![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Logo do you like | |||
| The new one |
|
18 | 52.94% |
| The old one |
|
8 | 23.53% |
| Not bothered |
|
0 | 0% |
| Neither |
|
6 | 17.65% |
| Don't care |
|
2 | 5.88% |
| Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Without wishing to generate stupid remarks such as "And what are you, some kind of psychologist?" (I am not) I do have a basic, gut understanding of how folks' minds work.
__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cardiff. S.Wales
Posts: 611
![]() |
I do think it is a far more modern, racier logo than our old one, but that doesn't mean the hierachy think the same!
I don't believe it would cost a lot at Branch Level to change as we in Cardiff do not have hundreds of letterheads already printed to go out. We tend to print as required so that would be no problem. However HO might be different, although it could possibly slowly change the logo over a period of possibly twelve months as the old leaflets etc get used. Something nobody has mentioned is the cost of UKIP changing it's logo with the Electoral Commission, though I myself, have no idea how much this would cost. Unfortunately, as with everything about UKiP, it is all about MONEY, or rather, the lack of it. Could the cost be put to better use somewhere else? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,640
Party: UKIP
![]() |
Quote:
I think the Logo could be phased in at very little if any cost, I wouldn’t recommend scrapping any material that has been printed just recommend that from a certain date any new material printed should carry the new logo. I think the benefits will be in the marketing of Ukip, most companies now days pay a lot of attention to aesthetics and spend thousands on making products more appealing to the eye. No one is saying people would vote Ukip because of the logo but if something is more eye catching or portrays a modern image people are more likely to read it. If that isn’t the case why don’t we just print all of our materials in black and white? And why does my wife change the colour scheme in our house every few years :shock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
I agree with that. The initials UKIP mean nothing to the broad mass of millions of voters and 'floating' voters.
As for the logo, the the modern one designed so well by Intbel looks much better. However, those that want the Pound symbol dropped as the UKIP party logo altogether should remember that another anti-EU party might try and use it instead. The Popular Alliance political party (which will be eurosceptic in policy formation) has just been formed and will probably be looking for a new logo right now. I don't think much of the logos of most of the other parties. Most of their logos are forgettable . |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
![]() |
[quote="Britannist"]
However, those that want the Pound symbol dropped as the UKIP party logo altogether should remember that another anti-EU party might try and use it instead. [/quote Another good reason for not dropping the old logo! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
![]() |
[quote="B.A.Ware"]
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]