British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-03-2006, 12:03 AM   #31 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 146
UkipScot is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intbel
The guideline is simple - whatever consenting adults do in private, if it harms none other, is no person's business but their own. Prostitution falls INTO phpbb_that category.
Wrong.
It is necessary to restrain the individual, as the right of an individual, in any community, to do what he pleases, is incompatible with the interests of the whole. Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty. Experience has shown the importance of definiteness in the law.
UkipScot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 13-03-2006, 12:23 AM   #32 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Tom Wilde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London.
Posts: 2,774
Tom Wilde is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UkipScot
It is necessary to restrain the individual, as the right of an individual, in any community, to do what he pleases, is incompatible with the interests of the whole.
But if what I do doesn't affect anyone else at all, then surely it can't be "incompatible with the interests of the whole", however you interpret those? In such a case, on what grounds would you justify restraining the individual?

Similarly, if whatever a youthful G. Bloom and a prostitute freely agreed to jointly do didn't affect anybody else, then surely that too would have no impact on "the interests of the whole"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by UkipScot
Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty.
True, entirely. The purpose of the law is to stop every man from doing what might be "incompatible with the interests of the whole". But once the law has secured that, why should the law interfere any further in our choices?
Tom Wilde is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2006, 01:35 AM   #33 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Wilde
But once the law has secured that, why should the law interfere any further in our choices?
No reason .. . except for the lawmakers own desire for even more control and of course, there are always these
Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2006, 07:12 PM   #34 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,650
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Of course the 'Sex Trade' harms people other than the participants. If your street was full of used condoms, syringes etc you would know all about it.

However you are never going to put a stop to The Oldest Profession so pious platitudes are a total waste of time. We need to study the ways in which other countries like Germany seem to have effectively corralled this nuisance and allowed people to get on with whatever they want to do with a minimum of disruption to others.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2006, 07:16 PM   #35 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk
If your street was full of used condoms, syringes etc you would know all about it.
Sex trade, conducted indoors in privacy, does not result in these things.
Methinks you exaggerate slightly?
__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.
Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2006, 07:23 PM   #36 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Indeed, it is a good reason for legalising it! When legalised, it can therefore be better regulated and things like that discouraged!

Not sure you can ever fully regulate that industry though!
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2006, 08:12 PM   #37 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,650
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intbel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk
If your street was full of used condoms, syringes etc you would know all about it.
Sex trade, conducted indoors in privacy, does not result in these things.
Probably not, but it can still be very disruptive.

About 25 years ago the tarts in Southampton started to appear in the windows of houses in a couple of streets, Amsterdam style. One night my then girlfriend said she'd like to take a look at it so I said OK.

To my horror I found we had joined a slow-moving motorcade crawling down Derby Road. My little MGB looked out of place amid all the Rover 3 litres and other 'old men's cars' with elderly guys desperately eyeing up the talent while trying to drive at the same time.

There were still families living in this ghastly street. Imagine the disruption. A few months later the police put the mockers on the whole thing.

You need to create some kind of quarantined precinct for these activities.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2006, 08:17 PM   #38 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a field near you - look for the yellow and purple tent ...
Posts: 4,665
Intbel is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk
About 25 years ago the tarts in Southampton started to appear in the windows of houses in a couple of streets, Amsterdam style. One night my then girlfriend said she'd like to take a look at it so I said OK.

To my horror I found we had joined a slow-moving motorcade crawling down Derby Road. My little MGB looked out of place amid all the Rover 3 litres and other 'old men's cars' with elderly guys desperately eyeing up the talent while trying to drive at the same time.

There were still families living in this ghastly street. Imagine the disruption. A few months later the police put the mockers on the whole thing.

You need to create some kind of quarantined precinct for these activities.
See? The law can successfully intervene when necessary.
My bro' used to live in Derby Road so I know of its reputation.
Quarrantined precincts sound fine, I'd support those.
__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.
Intbel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 14-03-2006, 10:14 AM   #39 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Reading
Posts: 3,486
Biscuitman is just starting out
Default

http://euobserver.com/?aid=21120&rk=1

Commission scraps World Cup anti-prostitution plan

14.03.2006 - 09:48 CET | By Helena Spongenberg

The European Commission has scrapped a visa-toughening plan aimed at preventing forced prostitution during the World Cup in Germany later this year.

Justice commissioner Franco Frattini on Monday (13 March) said he would not propose visa reintroduction for any country and said he apologised if his views had been "misunderstood," reports Reuters news agency.

Female members of the European Parliament had criticised the plan for only being directed towards women and not towards the men buying sex, according to Danish DR online news.

Last week Mr Frattini suggested that visa requirements should be re-introduced for all non-EU citizens travelling to Germany for this summer's football world cup, especially from Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America.

The move came as a response to outcries from NGOs and politicians about an expected boom of forced prostitution during the sports event.

Estimations of the total number of women and girls that may be brought to Germany for sexual purposes vary from 40,000 to 100,000.

Mr Frattini will now suggest special hotlines in many languages for women forced INTO phpbb_prostitution.

Prostitution is legal in Germany in certain city zones, but with thousands of football fans attending the world cup, German cities face up to a 30 percent increase in the sex trade during the event, NGOs have reported.

In Berlin, within walking distance from the main football arena, a "super brothel" with 70 rooms for 600 daily customers has been built, and in Dortmund and Cologne so-called "performance boxes" - mobile units equipped with snacks and condom vending machines, toilets, alarms and emergency exits - have been installed.

More than 20 campaigns will be launched this year across Germany to boost awareness of forced prostitution.
__________________
IF THE EU WAS THE ANSWER, IT MUST HAVE BEEN A STUPID QUESTION!
Biscuitman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2006, 11:08 AM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,319
David Holland is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BASILDON BOY
Wow - so good ole foot-in-mouth-Godfrey is actually doing us all a favour by opening up a debate on the pros and cons of prostitution!

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE - can we have normal people on the next selection list for MEP candidates!
Seconded - let the other parties have the wierdos. (Mark Oaten etc)
__________________
More people + no new homes = housing shortage.
David Holland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0