![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erewhon
Posts: 5,638
![]() |
Some of the ads are better then the programmes
![]()
__________________
"That government is best which governs least." "This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries". "To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful." TANSTAAFL TANJ |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
|
What?!?!?!?!
What in the world does it have to do with the government, or any of its bodies, how many adverts can be shown?
__________________
Quote:
http://lpuk.org/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 247
Party: BNP
![]() |
I think we both will find this disturbing, but I agree.
__________________
"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see. " Enoch Powell |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Of course, it has been shown that most people cannot remember more than something like 3 adverts from a single ad break. So even if all restrictions were lifted, the channels should soon work out that having fewer ads would work out best as they could charge more for them.
The big broadcasters like the regulation though, i imagine, since they can demand higher fees. when advertising demand exceeds the available supply on all the channels, those with the largest audence shares can offer a better £/impressions value and so squeeze the ad revenues. Increasing the supply by lifting restrictions will simply devalue the existing capacity and so reduce the marginal ad revenue. The burden is borne by viewers who have to see more ads - i.e. more revenue in total but less revenue per ad minute. Greater restrictions on ad capacity would reduce overall revenue but increase revenue per ad minute.
__________________
http://vindicovindico.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erewhon
Posts: 5,638
![]() |
It is about revenue as the merged ITV is under a lot of pressure as other media streams mean that it cannot charge the high prices it used to do as it no longer delivers the audience size required as digital channels have fragmented the market
These means the restrictions place on ITV after the takeovers and mergers the are being relaxed
__________________
"That government is best which governs least." "This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries". "To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful." TANSTAAFL TANJ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]