British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > Anti-EU and Euroscepticism > UKIP General Issues


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2005, 03:47 PM   #21 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,152
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

But in this case only about 3500 people actually voted. Assuming, as a guess, that we could double that, we are still only talking about 7000 members voting, which would be £1470.

The ballots can still be sent with the magazine, just as a separate piece of paper. No need for envelopes or a separate postal delivery.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 06-03-2005, 06:37 PM   #22 (permalink)
Member
 
Percy the Poodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Devon
Posts: 362
Percy the Poodle is just starting out
Default

I found the ballot paper rather confusing as it had some of the candidate's blurbs on the back and i wondered if it was the right one. The lack of any numbering which would have been free also bothered me, but i am an optimist so i voted anyway.

The result was good though

I think the candidates should have to be members for a while before they can stand for the NEC to prove their commitment to the party. It would cut down the number of candidates which is a source of confusion to most members who will have only heard of 2-3 of the candidates.
Percy the Poodle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 10:47 PM   #23 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 91
Exorcist is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher
From the appalling turn out (and remember this is a postal ballot!), I would say that the majority of members think that the NEC is an irrelevance. This very much harps back to my "where do we go from here?" document - what is the point of the NEC at the moment?
Anthony

I doubt whether the majority of members think the NEC is an irrelevance. On the contrary they probably have no idea of their party's structure and the part the NEC is supposed to play in policy and decision making.

Most UKIP members are not politically active. They have probably paid their subscriptions, read the manifesto, read the quarterly UKIP magazines, voted UKIP, congratulated themselves on doing their bit to save their country and thought no more about it. I speak from experience having written to constituency members requesting help in our Association's activities. The response has been abysmal.

In answer to your question "what is the point of the NEC at the moment?"I would like to quote Gerrard Batten's NEC election address. Unfortunately it is on the back of my ballot paper in the waste paper bin of some distant office.

From memory he points out that, constitutionally, the NEC is UKIP's highest decision and policy making body and at the moment it is being side lined. This is a matter that requires urgent correction. That is why he got my vote.
Exorcist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 11:07 PM   #24 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,152
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

I actually meant what Gerard Batten was saying - the NEC doesn't appear to play a role in the running of the party at all. It meets once per month, which tells us that it cannot really be an active participant in the day to day running of the party.

Hence most people in the party don't take any interest. Had it been a leadership election, then the number of votes would have been a lot higher I expect.

While the NEC may technically be the highest decision making body, that doesn't appear to be the case in practice. I may of course be entirely wrong on that point; I am just talking as someone active in the party, but not involved in the running of things.

However, you will recall that the election strategy document was withheld from the NEC due to the leak. That suggests to me that there is clearly a decision making body above the NEC that chose to make that decision.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 11:29 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 91
Exorcist is just starting out
Default

My point is that there should not be a policy making body above the NEC.
Whatever this "higher body" may be it is unconstitutional, unaccountable and undemocratic.

I am suffering from deja vue. I started out wanting my country back. I end up wanting my party back as well.
Exorcist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 11:48 PM   #26 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,152
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exorcist
My point is that there should not be a policy making body above the NEC.
Whatever this "higher body" may be it is unconstitutional, unaccountable and undemocratic.
That would be the party leadership.

It seems a more sensible structure to me. The NEC is perhaps best reserved as an oversight body if it can only meet once per month. I think that the military hierarchy is a reasonable structure for getting things done, as long as it is properly accountable and monitored.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 12:42 AM   #27 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 91
Exorcist is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher
I actually meant what Gerard Batten was saying - the NEC doesn't appear to play a role in the running of the party at all. It meets once per month, which tells us that it cannot really be an active participant in the day to day running of the party.

.
The day to day running of the party is an administrative matter which has nothing to do with the intended role of the NEC. Constitutionally the role of the NEC is to form policy and make political decisions. To do this it can and should meet as often as required.
Exorcist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 12:47 AM   #28 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,152
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exorcist
The day to day running of the party is an administrative matter which has nothing to do with the intended role of the NEC. Constitutionally the role of the NEC is to form policy and make political decisions. To do this it can and should meet as often as required.
I am not sure that this is necessarily the best way of running things. I would have thought that political decision making should really be in the hands of the "shadow" cabinet; i.e. the people who would in theory have to implement the policies.
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2005, 12:49 AM   #29 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 91
Exorcist is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher
I think that the military hierarchy is a reasonable structure for getting things done, as long as it is properly accountable and monitored.
So did Stalin, Hitler, Saddam and Mussolini
Exorcist is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0