![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,208
Party: None
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
![]() |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
Very poor.
An MEP that now has to be sacked.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,817
Party: Popular Democrats
![]() |
He should have been sacked immediately upon the offence being discovered. Yes,we know it has to go thru this and that ,the point is he should have initially been suspended and a statement then made by the UKIP Leadership,NEC or whoever does these things for UKIP.
ops: |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,178
![]() |
:!: :idea: :!: I have had a long chat with Doug Denny. There has been suggestion on this list, and elsewhere, that the discipline committee should get involved. Not yet. Those in the party who feel that Tom Wise should be treated no differently from Ashley Mote, i.e. should have his whip withdrawn as a precaution, should be escalating this through the correct channel, which is their branch chairman, or where there is no branch the regional organiser. They can then pass these thoughts upward. :!: :idea: :!:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
Why are you saying our leadership are incapable of initiating this procedure.
They should realise the damage this is doing and act.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Welwyn Hatfield (Herts.)
Posts: 1,878
![]() |
Drip drip drip is bad bad bad. In his short quote (doubtless wrenched from a context), Nigel seems to be saying that either the party was misled or it misunderstood. I'm unclear which.
The source for the report seems to be in (or very close to) the Payments Office. I wonder who / why? Shouldn't this be a relatively simple matter to bottom? (Tom said at the Eastern Counties meeting that a complaint had been made to the Disciplinary Committee.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,803
![]() |
Hi John, nice to meet you yesterday, are you going to post an intro on the 'welcome' section?
C_steam* (scribe of Lechlade 4!) *About to look pretty stupid if it's a different John Page.......... ops: |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,178
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]