British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2006, 05:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 31,183
Party: Libertarian Party
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default Woking

http://www.woking.co.uk/news/article..._id=16341.html

Quote:
Even the Conservatives’ poor showing in Woking — at odds with their winning ways across the rest of Surrey, the south east and London — could not match Labour’s disastrous evening.
Only in Maybury and Sheerwater, where the party came second, did it poll more than 200 votes in any ward and seven Labour candidates polled fewer than 100 votes. The 896 votes the party recorded in Maybury and Sheerwater compares with 1,167 votes achieved in the rest of the borough put together.
No mention of UKIP or the fact we whupped Labour in most of the seats we fought. No bias here, honest.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 11-05-2006, 06:24 AM   #2 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Britannist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
Britannist has some supporters
Default Press bias against UKIP and other sovereigntists

I wonder who owns the Woking News and Mail. Some of these 'papers are owned by one or two newspaper groups loyal to Labour. They might not admit it openly - but such groups may have a policy of portraying UKIP and or other anti-EU people in a negative 'light'. Or of ignoring them altogether - except at election time when they've got to mention the name of the UKIP candidate in accordance with electoral law.

I reckon some of these newspapers are being 'got at' by europhiles. The EU Commission has people in its London office working on relations with the press. Maybe a few nice lunches courtesy of EU officials (paid for by us via taxes to the EU) for certain local and 'regional' newspaper editors ands who knows - perhaps the editors' euroscepticism might then gently fade away :evil: .
Britannist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 31,183
Party: Libertarian Party
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

The Guardian group owns a lot of the local papers.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 106
under my rock is just starting out
Default Re: Press bias against UKIP and other sovereigntists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Britannist
except at election time when they've got to mention the name of the UKIP candidate in accordance with electoral law.
I think you'l find the law you refer to only applies to publicly funded broadcasters. Newspapers have no requirement to be fair or impartial provided they remain within the laws of libel. A Newspaper Editor will always follow the newspaper owner's editorial policy of they don't stay editor for long....lol......Independent TV News is likewise not required to be fair or balanced.

The ONLY TV Network required to be fair and balanced is the BBC and their coverage is calculated to the second using precise formulae. This is why UKIP gets so little coverage because Westminster matters include the number of MP's in the formulae, hence any calculation with zero as one of the terms will akways result in zero aas the answer.

This is why it is vital to get enough candidates standing in 2007 to reach the trigger point for a Party Election Braodcast. Once the minimum nuber is reached it becomes our RIGHT to have one.

but no newspaper will never support UKIP until the newspaper owner instructs the Editor to do so......
under my rock is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0