all of those who supported me and the values in which we believed, and those who have committed so much of their lives in their patriotic pursuit of regaining democracy, British Independence and Sovereignty.

It does not give me any satisfaction to realise that the old saying “Fish Rots from the Head Down” may have more than a cursory resemblance to UKIP.

Please be so good as to convey to the membership my very best wishes and thanks for allowing me to serve them! At the moment I feel honour bound to continue the struggle for liberation from the EU and better Governance outside of UKIP, but would be happy to reconsider my position should there be notable changes within UKIP in the future under very different leadership.

Yours Sincerely,

Richard Suchorzewski
UKIP Wales Chairman (resigned 5th Oct 2006)
NEC Member (resigned 5th Oct 2006).

jim h · 05-10-2006, 06:10 AM

Please reconsider . If we are to stand any chance of leaving the EU UKIP must be an effective fighting force, without you it will ossify into a clique that will wasts a way. As th saying goes all good men must come to the aid of the Party

Lewkip · 05-10-2006, 07:18 AM

I think that there is no way back for Richard after a letter like that. It is a shame that after a mere two years, he has gone from brand new member to leadership candidate and now out of the party. I still consider myself a junior member with just three years membership under my belt yet he seems to have gone through an entire political lifetime in a blink of an eye.

There is something rather fleeting about this, and when I look around at those who have made real political progress - in UKIP and other parties, both in the UK and overseas, past and present, they seem to have devoted years of grunt work to the cause, weathering the blows that inevitably arise in this game.

Was Richard really expecting changes on his terms so soon? I suggest his influence was in proportion to his contribution and that this was borne out by his numbers in the leadership vote last month.

We've all been there before: Standing in a local, assembly, parliamentary or Euro election and getting miserable returns. Was it really an electorate against UKIP or do you simply reap what you sow by how relevant (or not) you are to the constituency you stand for?

Something for us all to reflect upon...

michael mcgough · 05-10-2006, 07:37 AM

His timing matches that of his chosen deputy ;timed for maximum impact before Conference.

ArthurC · 05-10-2006, 07:52 AM

A great shame.

But has it occurred to Richard that his failure to get elected as leader by the UKIP membership itself, may have had less to do with the antics of Farage et al, and more to do with his association with GLW, a man who is despised by most sane thinking UKIPers?
He should have known that the involvement and support of GLW and his little clique of madmen would be the kiss of death to any candidate.
Its not Richards fault perhaps, that he has been USED purely as a means of undermining GLW's ex-mate Farage's candidature, but he should have disassociated himself from Watkins endorsement right from the start.
AC

cookie65 · 05-10-2006, 07:59 AM

A great shame, I supported Richard in the leadership election. When Nigel won I decided to put my full weight behind the elected leader I did not feel that there was any option. If you are in the Party you must support it fully.
I am disappointed that Richard has timed his resignation to embarrass the party conference. I thought he was bigger than that.
Could I just urge the next person to leave quietly, there is no need to slam the Door. Please consider the colleagues you leave behind. Don't make the Party any more of a laughing stock

SponPlague · 05-10-2006, 08:28 AM

Hmm. A lot hinges on who Nigel's new team are going to be, and I await the announcements at conference with interest, particulatly on web and discipline matters.

I wish Richard had stayed to find out, too, perhaps he knows something we don't? :x

Resigned Member · 05-10-2006, 08:29 AM

The Faragistas are putting the exit down to pique on Skis part. In true Farage style they fail to address the wave of misbehaviour, financial and sexual sleaze emanating from Farage.

[snip rumours need to be backed up with fact here thanks]

mkpdavies · 05-10-2006, 08:41 AM

I don't blame him.

It's hard not to be bitter when you have to put up with the slurs he had thrown at him.

Still, just as Cameron is having a clear out of anti-EU, low tax, small government types at the Tories, so Nigel is getting a clear out of his own.

He now has 100% control and will be able to deploy his plan even more to the letter, with olny Niall Warry getting in the way.

It's no real big deal though. UKIP can write it off as a bitter lemons and it comes early enough for it to be forgotten by the time the elections come around.

C_steam · 05-10-2006, 08:42 AM

Having read Richard's missive in detail, I can only say that it strikes me as 100% accurate, in line with what I know and have been told, and accurately reflects my feelings too.

Well said, Richard.

05-10-2006, 02:10 AM	#1 (permalink)
Richardski Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Wales Posts: 24	Richard Suchorzewski Resigns Dear Colleague, It is with great sadness and after much consideration that I have today sent by eMail and Royal Mail to The Chairman of UKIP the following letter: 5th October 2006 Dear Chairman, Please be so good as to accept, and post on UKIP.org, this my letter of resignation from The UK Independence Party. It was a privilege to be elected Chairman of UKIP Wales and work to represent the members in restructuring and introducing an organisational structure for growth. I would like to thank, for their invaluable assistance, John Bufton as Regional Organiser and my hard working and supportive committee and members in Wales. I am pleased to have been able to help turn UKIP Wales around and put in place foundations for growth and success in the National Assembly Elections next May. I was honoured to be elected by the membership to represent them on the NEC, where they believed I had specialist skills and experience to best represent their interests, to the benefit of UKIP and its primary cause. When I stood for the leadership election I did so, on a ticket of Transparency, Integrity and Equality. These standards reflect my inner beliefs, as well as the moral, ethical and Christian principles upon which I have based my whole life. I knew there were significant problems with the Party, and also believed that the moral integrity of a number of people at the top left much to be desired. It was my belief that should I be elected leader these problems could be resolved and the Party then could move forward together, on a firmer footing in probity and strength. Nothing however prepared me for the scurrilous behaviour, defamatory comments and downright dishonesty of some of Nigel Farage’s & David Bannerman’s staff, supporters and members of the Press Office staff, in which they clearly colluded. I was accused of having associations with the BNP – even when these scoundrels knew that my grandfather was murdered by the Nazis in a concentration camp and my Great Grandfather was discovered hanged by them from a lamp post near his home by my 14 year old Father. Further I am angry that UKIP’s leadership were happy to collude in this base and obscene slur, particularly in the light of the fact that I have been ‘courting’ a young woman from St Lucia for the last 2 years, she herself has been victimised by racial abuse. I was accused of being a homosexual, despite no evidence of this, and my having been happily married for 14 years, a marriage which sadly ended in an amicable divorce and now subsequently I am courting the above mentioned lady. I was accused of having ‘run up’ a company debt of £4millions in one of my businesses when these accusers knew that I had purchased the company with secured debts, that it had already accrued, amounting to £4millions of losses. My business is in the field of mergers and acquisitions, specialising in the purchase, development and sale of problematic companies. My critics in this area are either commercial illiterates or unarguably dishonest either of which reflects ill on the competence of the new leadership. My local newspaper was contacted by an UKIP official and advised to look into some of these accusations – in order to attempt to taint my unblemished reputation. Even friends within my own local Conservative Party have informed me that they were asked for ‘any dirt’ they had on me including my political, personal and business affairs. This list shamefully goes on. Despite all of this I was willing to forgive and forget. I called for Party unity behind the new leader Nigel Farage, regardless of how he had gained his new position. I hoped this would in some way result in a change of attitude. Clearly it did NOT. Farage colluded with, and thus endorsed the scurrilous behaviour. He was not prepared for his staff to apologise for the BNP allegations as he felt that the issue ‘would go away’ – and he tried to justify the concern on the basis that a fellow NEC member David Abbott volunteered his support of my leadership candidacy. (David Abbott is the very man whom Farage and his secretary Douglas Denny introduced and actively supported to the NEC and only turned against when he supported my candidacy.) Farage also claimed concern in that a Mr Andrew Edwards supported my leadership bid on an internet blog that he runs. I am to be tainted by this, even though I have never posted on his site, spoken to, nor communicated with the said person, who I am advised is NOT a member of UKIP. Farage has also claimed that a long term associate of his, Greg Lance-Watkins is a supporter and associate of the BNP, of which I have seen no evidence – yet this seems to besmirch my reputation, as G.L-W. openly supported my candidacy, having stated, based on extensive personal dealings with Nigel Farage that “he was a good performer for UKIP but lacked either the probity or competence to lead UKIP.” This logic that UKIP’s new leader has adopted if seriously applied, must call into question his own credentials, bearing in mind both his long term association with G.L-W. and that the BNP actually refused to stand against Farage, and supported, his candidacy at the Bromley by-election. Does this make Nigel a BNP supporter? Rather than be magnanimous in victory and help the Party unite, Nigel and his clique overturned a perfectly legitimate democratic vote at the NEC which had elected Geoffrey Kingscott (a most honourable man) as Party Secretary, denying the Party of another person with integrity at the top, and placing his supporter the discredited Douglas Denny in the post. A witch hunt has now commenced, seemingly with the aim to disingenuously massage MEP lists, with the disciplinary hearing of Peter Baker for daring to make public his committee’s majority voted opposition to Roger Knapman’s morally questionable exploitation and involvement in a Polish Workers import business run by his son. Similarly Dennis Brookes a loyal and devoted supporter and Regional Organiser of UKIP would seem to have been victimised, for having the temerity not to object to his committee’s support of my candidacy, and this apparently has contributed to losing him his job. I have no doubt from Nigel’s discussion with me, subsequent to the election, that others too will suffer similar fates. On policy issues, Nigel has made statements already, that make it clear to me, we are to become a shadow alternative Tory Party. A pressure group created to persuade the Tories to dump Cameron and change its policy on the EU. I am sorry; I did not leave the real Tory party to join a poor imitation. I believed UKIP was sincere in its endeavour to extricate Britain from the European Union, returning sovereignty to a British Parliament and playing a full independent part in that new Parliament. On financial and transparency issues, I believe a cloud still overhangs the Ashford call centre and various aspects of UKIP accounts. Also the financial dealings and involvement in fraud, (as exposed by the media), of Tom Wise, one of UKIP’s MEP’s, have not adequately been resolved. Likewise there has been a lack of transparency of others. I have contended that funding mechanisms are too heavily reliant on the EU, as this makes us subservient to the very body from which we wish to disassociate and which we openly accuse of corruption particularly in the area of accounting!. I stood for leader knowing full well that it was a challenge I was unlikely to win. Farage had control of a number of advantages that if abused would guarantee him success. Knowing this, I was more than surprised that he allowed his cronies, supporters and certain staff to openly and reprehensibly lie and rubbish a loyal UKIP member, with elected duties, who devoted the last 2 years of his life, full time, unpaid, to help UKIP progress. Even now in ‘victory’, Farage appears determined not to change his ways, and because of this I cannot support this Party under his leadership any longer. Reluctantly I am left with no honourable action open to me other than leave, as I am not prepared to give my good name, reputation and integrity in support of Farage and many in his clique. I therefore stand alongside other Party devotees and former NEC members, Anthony Butcher, Gill Chant and others (not to mention the many activists who have already resigned). My heart and my grateful thanks go out to all of those who supported me and the values in which we believed, and those who have committed so much of their lives in their patriotic pursuit of regaining democracy, British Independence and Sovereignty. It does not give me any satisfaction to realise that the old saying “Fish Rots from the Head Down” may have more than a cursory resemblance to UKIP. Please be so good as to convey to the membership my very best wishes and thanks for allowing me to serve them! At the moment I feel honour bound to continue the struggle for liberation from the EU and better Governance outside of UKIP, but would be happy to reconsider my position should there be notable changes within UKIP in the future under very different leadership. Yours Sincerely, Richard Suchorzewski UKIP Wales Chairman (resigned 5th Oct 2006) NEC Member (resigned 5th Oct 2006).

05-10-2006, 07:18 AM	#3 (permalink)
Lewkip Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Lewisham Posts: 214	No way back I think that there is no way back for Richard after a letter like that. It is a shame that after a mere two years, he has gone from brand new member to leadership candidate and now out of the party. I still consider myself a junior member with just three years membership under my belt yet he seems to have gone through an entire political lifetime in a blink of an eye. There is something rather fleeting about this, and when I look around at those who have made real political progress - in UKIP and other parties, both in the UK and overseas, past and present, they seem to have devoted years of grunt work to the cause, weathering the blows that inevitably arise in this game. Was Richard really expecting changes on his terms so soon? I suggest his influence was in proportion to his contribution and that this was borne out by his numbers in the leadership vote last month. We've all been there before: Standing in a local, assembly, parliamentary or Euro election and getting miserable returns. Was it really an electorate against UKIP or do you simply reap what you sow by how relevant (or not) you are to the constituency you stand for? Something for us all to reflect upon...

05-10-2006, 08:29 AM	#8 (permalink)
Resigned Member Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 134	Richard The Faragistas are putting the exit down to pique on Skis part. In true Farage style they fail to address the wave of misbehaviour, financial and sexual sleaze emanating from Farage. [snip rumours need to be backed up with fact here thanks]

05-10-2006, 08:41 AM	#9 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	I don't blame him. It's hard not to be bitter when you have to put up with the slurs he had thrown at him. Still, just as Cameron is having a clear out of anti-EU, low tax, small government types at the Tories, so Nigel is getting a clear out of his own. He now has 100% control and will be able to deploy his plan even more to the letter, with olny Niall Warry getting in the way. It's no real big deal though. UKIP can write it off as a bitter lemons and it comes early enough for it to be forgotten by the time the elections come around. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-10-2006, 06:10 AM	#2 (permalink)
jim h Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 361	Please reconsider . If we are to stand any chance of leaving the EU UKIP must be an effective fighting force, without you it will ossify into a clique that will wasts a way. As th saying goes all good men must come to the aid of the Party

05-10-2006, 07:37 AM	#4 (permalink)
michael mcgough Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Essex Posts: 682	His timing matches that of his chosen deputy ;timed for maximum impact before Conference.

05-10-2006, 07:52 AM	#5 (permalink)
ArthurC Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 15	A great shame. But has it occurred to Richard that his failure to get elected as leader by the UKIP membership itself, may have had less to do with the antics of Farage et al, and more to do with his association with GLW, a man who is despised by most sane thinking UKIPers? He should have known that the involvement and support of GLW and his little clique of madmen would be the kiss of death to any candidate. Its not Richards fault perhaps, that he has been USED purely as a means of undermining GLW's ex-mate Farage's candidature, but he should have disassociated himself from Watkins endorsement right from the start. AC

05-10-2006, 07:59 AM	#6 (permalink)
cookie65 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: hyde cheshire Posts: 643	A great shame, I supported Richard in the leadership election. When Nigel won I decided to put my full weight behind the elected leader I did not feel that there was any option. If you are in the Party you must support it fully. I am disappointed that Richard has timed his resignation to embarrass the party conference. I thought he was bigger than that. Could I just urge the next person to leave quietly, there is no need to slam the Door. Please consider the colleagues you leave behind. Don't make the Party any more of a laughing stock

05-10-2006, 08:28 AM	#7 (permalink)
SponPlague Uber Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Zurich Posts: 2,455	Hmm. A lot hinges on who Nigel's new team are going to be, and I await the announcements at conference with interest, particulatly on web and discipline matters. I wish Richard had stayed to find out, too, perhaps he knows something we don't? :x

05-10-2006, 08:42 AM	#10 (permalink)
C_steam Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Paddling up 5hit creek..... Posts: 7,501	Having read Richard's missive in detail, I can only say that it strikes me as 100% accurate, in line with what I know and have been told, and accurately reflects my feelings too. Well said, Richard.