DON'T FORGET! PETRINA ON QUESTION TIME TONIGHT 22:35 !!!!!!

Intbel · 07-04-2005, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel Garage

A small party like UKIP doesn't normally send its party chairman onto TV programmes, because the party chairman isn't a public position.

Mebbe not.
However, as Petrina Baby is standing against Michael Blowhard that might make a slight difference.

Intbel · 07-04-2005, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

(he agrees she helps in this manner not in his ability to agree with a newbie like me lol)

Thanks for clearing that up Alex.
Matt can be somewhat ambiguous at times.

I only ask these questions so as to help him - when he is an MP he will be quoted verbatim and it will be no use saying "Ah, but what I meant was ..." that will not work. Folks will quote what he said or wrote and will assume that what he read or wrote is what he meant.

Alex McKee · 07-04-2005, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Intbel

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex

(he agrees she helps in this manner not in his ability to agree with a newbie like me lol)

Thanks for clearing that up Alex.
Matt can be somewhat ambiguous at times.

I only ask these questions so as to help him - when he is an MP he will be quoted verbatim and it will be no use saying "Ah, but what I meant was ..." that will not work. Folks will quote what he said or wrote and will assume that what he read or wrote is what he meant.

Absolutely. Good coaching and you have a flair for Pedantism - which he needs to experience more of lest he should come up against Jeremy Paxman lol.

Cheers,

mkpdavies · 07-04-2005, 10:30 PM

All coaching graciously received! Sorry I thought you had to be ambiguous, from watching years of Question Time!

Intbel · 07-04-2005, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkpdavies

All coaching graciously received ...

We'll look after you, no worries.

Alex McKee · 22-05-2005, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nigel Garage

My reply was obviously posted just too late for alex to read before he posted his reply.

Let me make a prediction for the benefit of UKIP members -

Veritas will gain one, maybe 2 or 3 seats (the one is RKS of course).
UKIP will do badly apart from a couple of good third places in the south west.
UKIP's leadership will blame Veritas for splitting their vote (this has already begun).
UKIP's members will be so angry and disillusioned that Nigel Farage, the master puppeteer, will put his post-election plan INTO phpbb_action. Knapman will be forced to step down (either as part of a pre-arranged agreement or a rigged AGM), and Petrina Holdsworth will be anointed leader (she's already being groomed for the role).
Of course, the real leader - and the cause of UKIP's problems - will still be pulling the strings.

Good prediction I don't think.
VERITAS did worse than UKIP by far.
UKIP did do badly indeed.
Not a word has been heard from UKIP about VERITAS splitting the vote.
Nigel F has not yet taken any action to force RK out.

1/4 Nigel Garage. That's an "D".

07-04-2005, 10:30 PM	#54 (permalink)
mkpdavies Uber Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Woking Posts: 30,604	All coaching graciously received! Sorry I thought you had to be ambiguous, from watching years of Question Time! __________________ http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode