Chad Noble embroiled in dirty tactics

progcon.org · 23-07-2006, 09:58 PM

Anthony, you need to change the title of this thread as it is clearly misleading as I have not committed to any candidate as yet.

The title could be interpreted as a smear on DCB when I have not yet made up my mind.

Please, in the interests of truth, change the title?

progcon.org · 23-07-2006, 10:04 PM

OK, so now you are accusingme of lying in black and white.

SO, let's have it slowly. Print a statement from my site that you can show to be a lie, not an opinion that you do not like but a lie.

Anthony Butcher · 23-07-2006, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by progcon.org

Anthony, you need to change the title of this thread as it is clearly misleading as I have not committed to any candidate as yet.

You are sporting a Nigel Farage avatar, and are listed as endorsing Nigel on his website.

progcon.org · 23-07-2006, 10:06 PM

I've already posted that there was no split avatar to show undecided. Catch up.

Now please, detail the lies, being the plural of lie, so there must be more than one, so let's have them.

You have accused me of lies, so come on, list them.

progcon.org · 23-07-2006, 10:13 PM

Aah, there we go, that wasn't hard was it?

Removed the 'dcb' first and removed the 'lies' second.

Now that looks altogether different doesn't it? Kind of makes the whole thread a bit embarrassing doesn't it?

So I only have to dig a little bit and you find yourself having to remove the accusation that spawned this whole thread.

Sheesh! Think before accusing people of lying in future Anthony.

I take it the apology email is on its way over to me as many people would have seen this thread that you have now had to backtrack on.

Anthony Butcher · 23-07-2006, 10:14 PM

My involvement
Matt's involvement
Richard's lack of action on something he knows nothing about
Reason for the name change of the forum
Claims of a 'dirty tactics' campaign.

progcon.org · 23-07-2006, 10:16 PM

Indeed, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It was not my aim, but it is your interpretation. Fine.

However, you were accusing me of lying, and you mailed Douglas Denny to that effect. Now you have backtracked, I would expect an email to correct your earlier assertions at your earliest convenience.

Anthony Butcher · 23-07-2006, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by progcon.org

Indeed, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It was not my aim, but it is your interpretation. Fine.

However, you were accusing me of lying, and you mailed Douglas Denny to that effect. Now you have backtracked, I would expect an email to correct your earlier assertions at your earliest convenience.

Now you are making it up about me backtracking as well. Unbelievable. I just listed five things above, as requested.

progcon.org · 23-07-2006, 10:22 PM

What, are you still accusing me of lying?

I consider john page creating a site using a name identical to a rival candidate's official campaign site bar the domain ending, Matt publishing the link noting that DCB's site had 'moved', and you keeping the link online, when all three of you are listed supporters of richard's campaign to be 'dirty tricks'.

Show me how that is a lie or apologise.

John Page · 23-07-2006, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

Quote:

OK, so it is so bad that anyone engaging in it should be chucked out the party... but you are going to do it in retaliation? Are you mad?

Ding ding ding, give the man a goldfish.

Spoof sites are an internet tradition, as Chad knows, bagging a few himself for the same purpose.

What a dingbat.

And it's not even a spoof - I doubt anyone would mistake it for the real thing.

All I have done is use a similar domain name which decent work by DCB's staffers would have bagged. Wouldn't a proclaimed patriot use a .uk domain anyway?

No one's going to be fooled. Someone said recently he was putting the fun back into by-elections. I'm bringing a little fun to this election, though the critique isn't exactly wild reading. I just hope the candidate I'm supporting for the leadership can better the Bromley result.

Incidentally, the vision section of DCB's site is a heavy criticism of what NF has stood for. Would he work happily under DCB after that? I doubt it.

I don't see how anyone who has actually read their sites can support both the candidates.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

23-07-2006, 09:58 PM	#31 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	Anthony, you need to change the title of this thread as it is clearly misleading as I have not committed to any candidate as yet. The title could be interpreted as a smear on DCB when I have not yet made up my mind. Please, in the interests of truth, change the title?

23-07-2006, 10:04 PM	#32 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	OK, so now you are accusingme of lying in black and white. SO, let's have it slowly. Print a statement from my site that you can show to be a lie, not an opinion that you do not like but a lie.

23-07-2006, 10:06 PM	#34 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	I've already posted that there was no split avatar to show undecided. Catch up. Now please, detail the lies, being the plural of lie, so there must be more than one, so let's have them. You have accused me of lies, so come on, list them.

23-07-2006, 10:13 PM	#35 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	Aah, there we go, that wasn't hard was it? Removed the 'dcb' first and removed the 'lies' second. Now that looks altogether different doesn't it? Kind of makes the whole thread a bit embarrassing doesn't it? So I only have to dig a little bit and you find yourself having to remove the accusation that spawned this whole thread. Sheesh! Think before accusing people of lying in future Anthony. I take it the apology email is on its way over to me as many people would have seen this thread that you have now had to backtrack on.

23-07-2006, 10:14 PM	#36 (permalink)
Anthony Butcher Administrator Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Long Ashton, Bristol Posts: 10,315 Party: None	My involvement Matt's involvement Richard's lack of action on something he knows nothing about Reason for the name change of the forum Claims of a 'dirty tactics' campaign.

23-07-2006, 10:16 PM	#37 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	Indeed, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it. It was not my aim, but it is your interpretation. Fine. However, you were accusing me of lying, and you mailed Douglas Denny to that effect. Now you have backtracked, I would expect an email to correct your earlier assertions at your earliest convenience.

23-07-2006, 10:22 PM	#39 (permalink)
progcon.org Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 934	What, are you still accusing me of lying? I consider john page creating a site using a name identical to a rival candidate's official campaign site bar the domain ending, Matt publishing the link noting that DCB's site had 'moved', and you keeping the link online, when all three of you are listed supporters of richard's campaign to be 'dirty tricks'. Show me how that is a lie or apologise.