![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 23,176
![]() |
Quote:
Mr. Spink was the first Conservative MP to speak out in defence of UKIP when David Cameron made his foolish and misguided verbal attack on UKIP in a radio interview on 4.4.2006. Not only did Mr. Spink defend and praise UKIP (after anti-UKIP David Cameron had vilified UKIP) - but he kept on doing so .UKIP should not use its resources fighting Mr. Spink. They should channel funds and efforts elsewhere in Essex 8) . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Essex
Posts: 618
![]() |
Britannist wrote
Quote:
Please bear in mind that at the last General Election, when UKIP stood against Bob Spink, he increased his majority 8 fold from 985 to to 8201. The UKIP vote increased from 1,273 to 3,431 = approximately 7.5% of the poll. The UKIP total spend was less than £1,000. In contrast, in the recent Bromley by-election against a drop in the Tory vote of 50% from 21,412 to 11,621, Nigel Farage only managed to get 2,347 votes = 8.08% with a spend of upwards of £50,000. At the 2005 General Election the South Essex Branch did as it was told and fought seven seats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset
Posts: 363
![]() |
Independent UKIP:
Quote:
How can you support UKIP and talk such rubbish about not opposing another candidate regardless of what party they are from. Independent UKIP: Quote:
fARAGE IS NOW NOT OPPOSING TORIES? tELL ME MORE. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,492
![]() |
Quote:
On your other point regarding tories that is fair criticism as I specifically referred to the tories because that was what Basildon Boy mentioned. UKIP will now not oppose any Tory, Labour or Lib Dem candidate who has signed up to the better off out campaign. Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: N'Djamena, Chad
Posts: 2,063
![]() |
UKIP shopuld stand against BobSpink MP - are we that stupid that we have swallowed hook line and sinker the platitudes Spink throws in the direction of UKIP?
He says these things so we dont stand against him - he is still a bloody tory and deserves to have somebody stand aainst him! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,492
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bristol
Posts: 166
![]() |
Quote:
Firstly, speaking as a trades unionist, the "Freedom Association" has a nasty, far right history. A "better off out" campaign is a good thing of itself, but if it gains momentum and the press rediscover their archives, things could turn nasty for those associated with it. Secondly, those constituencies with eurosceptic MPs are often those with the strongest UKIP membership! The two things are interrelated, and not in a simplistic way either: if the area is especially eurosceptic to start with, you'd expect the Tories to reflect that in their choice of candidate/MP. Crucially too, having a credible UKIP opposition to the Tories in place has forced their hand, frequently getting more eurosceptic behaviour out of their people than would otherwise be the case. So this policy risks damaging our strongest branches, and taking the heat off the Tories, the latter being exactly what Farage's critics have been saying he intended all along. Not a good start, and this is but one statement! 'spect that's enough to firmly put me in the 'troublemaker' camp. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]