British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-04-2006, 05:08 PM   #11 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
FullHouse is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intbel

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow
My In laws who are not even members, only signed a street petition and afterwards were phoned up and asked for money 3 times in less than 3 weeks, I then rang the office to tell them to call off their hounds and the chap on the other end of the telephones attitude could only be described as rude! So I wondered how many other would be members got put off by that offices attitude to money!
It is unlikely to happen again now everyone has been sacked.

Actually the database used at the Ashford Call Centre records who called who and when so the same person wouldn't be called more then once from the same petition.

Also if you are in the south west, kernow, then you would have got through to the south west call centre so you should probably bring this complaint to the attention of DCB or whoever is incharge of the operation.
FullHouse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 30-04-2006, 05:48 PM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,827
kernow has some supporters
Default

[quote="FullHouse"][quote="Intbel"]



Actually the database used at the Ashford Call Centre records who called who and when so the same person wouldn't be called more then once from the same petition.

quote] You've either been given the wrong information, or you're calling my In-laws Liars!?
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2006, 05:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is just starting out
Default



Quote:
Originally Posted by FullHouse
Actually the database used at the Ashford Call Centre records who called who and when so the same person wouldn't be called more then once from the same petition.
Not exactly.
If a person is not already on the database their name is (was) not entered onto it unless a result is obtained as a result of the call. Thus a person may be called several times without any record of calls having been made to them. Depends, to a certain extent upon the operator.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FullHouse
Also if you are in the south west then you would have got through to the south west call centre so you should probably bring this complaint to the attention of DCB or whoever is incharge of the operation.
That depends upon two things - which number was called and whether anyone was available to take the call in the S.W.

The national number takes (took?) you to the nearest operational centre - so frequently folks would get through to Ashford no matter where they
live.

Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 02:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4
Katie W is just starting out
Default

Personally I dealt with Ashford Call Centre many times and I am very sad about its closure I am also very upset about what I have been reading on this forum, I never post on these forums but I have to have my say on this matter as I think Geoffery Kingscott has treaten the staff at Ashford so very very badly. Doesn't ukip believe in rights of the individual and human rights, I just can't believe no one has cared about the staff and their lively hoods. This is the fall of UKIP how on earth can it be moved to a village in Devon who's crazy idea is that and to be run by volunters, is UKIP so rich it no longer needs to make money? And to only be only til 5pm I ask you how on earth does the majority of the population who work get in touch with the party.

It is absoulety crazy, and I certainly won't be renewing my membership, as the party has noone in control and has no idea what its doing anymore, it has got very nasty and I don't want any part of it.
Katie W is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 03:07 PM   #15 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 9,684
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie W
I never post on these forums but I have to have my say on this matter as I think Geoffery Kingscott has treaten the staff at Ashford so very very badly. Doesn't ukip believe in rights of the individual and human rights, I just can't believe no one has cared about the staff and their lively hoods.
The decision was taken by the NEC, not Geoffrey Kingscott, based on advice given by the Chairman's Committee.

Geoffrey just had the unfortunate job of implementing that decision.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 03:18 PM   #16 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4
Katie W is just starting out
Default

Firstly quick to defend Geoffery Kingscott, pitty you weren't so quick to defend offer people who have been bad mouthed on this forum.

Secondly OK I think the NEC have made a very big mistake.

Who is going to make the money for the campigns, etc? Every political party has to make money and no telesales is nice but its necessary and all my dealings with Ashford have been wonderful I could never fault them.
Katie W is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 03:53 PM   #17 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 9,684
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie W
Firstly quick to defend Geoffery Kingscott, pitty you weren't so quick to defend offer people who have been bad mouthed on this forum.
I was merely correcting a factual mistake.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie W
Secondly OK I think the NEC have made a very big mistake.

Who is going to make the money for the campigns, etc? Every political party has to make money and no telesales is nice but its necessary and all my dealings with Ashford have been wonderful I could never fault them.
As I understand it (I wasn't present), Ashford was closed because it wasn't financially viable and was effectively using up a huge proportion of the party funds to keep open.

Obviously we will need a telesales operation for the big election periods, which is when Ashford was a big success.

In the mean time, we can dramatically cut down on the telephone communciation required by automating processes, switching to standing orders/direct debits for subscriptions and placing more information in the website, email and Independence.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 04:56 PM   #18 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anwhere far away from the cabalistas
Posts: 7,431
C_steam is just starting out
Default

Presuming that Katie etc are employees and,like Intbel, worked at the Ashford call centre I'd like to know on what issues GK caused so much apparent grief.

After all, he works for and is employed by UKIP - unlike the staff at the call centre. The responsible person for your employment - or otherwise - is ALWAYS the employer and whoever the employer put in charge to run the place is responsible for your day to day management. Which certainly isn't Geoff.

Now, if I'm wrong, please tell me why, and include details of who YOU think employed you in that response. If you are unsure of who employed you (and you may well be), ask me nicely and I may give you a clue......
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 06:43 PM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is just starting out
Default



Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie W
It is absoulety crazy, and I certainly won't be renewing my membership, as the party has no-one in control and has no idea what its doing anymore, it has got very nasty and I don't want any part of it.
Don't be too hasty - who knows what may happen tomorrow?

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_steam
Presuming that Katie etc are employees and, like Intbel, worked at the Ashford call centre I'd like to know on what issues GK caused so much apparent grief.

After all, he works for and is employed by UKIP - unlike the staff at the call centre....
As it happens the staff at the Ashford Call Centre were employed by UKIP.

I think UKIP has shot itself in the foot with this one and taken off its boots to do it.

Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 07:01 PM   #20 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is just starting out
Default



Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher
As I understand it (I wasn't present), Ashford was closed because it wasn't financially viable and was effectively using up a huge proportion of the party funds to keep open.
Ashford Call Centre was very viable - until it was told not to call members.
Then it was denied updated mem'ship data which was stupid because how could folks not call members unless they had an up-to-date list of members so they could know who they are so as not to call them?

The Centre was deliberately made unviable within a few short months - so please do not use 'unviability' as a reason for its closure.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher
Obviously we will need a telesales operation for the big election periods, which is when Ashford was a big success.
Such as now? We are in an election period now I believe ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher
In the mean time, we can dramatically cut down on the telephone communciation required by automating processes, switching to standing orders/direct debits for subscriptions and placing more information in the website, email and Independence.
Well, yes, closing a call centre is likely to cut down on telecoms .. you are rather stating the obvious.

As to the rest ... when will all this happen?

I rather get the feeling, Anthony, that you can find no justification for the closure if the Ashford Call Centre and are just being a mouthpiece for those who engineered its closure.

The real reasons for its closure have nothing at all to do with financial viability.

Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0