Unbiased view

leecamowol · 16-08-2006, 10:16 PM

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that I asked my fiancee (who is not interestied in politics and doesn't support a particular party, but does vote) to read the campaign leaflets for leadership. And after much consideration and reading she decided that the following order would have her potential vote:

1. Richard Suchorzewski
2. Nigel Farage
3. David Noakes
4. David Campbell Bannerman

She says Richard stood out. Nigel was okay. And the other two would not be in her consideration.

I thought this was a good exercise to see who may win over voters such as her.

mkpdavies · 16-08-2006, 10:57 PM

I'm surpised DCB did so badly, yet Farage did so well.

Any chance of an update on her reasons?

ryansoton · 17-08-2006, 10:11 AM

If I made my decision based on campaign leaflets sent out with inpendence DCB would have got my vote.
I would have ranked them as below

1 DCB
2 RS
3 NF
4 DN

I never voted DCB though!!!

mkpdavies · 17-08-2006, 10:17 AM

My little more biased view, my my honest view never-the-less is

1. Richard S
2. DCB
3. David Noakes
4. Nigel

Richards was just better set out and clearer IMHO, but I agree DCB was a close second.

Nigels was about as bad as it can get.

Biscuitman · 17-08-2006, 04:11 PM

Quote:

I asked my fiancee (who is not interested in politics)

You mean to say you are engaged to a Lib/Dem?

brave of you to admit it.

kernow · 17-08-2006, 04:22 PM

Nice one Biscuitman!

16-08-2006, 10:16 PM	#1 (permalink)
leecamowol Junior Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Lichfield Posts: 43	Unbiased view Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I asked my fiancee (who is not interestied in politics and doesn't support a particular party, but does vote) to read the campaign leaflets for leadership. And after much consideration and reading she decided that the following order would have her potential vote: 1. Richard Suchorzewski 2. Nigel Farage 3. David Noakes 4. David Campbell Bannerman She says Richard stood out. Nigel was okay. And the other two would not be in her consideration. I thought this was a good exercise to see who may win over voters such as her.

16-08-2006, 10:57 PM	#2 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,053 Party: Libertarian Party	I'm surpised DCB did so badly, yet Farage did so well. Any chance of an update on her reasons? __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

17-08-2006, 10:17 AM	#4 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 31,053 Party: Libertarian Party	My little more biased view, my my honest view never-the-less is 1. Richard S 2. DCB 3. David Noakes 4. Nigel Richards was just better set out and clearer IMHO, but I agree DCB was a close second. Nigels was about as bad as it can get. __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

17-08-2006, 10:11 AM	#3 (permalink)
ryansoton Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Southampton Posts: 781 Party: Other	If I made my decision based on campaign leaflets sent out with inpendence DCB would have got my vote. I would have ranked them as below 1 DCB 2 RS 3 NF 4 DN I never voted DCB though!!!

17-08-2006, 04:22 PM	#6 (permalink)
kernow Uber Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 5,182	Nice one Biscuitman!