Another disasterous result

WindupMerchant · 01-08-2005, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

I am so jealous, I wish I had the ability to add graphics :cry:

Alex McKee · 01-08-2005, 06:35 PM

You do! It's the img tag, in the post reply dialogue.

WindupMerchant · 01-08-2005, 07:09 PM

What do you do? Step by step please

ops:

Alex McKee · 01-08-2005, 07:42 PM

Code:

[img]http://yoursite.com/whereyourimageis.gif[/img]

WindupMerchant · 01-08-2005, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

Code:

[img]http://yoursite.com/whereyourimageis.gif[/img]

:shock: :?

:!:

Sorry mate, STOP, I haven't got a clue what that is, and please don't go any further explaining. I have to ask my wife to refill the ink on the printer

ops:

Alex McKee · 01-08-2005, 07:57 PM

Images you want to put on the web need to be on the web already.

In the post reply dialogue there is a line of buttons at the top, with B i u etc

This is the tool bar and you can use the one called "img" to tell the software you are putting an image on. Then inside the "img" tags ([img]) you write a link to the image you want displayed.

For example:

No longer needed, demonstration successfull!

is shown by the following code

Code:

[img]http://www.ukipgloucestershire.org.uk/img/avatar.gif[/img]

Which tells the software where to find the image.

WindupMerchant · 01-08-2005, 08:01 PM

Thanks, I understood that I think. I'll try that some day

Alex McKee · 01-08-2005, 08:03 PM

You're welcome. If you only want to show the image for a day or two I will gladly put it online for you, but after a few weeks of it being on a forum it starts to take a lot of bandwidth up from my server.

I'll take down the example now probably.

WindupMerchant · 01-08-2005, 08:05 PM

I'll remember the process :wink:

Matty84 · 12-08-2005, 08:45 PM

I wouldnt get too disheartened by that result. I live close to Cambridge, albeit in one of the uber conservative rural areas just outside. But knowing cambridge, or more specifically the Coleridge ward, many of the locals are either lecturers, many of whom most likely have strong connections to european academic establishments, or typical urban 'rip borders down' liberals who would sooner see us lose our sovreignty than govern our own affairs. Anyways, while im not saying the GE result, or this local one was a great positive indictment of UKIP, this area is not demographically representative, and UKIP shouldnt change to suit it. We cant beat labour at their own game, the tories have tried that for the past 8 years and failed. Miserably. That being said, i agree that UKIP could do with an overhaul, specifically in image and presentation. Most notably, we have a vision, a positive one, of self governance and determination. The task i guess, is communicating that across to the public. I guess UKIP is in a make or break position right now in securing the funding to make this possible, which will always be hard in that donors will want results, and we cant get results without funding. To state the obvious.

is 30.42% regarded as good turnout?

01-08-2005, 07:42 PM	#14 (permalink)
Alex McKee Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gloucester Posts: 6,661	Code: [img]http://yoursite.com/whereyourimageis.gif[/img]

01-08-2005, 07:57 PM	#16 (permalink)
Alex McKee Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gloucester Posts: 6,661	Images you want to put on the web need to be on the web already. In the post reply dialogue there is a line of buttons at the top, with B i u etc This is the tool bar and you can use the one called "img" to tell the software you are putting an image on. Then inside the "img" tags ([img]) you write a link to the image you want displayed. For example: No longer needed, demonstration successfull! is shown by the following code Code: [img]http://www.ukipgloucestershire.org.uk/img/avatar.gif[/img] Which tells the software where to find the image.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-08-2005, 06:35 PM	#12 (permalink)
Alex McKee Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gloucester Posts: 6,661	You do! It's the img tag, in the post reply dialogue.

01-08-2005, 07:09 PM	#13 (permalink)
WindupMerchant Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,508	What do you do? Step by step please ops:

01-08-2005, 08:01 PM	#17 (permalink)
WindupMerchant Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,508	Thanks, I understood that I think. I'll try that some day

01-08-2005, 08:03 PM	#18 (permalink)
Alex McKee Moderator Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gloucester Posts: 6,661	You're welcome. If you only want to show the image for a day or two I will gladly put it online for you, but after a few weeks of it being on a forum it starts to take a lot of bandwidth up from my server. I'll take down the example now probably.

01-08-2005, 08:05 PM	#19 (permalink)
WindupMerchant Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,508	I'll remember the process :wink:

12-08-2005, 08:45 PM	#20 (permalink)
Matty84 Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Cambs Posts: 34	I wouldnt get too disheartened by that result. I live close to Cambridge, albeit in one of the uber conservative rural areas just outside. But knowing cambridge, or more specifically the Coleridge ward, many of the locals are either lecturers, many of whom most likely have strong connections to european academic establishments, or typical urban 'rip borders down' liberals who would sooner see us lose our sovreignty than govern our own affairs. Anyways, while im not saying the GE result, or this local one was a great positive indictment of UKIP, this area is not demographically representative, and UKIP shouldnt change to suit it. We cant beat labour at their own game, the tories have tried that for the past 8 years and failed. Miserably. That being said, i agree that UKIP could do with an overhaul, specifically in image and presentation. Most notably, we have a vision, a positive one, of self governance and determination. The task i guess, is communicating that across to the public. I guess UKIP is in a make or break position right now in securing the funding to make this possible, which will always be hard in that donors will want results, and we cant get results without funding. To state the obvious. is 30.42% regarded as good turnout?