Richard Suchorzewski Resigns

Niall Warry · 05-10-2006, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernow

I'm both disappointed and annoyed with Richards resignation letter being posted on this public forum. I backed him for the party leadership but now realise I backed the wrong man. I and thousands of other volunteers have worked hard for UKIP as we believe UKIP is the only true anti EU party Richard having a go at Nigel Farage on a public forum will not "hurt" Nigel but will do immense damage to UKIP, still perhaps that was the plan all along?!

Get over it and wake up and smell the coffee :wink:

Niall Warry · 05-10-2006, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

It's a shift, that's all.

You are seeing UKIP turn into a party that will do what it takes to win, rather than do what is right to win.

Maybe that's the only way it can win.

You have definately taken the Nigel pill

andypandy · 05-10-2006, 06:21 PM

It also so proves something that I wrote some time ago namely, UKIP needs to make sure that prospective leadership candidates should have several years membership behind them, and the party must know a lot more than clearly they did regarding RS. The man's brief political history should be written as an example of how NOT to behave in politics.

Niall Warry · 05-10-2006, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andypandy

It also so proves something that I wrote some time ago namely, UKIP needs to make sure that prospective leadership candidates should have several years membership behind them, and the party must know a lot more than clearly they did regarding RS. The man's brief political history should be written as an example of how NOT to behave in politics.

Pity then we elected the failed Knapman to be are last leader :wink:

SponPlague · 05-10-2006, 07:17 PM

If I were Nigel, I'd be more worried about those who work in publicity and used to work for the BBC - all those contacts... :twisted:

SponPlague · 05-10-2006, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andypandy

It also so proves something that I wrote some time ago namely, UKIP needs to make sure that prospective leadership candidates should have several years membership behind them, and the party must know a lot more than clearly they did regarding RS. The man's brief political history should be written as an example of how NOT to behave in politics.

Ahhh, so Roger shouldn't have stood for the leadership, then?

eublues · 05-10-2006, 07:36 PM

I mentioned this resignation business to my wife who is not a member and doesn't follow events in UKIP closely (e.g. about RS being accused of being a homosexual), and on that she says what is the problem with that accusation - it would do UKIP's image a lot of good.

I must say it does seem rather odd that he refers to this particular accusation as "a base and obscene slur".

He names numerous people (and their unspecified friends) seen as doing him harm by underhand methods, and lists the supposed harms done to him, but fails to specify the harm each has allegedly done, blaming all potentially for everything.

I am prepared to accept that he may have had a bit of unfair treatment, but is his letter not unfair to at least some of these people, so that there is a bit of pot and kettle in all this.

michael mcgough · 05-10-2006, 07:41 PM

By the manner and timing of their resignations may they be judged.

B.A.Ware · 05-10-2006, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael mcgough

By the manner and timing of their resignations may they be judged.

When people see wrong being done best they keep quite :roll:

C_steam · 05-10-2006, 07:58 PM

Quote:

By the manner and timing of their resignations may they be judged.

Is this your normal style of response or are you just practising to be a pompous tw@t?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-10-2006, 06:21 PM	#43 (permalink)
andypandy Senior Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 880	It also so proves something that I wrote some time ago namely, UKIP needs to make sure that prospective leadership candidates should have several years membership behind them, and the party must know a lot more than clearly they did regarding RS. The man's brief political history should be written as an example of how NOT to behave in politics.

05-10-2006, 07:17 PM	#45 (permalink)
SponPlague Uber Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Zurich Posts: 3,401	If I were Nigel, I'd be more worried about those who work in publicity and used to work for the BBC - all those contacts... :twisted:

05-10-2006, 07:36 PM	#47 (permalink)
eublues Uber Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 3,196	I mentioned this resignation business to my wife who is not a member and doesn't follow events in UKIP closely (e.g. about RS being accused of being a homosexual), and on that she says what is the problem with that accusation - it would do UKIP's image a lot of good. I must say it does seem rather odd that he refers to this particular accusation as "a base and obscene slur". He names numerous people (and their unspecified friends) seen as doing him harm by underhand methods, and lists the supposed harms done to him, but fails to specify the harm each has allegedly done, blaming all potentially for everything. I am prepared to accept that he may have had a bit of unfair treatment, but is his letter not unfair to at least some of these people, so that there is a bit of pot and kettle in all this.

05-10-2006, 07:41 PM	#48 (permalink)
michael mcgough Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Essex Posts: 1,254	By the manner and timing of their resignations may they be judged.