Christina

No, the Void is to be avoided!

jim h

Lets just clarify matters.
On street prostitution is highly dangerous for both the prostitute and the user and the police rightly target it
Massage parlours(brothels) are much safer for both the prostitutes and the users.In London many of the women are from East Europe , not so common in the rest of the country . The idea that the majority of these women are sex slaves is wrong, most see it as an excellent opportunity to earn considerable sums of money far more than they would get in their own countries. After 2-3 years work they return home with a considerable sum saved. One problem is that they are undercutting the fees of british workers, prices have not risen for 5 or 6 years.
Escorts/callgirls are the top end of the market and all those I have met chose the profession as it is a very good earner,in London £200 per hour ,outside £120 -£150 per hour. 3 clients a day 6 days a week, 40 weeks a year nearly £150000 a year. One girl I know in Manchester has been working for 10 years and as a hard worker she gets betwen £200000 and £250000 a year she has minimal outgoings but she pays taxes through her model agency. She drives a top of the range sports car and has 2 very nice houses as well as her working apartment and she has considerable investments. Likewise ladies I know in Birmingham , Nottingham and Preston. They all when they were in teens/twenties enjoyed sex and decided they might as well make men like me pay them for the privilege. Without exception they are intelligent company (one in Birmingham has a PHD) and nice people with whom I am now friends as well as being a customer.
Politicians like to get on their soapboxes and spout a lot of rubbish about the sex trade but if it was such a prevalent evil trade why do we not hear about it more, the police have considerable powers.. The only example I am aware of recently was a raid on a massage parlour in Birmingham, end result some 20 girls were taken away, 5-6 were in fact illegal immigrants from parts of east Europe not in the EU and were deported the rest were either British or here legally. The owners were charged with living on immoral earnings ,no mention of sex trade.
Most escorts are shining examples of ambitious successful women

Edward Longshanks

I couldn't possible comment!

Did the ladies of the night get castigated for not cleaning behind the fridge though!

Intbel

__________________
We are all free to choose - every step of the way - no exceptions.

Tillycat

Farcical comic MEP said "visits were never consummated"

Flacid Bloom fails to score in Brothel.

Mikeuk

Not through want of trying I imagine.

The analogy with visiting a curry house after a binge is a good one. Efforts to comsume (as opposed to consummate) the food usually end with half of it splattered over the floor and the other half over the waiters.

BASILDON BOY

So what did Bloom splatter all over floor and the prostitutes in the Brothel then if your trying to make comparrisons?????

Mikeuk

I must say I hadn't envisaged anything quite so graphic.

Seems Mr Bloom denies he splattered anything anywhere...

...except his brains. :twisted: :twisted:

UkipScot

True. Which why the right course of action is to tackle the demand not the supply.

No. If you want that, then go join the LibDums.

The best people to help Working Girls come off the streets are those women who have done it themselves. Talk to them and they will tell you that in most instances WGs are either feeding a drug habit or trying to fund life as a single parent. Yes, there will always be a percentage for whom nymphomania or sheer avarice is their motivation but in most cases it does not seem to be. The real issue & the real debate is not what they do but why they do it - without resorting to the PC "victim" mentality.

There are those who freely choose to, those who feel compelled to and those who are forced to. We need to distinguish between them in this debate.

No-one should be in any doubt that this country is not serious about tackling the problem. You can see the evidence of our tolerance of it everywhere from pornography to london telephone kiosks to the fact that something like "The Daily Sport" even exists. The Councils turn a blind eye to brothels, even though they and the police know where they all are.
It doesn`t mean The End Of Civilisation As We Know It, but do we really want a country where we have a McWhorehouse on every High Street, with an Anne Summers and a Spliff-U-Like on either side?

Here in Scotland there was a proposal for Prostitution Tolerance Zones which thankfully was dropped. The attempt now is to tackle the punter.
If a punter knows that it`s him and not the girl who`ll get done that should dry up the demand, a more effective solution.

The PC brigade thrive on this moronic consensus to legalise everything we lack the guts to tackle. No doubt there will soon be a test case where someone will demand the Human Right to buy a shag and have a joint without fear of prosecution if they want to. Then the Brussels bonkmeisters will issue a Dogging Directive and a Rogering Regulation. These will call for the setting up of Paedophile Support Units which EuroLabour will try and pass off as their own bright idea, just like the regional assemblies. Then they will appoint Gary Glitter,Jonathan King & Pete Townsend to sit on it`s latest quango, The Sexual Equality Commission.

Legalisation of Prostitution and Drug Taking (for example) will perpetuate the problem.not solve it. I cannot and never will support such a proposal as Party Policy. If it were ever to be so, I would disassociate myself from it entirely, NEC or no.

Tom Wilde

Don't beat about the bush - are you for it or against it?