British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-11-2005, 06:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 31,182
Party: Libertarian Party
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default The EU’s Accounts: ‘A Fairytale’

http://www.ukip.org/abc_news/gen12.php?t=1&id=1687

Quote:
The European Court of Auditors’ refusal to sign off the EU’s accounts for the eleventh year in succession has brought a swift response from Jeffrey Titford MEP, Chairman of the UK Independence Party. Mr Titford said: “If the European Commissioners were Directors of a company they would face a term of imprisonment for presenting accounts which are nothing more than a fairy story."

Mr Titford continued: "The repeated failure of the Commission to have its accounts successfully audited amply demonstrates the scope for fraud within the Commission. It is an endemic problem for which no one at the Commission is willing to take responsibility. Despite repeated promises of improvement, the accounting system remains as watertight as a colander, with the Court of Auditors suggesting that 90 per cent of the £68 billion EU budget is open to fraud. The Commission and Members of the European Parliament should feel a much stronger obligation to taxpayers in the EU member states, because it is they who are footing the bill for this catalogue of skulduggery".

The European Court of Auditors issued its Annual Financial Report on the European Union’s 2004 accounts on 14th November, and was highly critical. The Court reported "structural weaknesses" in accounting procedures and said that internal policies "do not provide sufficient assurance as regards the legality and regularity of payments."

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) came in for particular criticism; the Court found that it was "still materially affected by errors", despite the fact that the CAP does not need to comply with IACS (the internal accounting system).
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0