British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13-11-2005, 03:08 PM   #91 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,803
C_steam is just starting out
Default

Quote:
There has been suggestion on this list, and elsewhere, that the discipline committe should get involved. Not yet
When, hypothetically, is the right point then? Or, to put it another way, what is the remit of the panel - is it to investigate and sanction ACTUAL wrongdoing after the event or to investigate POTENTIAL wrongdoing and make appropriate countermeasures?

Personally, I think that anything that brings the party INTO phpbb_disrepute needs an investigation, and that the person, if innocent, should be advised on how the matter should have been handled and on the steps needed to 'close it down' to prevent further damage.
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 13-11-2005, 03:54 PM   #92 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cowes
Posts: 1,272
Paul Birch is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_steam
Quote:
There has been suggestion on this list, and elsewhere, that the discipline committe should get involved. Not yet
When, hypothetically, is the right point then? Or, to put it another way, what is the remit of the panel - is it to investigate and sanction ACTUAL wrongdoing after the event or to investigate POTENTIAL wrongdoing and make appropriate countermeasures?
Neither. Its constitutional remit is to deal with internal disciplinary complaints brought before it by one party member against another. It cannot act without a complaint.
Paul Birch is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 13-11-2005, 04:06 PM   #93 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tees Valley Sub-Region
Posts: 331
Swivel Eyed Fanatic is just starting out
Default

The thing i find really intersting is that Wise had this amount of money unclaimed........I have never yet been to a UKIP Meeting where I wasn't asked to put my hand in my pocket to contribute towards the costs of runing UKIP.

£36,000 is probably more than we are paying the new General Secretary.....lol.....

It seems to me there are two groups in UKIP, those on the Gravy Train and those stood on the platform watching it chugg past. If UKIP MEP's are employing these people then lets have a list of who employs who and how much they pay them....and how much expenses they claim? Surely this should be public knowledge....? If this was all in the open then there woulc be nothing left to hide.....
Swivel Eyed Fanatic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 13-11-2005, 06:30 PM   #94 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
SponPlague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3,176
SponPlague is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swivel Eyed Fanatic
It seems to me there are two groups in UKIP, those on the Gravy Train and those stood on the platform watching it chugg past. If UKIP MEP's are employing these people then lets have a list of who employs who and how much they pay them....and how much expenses they claim? Surely this should be public knowledge....? If this was all in the open then there woulc be nothing left to hide.....
Apparently nine of our ten MEPs have employed an accountant to make sure all is above board.

Guess who didn't buy INTO phpbb_the package? :evil: :?: :evil:
SponPlague is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 13-11-2005, 07:49 PM   #95 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,803
C_steam is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Neither. Its constitutional remit is to deal with internal disciplinary complaints brought before it by one party member against another. It cannot act without a complaint.
I don't doubt the accuracy of the above, however it raises two points:-

1. Party Leader and all of the NEC are UKIP members, therefore could have brought the issue up, I would have thought?

2. If not, then what tool does the NEC/Leadership have if a member is suspected of bringing the party INTO phpbb_disrepute but NO MEMBER has made a complaint?
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Old 13-11-2005, 08:03 PM   #96 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
C_steam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Paddling up 5hit creek.....
Posts: 7,803
C_steam is just starting out
Default

I think locking this thread is best - there is now too much repetition with the other thread on the subject (see http://www.ukipforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=7113)
C_steam is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0