British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2006, 12:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 56
Jerusalem is just starting out
Default Immigration and Welfare

Two hot potatoes.

In the paper today it was reported that 100,000 immigrants have gone onto welfare in the last four years. Don't we have enough, home-bred, scroungers to deal with?

UKIP policy should be that no immigrant or foreigner, whatever their circumstances, should be allowed a single benefit, including housing, for five years, when they can apply for citizenship. Everyone wishing to stay here, even asylumists, should work, and should have to get private health insurance. Is that fair? Yes. Would it be popular? Definitely.
Jerusalem is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 01-06-2006, 05:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,319
David Holland is just starting out
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerusalem
Two hot potatoes.

In the paper today it was reported that 100,000 immigrants have gone onto welfare in the last four years. Don't we have enough, home-bred, scroungers to deal with?

UKIP policy should be that no immigrant or foreigner, whatever their circumstances, should be allowed a single benefit, including housing, for five years, when they can apply for citizenship. Everyone wishing to stay here, even asylumists, should work, and should have to get private health insurance. Is that fair? Yes. Would it be popular? Definitely.
I would agree with that apart from asylum seekers because our policy is :-
"We will maintain the honourable British tradition of offering political asylum for genuine refugees. "
http://www.ukip.org/index.php?menu=f...=fivefreedoms3

We can not therefore say that if they can not get a job or a sick they should starve. Although we could (and should) say that before they get citizenship they must have paid more in taxes than they received in benefits.
__________________
More people + no new homes = housing shortage.
David Holland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 05:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
kernow has some supporters
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerusalem

UKIP policy should be that no immigrant or foreigner, whatever their circumstances, should be allowed a single benefit, including housing, for five years, when they can apply for citizenship. Everyone wishing to stay here, even asylumists, should work, and should have to get private health insurance. Is that fair? Yes. Would it be popular? Definitely.
You don't honestly think the "Lilly Lib" PC police would let that happen do you?
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 06:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare



Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerusalem
In the paper today it was reported that 100,000 immigrants have gone onto welfare in the last four years. Don't we have enough, home-bred, scroungers to deal with?
Just 'cos folks are on 'welfare' does not mean they are scroungers.
No matter who they may be.
Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 07:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
kernow has some supporters
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intbel

Just 'cos folks are on 'welfare' does not mean they are scroungers.

Home breds agreed! But illegal Immigrants on the Welfare state cannot be classed as anything else! Asylum seekers are a different class as are Legal immigrants, but illegal Immigrants cashing in on the welfare state are scroungers!
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 08:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare



Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow
Home breds agreed! But illegal Immigrants on the Welfare state cannot be classed as anything else! Asylum seekers are a different class as are Legal immigrants, but illegal Immigrants cashing in on the welfare state are scroungers!
Give 'em work permits then, perhaps, they'd not be on welfare.
__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.
Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 08:16 PM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 56
Jerusalem is just starting out
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intbel


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerusalem
In the paper today it was reported that 100,000 immigrants have gone onto welfare in the last four years. Don't we have enough, home-bred, scroungers to deal with?
Just 'cos folks are on 'welfare' does not mean they are scroungers.
No matter who they may be.
I'm not saying they are, but no country should be expected to give welfare to foreigners. It's bad for us cos we get the worst people, and it's bad for them. It breeds contempt in their minds.

As for the policy of giving sanctuary to "genuine asylum seekers", that's just parroting the orthodox, unworkable current line. The UN charter was made in a different age when refugee numbers were tiny compared to today's numbers. Millions, literally dozens of millions of Africans from places such as Darfur, Chad and Somalia are genuine refugees, but I don't want them settling in the UK.

So what's the difference between someone fleeing war and an economic migrant moving because he wants to make a buck for his family living in a shantytown? If anything I'd rather them than an asylum seeker, who often come from societies steeped in violence. Wait until riots break out between West Indian-Brits and Somalians, as they no doubt will, and we'll see what that particular civil war has done to south-east London.

And another difference between an asylum seeker and an economic migrant is the former demand benefits, and since they're not allowed to work legally, there's not much we can do.

We're priviliged to be on this life boat, but we made it, and if we take any more stragglers we're all going to drown.
Jerusalem is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 08:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
kernow has some supporters
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intbel
Give 'em work permits then, perhaps, they'd not be on welfare.
Just hope if UKIP gain power you're not put incharge of Immigration! :shock:
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 08:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Immigration and Welfare



Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow
Just hope if UKIP gain power you're not put in charge of Immigration! :shock:
I think you can be certain that hope will be fulfilled.
__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.
Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2006, 06:52 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 823
adrianwainer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Overcooked Spuds

Jerusalem wrote
Quote:
Two hot potatoes.

In the paper today it was reported that 100,000 immigrants have gone onto welfare in the last four years. Don't we have enough, home-bred, scroungers to deal with?

UKIP policy should be that no immigrant or foreigner, whatever their circumstances, should be allowed a single benefit, including housing, for five years, when they can apply for citizenship. Everyone wishing to stay here, even asylumists, should work, and should have to get private health insurance. Is that fair? Yes. Would it be popular? Definitely
No not fair.

E.G. If somebody is a decent person and they have a legitimate reason for seeking asylum in the United Kingdom and they are willing to respect UK laws and traditions and they can not work and they need state aid e.g. a Woman with a young child, they should have it.

On the other-hand there should be secure fenced guarded detention camps for people entering the United Kingdom that can not prove that they will respect UK laws and traditions and who are seeking asylum in the United Kingdom, which they can leave if they wish to return to the country they came from.

Furthermore French and Belgian passport holders seeking to enter the United Kingdom should be required to obtain a Visa before doing so.

As for scroungers, you would be better off starting with John Prescott, Ruth Kelly and Peter Hain.

Best and Warm Regards
Adrian Wainer
adrianwainer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0