![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
Quote:
Few would pay for the BBC if they were not forced to do so and it would fall apart very quickly as a single entity in its present size and form if it was made to earn its keep as all other broadcasters in the UK have to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Yes the license fee should be scrapped for good. The BBC should be fully commercialised and survive through subscriptions and/or advertising.
If it is necessary to have a public service element to our television programming, which i do not believe is necessary, then the money should be focussed on the content and not the distribution. The license fee (tax) is costly to administer, hits the poorest hardest, is archaic, and with digital technology it is unecessary. Lets get rid of it an return the cash to peoples pockets.
__________________
http://vindicovindico.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 587
![]() |
The BBC now has an income of £3.5 Billion per year-Guaranteed.
John Humphreys and Jeremy Paxman are having a little spat cocerning the way some of this money is spent: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770 One of the problems associated with a State funded broadcaster is the sheer inability to offer transparency in it's accounting procedures. Jonathan Ross-not one of my favourite broadcasters- has a contract worth £18 Million. No commercial broadcaster would have offered anywhere near this obscene amount of money for an 'Entertainer' of his calibre so if the BBC was privatised/commercialised his contract would either be renegotiated or not renewed. The BBC may claim to be 'Impartial' but if the person controlling the purse strings applies pressure-either political or financial- the claim of impartiality rings hollow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 22,896
![]() |
It is particularly disgraceful that the BBC 'elite' think it justified to force poor people to pay (through the television licence) for their fat salaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,015
![]() |
Quote:
Not that necessarily invalidates your points. I think some of the objection to the license fee is that you have to pay for it whether or not you use the service. But, in some ways, this is a specious argument. A product advertisement on commercial channel has to be paid for. That cost has to be funded from sales of the product and ultimately paid for by the customers - whether or not they watch that particular channel. Or indeed, any commercial channels. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]