![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,319
![]() |
If you were a member of another party what would you want UKIP to not do ?
Here is the beginning of a list :- 1) Talk about proper punishment of crime 2) Talk about over crowding rather than immigration per se (which can be written off a racist, however very few people think 10% more people travelling in London in the rush hour is possible let alone desirable). 3) Stop being a one issue party. 4) Present a normal image 5) Target our efforts on winnable seats.
__________________
More people + no new homes = housing shortage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,319
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
More people + no new homes = housing shortage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 934
![]() |
The other parties dont want UKIP to point out that the public is short changed of various services,from the NHS,Police Defence to propping up a sea wall in Felixstowe because money is sent to the EU,to be spent in other countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,978
Party: English Democrats
![]() |
Stand in Elections
UKIP standing definately effects our vote
__________________
English Democrats SAY NO To European Union English not British not European - It's time to decide at the 2009 European Elections |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Maidenhead
Posts: 296
![]() |
What they don't want us to do (all the usual stuff):
* Stop arguing among ourselves * Take every opportunity to promote the UKIP brand, so that the public are continually reminded of the party's existance. * Sort out the website * Have a leader with public recognition. * Push the UKIP 'direct democracy' message. So even if the voter doesn't agree with UKIP, they should vote for them anyway, because it will empower them through direct democracy. * Confound the negative image that they have attempted to pin on UKIP (eg 'single issue'). * Come up with some core values and get them publicised. * Bang on about those areas where the established parties have failed (OK, so that's all areas), and put forward the UKIP alternative. (This requires 2 things: a detailed version that journalists are unable to pick holes in, and a 'soundbite' easy to remember version for presenting to the public - eg 'honest sentencing', 'power to the people' etc). * Be able to explain precisely why UKIP can deliver where the established parties have failed. * Point out that the waste of thousands of lives in the NHS is completely unnecessary * Point out that the UK is sliding down the international competitiveness league. * Promote UKIP's solution to the 'West Lothian Question' * Point out that the tax and benefit systems are overcomplicated and that UKIP would reform them. * Point out that about a quarter of government expenditure is waste. By that I mean expenditure that delivers no benefit to the taxpayer (but it may deliver very good benefits to those doing the spending ie all those in the bureaucracies, the extra assemblies, the quangos. (For some reason John Prescott comes to mind)). So paying for UKIP's program would be easy, and there would still be scope for tax cuts. * In some of the areas where the established parties have failed (eg crime), they do at least talk about it (usually in response to media pressure), but there are some areas where they don't even do that. For example they don't even mention the dependency culture. I think that we all know of people who are playing the system, and the public are fed up with paying for it. But they have nowhere to turn. I think this could be an open goal for UKIP. Talk about what the established parties won't. * Mention the 'independence dividend' * Stress the point that the Conservatives and New Labour are increasingly difficult to tell apart, and if the electorate insist on voting for the discredited duopoly, they will end up with more of the same. It is voting for the established parties that is the 'wasted vote'. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]