UKIP should Practice what they preach

arden forester · 07-06-2005, 10:58 AM

Alex -

Quote:

The UKIP.org site is worse than my website

No, it's the other way round! Your website is far better than UKIP.org! :wink:

07-06-2005, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scotgirl

that may be true but for a party who has just recently been chuffed with themselves about the recent censure you would think that UKIP would want to get their forms in to show that they are not the same as the people they are trying to expose

by not putting them in it comes accross as hypicitical which i think is the point that UKIP watch are trying to make

I think UKIP watch could be downright liars! And I'm not in UKIP.

Quote:

In a hypocritical move UKIP MEPs this week ignored calls from their leader in the European Parliament, Nigel Farage, to disclose their financial declarations of interest on the Parliament's website.
The MEPs who last week were at the forefront of a censure motion against EU Commission President, Jose Barroso for an alleged conflict of interest, refused to declare their own earnings.

How does he know they ignored Farage's calls?
How does he know they refused to declare their interests?

There is a huge difference between a delay due to technical hitches or admin, and a refusal to declare and ignoring calls. How do you know which is true?

No wonder you're in the Lib Dems, you don't recognise spin.

Christina

Hartlepool · 07-06-2005, 11:23 AM

Well said CMUK64, and which fool posts this UKIPWATCH bias? Scotgirl,a Lib/Dem troll.

07-06-2005, 11:26 AM

Thanks Hartlepool, its my way of saying thank you to Anthony and UKIP for providing this excellent forum.

Christina

07-06-2005, 11:48 AM

Quote:

There is a huge difference between a delay due to technical hitches or admin, and a refusal to declare and ignoring calls. How do you know which is true?

Chrisina a claim was made on the UKIPwatch site and I asked if it was true then you come up with this elabrate reason saying that they may not know how to do it (well if they dont they should ask someone ) and now you are using your own theory as to what may have happened as a possible cause when nobody else has suggested that other than yourself

It would be nice to find out the actual reason though which is why i posted in the first place

Hartlepool - if i remember correctly you were posting incorrect information from a tory councillers website and try ing to pass it as fact

Hartlepool · 07-06-2005, 12:28 PM

I remember that only Scotgirl refused to accept "true facts"merely because of who posted them. Would she like all our posts and quotes to come from Lib/Dem sources? Her ideas that anything said or written about the Lib/Dems does not count if it is written by anyone but the Lib/Dems themselves. Only goes to show how crass her and the L/Ds really are.

07-06-2005, 12:43 PM

hartipool please try to remember what actually happened you made about half a dozan claims about the Lib dems refussed to name your sourse so eventually I went and looked at the documents itsself the info wasnt there

finally you gave me instuctions on where you got the info from which was a tory councillors webpage however if you look at the documents he was claiming had the information none of them did

the tory counciller had put misinformation there hoping that someone who could not be bothered to check thier facts would report it as truth and you come along and did just that, basically if someone claims something about a document its always a good idea to check the original document to see if it really does say whats claimed. the fact you fell for it rather than just assuming its something bad about the lib dems it must be true

same with this discussion we are currently having i posted something and asked if it was true someoen then off the top of thier heads comes up a theory not based on any proof just an idea and then trying to pass it off as a viable reason for it it to happen

at the end of the day UKIP, due to what they are trying to do over there should be whiter than white and lead by example not do as we say not as we do

Alex McKee · 07-06-2005, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arden forester

Alex -

Quote:

The UKIP.org site is worse than my website

No, it's the other way round! Your website is far better than UKIP.org! :wink:

aah that nice thanks! Makes a guy feel useful . . .

Bellatrix · 07-06-2005, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CMUK64

I've checked the Euro Parliament website and Nigel Farage has no declaration of financial interests either.

There may be another explanation.

I've just found it.

All MEPs have their registered financial interests registered with the EP and they are available for all to see if they go ask.

Hartlepool · 07-06-2005, 01:15 PM

SG,Your willingness to point out small chinks in everyones armour is well known.Perhaps you can extend your services to cover the cracks within the Lib/Dems own structure. Can you give us all the result of the Lib/Dem Candidate Jody Dunn's(Hartlepool) recent court case concerning her being charged with non payment of several rent instalments to her landlord who is a serving member of our armed forces. As you will know,the first case was found in favour of her landlord,do you have details of the second hearing? (All in the interests of Lib/Dem transparency of course. )

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-06-2005, 11:23 AM	#13 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,814 Party: Popular Democrats	Well said CMUK64, and which fool posts this UKIPWATCH bias? Scotgirl,a Lib/Dem troll.

07-06-2005, 11:26 AM	#14 (permalink)
Guest Posts: n/a	Thanks Hartlepool, its my way of saying thank you to Anthony and UKIP for providing this excellent forum. Christina

07-06-2005, 12:28 PM	#16 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,814 Party: Popular Democrats	I remember that only Scotgirl refused to accept "true facts"merely because of who posted them. Would she like all our posts and quotes to come from Lib/Dem sources? Her ideas that anything said or written about the Lib/Dems does not count if it is written by anyone but the Lib/Dems themselves. Only goes to show how crass her and the L/Ds really are.

07-06-2005, 12:43 PM	#17 (permalink)
Guest Posts: n/a	hartipool please try to remember what actually happened you made about half a dozan claims about the Lib dems refussed to name your sourse so eventually I went and looked at the documents itsself the info wasnt there finally you gave me instuctions on where you got the info from which was a tory councillors webpage however if you look at the documents he was claiming had the information none of them did the tory counciller had put misinformation there hoping that someone who could not be bothered to check thier facts would report it as truth and you come along and did just that, basically if someone claims something about a document its always a good idea to check the original document to see if it really does say whats claimed. the fact you fell for it rather than just assuming its something bad about the lib dems it must be true same with this discussion we are currently having i posted something and asked if it was true someoen then off the top of thier heads comes up a theory not based on any proof just an idea and then trying to pass it off as a viable reason for it it to happen at the end of the day UKIP, due to what they are trying to do over there should be whiter than white and lead by example not do as we say not as we do

07-06-2005, 01:15 PM	#20 (permalink)
Hartlepool Uber Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North East England Posts: 6,814 Party: Popular Democrats	SG,Your willingness to point out small chinks in everyones armour is well known.Perhaps you can extend your services to cover the cracks within the Lib/Dems own structure. Can you give us all the result of the Lib/Dem Candidate Jody Dunn's(Hartlepool) recent court case concerning her being charged with non payment of several rent instalments to her landlord who is a serving member of our armed forces. As you will know,the first case was found in favour of her landlord,do you have details of the second hearing? (All in the interests of Lib/Dem transparency of course. )