![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 46
![]() |
1 or 2 British MP's will announce our arrival on the political scene and give the millions of people who wish to leave Europe representation at Westminster which they do not have now and it will create greater media coverage and public awareness then ever before. It will give us the platform we have always sought. A vote of 20% everywhere and NO MP's will leave us in the political dark ages!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
|
Splendid descripton of McGregor, I whole heartedly concur!
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/ http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/ http://lpuk.org My ignore list Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 213
![]() |
too right my Island friend! (well... not that Thanet's an island any more but you know what I mean).
1 or 2 MPs and a lot of lost deposits = no real power; I keep getting told the message is more important than the party and a 20% polling in the election will force the issue more than 1 sitting MP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 303
![]() |
Thanet South is currently a Labour-held marginal, requiring about a 2.3% swing to the Conservatives for the Conservatives to take the seat. As such, without UKIP involvement it would probably remain marginal next time. Therefore both Labour and the Conservatives will campaign energetically for it.
In the 2001 general election, UKIP took just 1.3% of the vote in Thanet South. Persuading voters to vote UKIP is relatively easy. Persuading voters in a marginal to vote UKIP is another matter entirely. UKIP may have done well there in the European elections, but it might make more sense to target those constituencies where UKIP also has a track record of doing well in general elections (including perhaps the 6 seats where UKIP saved the deposit despite little, if any, publicity in 2001). However, Nigel Farage certainly knows his politics. If he wants to stand there, he must have a pretty good reason. So what is it? Aitken's old seat...that might just help with a few votes - but Aitken himself lost the seat in 1997 as a Conservative candidate. Perhaps the demographics of the seat are right? The media spin that UKIP take Tory votes is simply untrue. I tend to take LibDem votes when I stand in my local area. Maybe the argument is that if both Labour and the Conservatives are strong, fewer actual votes will be needed to take the seat. That doesn't seem to be a convincing reason, because you guarantee fighting two well-funded, well-organised major parties. We can't usually match them for activists. What does Nigel Farage know that we don't? I look forward to seeing him elected on polling day, but I can't help wondering what ace he's got up his sleeve. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]