+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 16 deaths in a North Sea helicopter crash. Fly and Die.

  1. #1
    Member Peter Dow is just starting out Peter Dow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Aberdeen, Scotland
    Posts
    110

    16 deaths in a North Sea helicopter crash. Fly and Die.

    From Scottish Republican News

    The reckless pursuit of oil and gas industry profits, as approved by the UK state, the Queen and her ministers, claimed 16 lives and made April fools of all North Sea workers. 1st April 2009.



    BBC: Helicopter crash probe continues

    B****** Salmond, ****** Brown and the ******* Queen all expressed fake concern for the lives of 16 workers lost but it was their fault they died.

    Oh sure, BP and Bond Helicopters are to blame too - but they operate with the agreement and under the regulations set by the state.

    The UK state passes no regulation, imposes no fine, which ever threatens the profits of the oil companies. That is the fault of the head of state, the Queen and her ministers of state - Prime Minister Brown and First Minister Salmond and their governments.

    Do Scottish, British and other workers want to die for these ********? I certainly don't.

    You wouldn't catch me commuting to an oil rig via helicopters which drop out of the sky like a stone when they fail.

    Oh helicopters can be made safer than that - if you are willing to pay. You don't often hear of "Marine One", the helicopter which carries the US President or the Queen's flight helicopter crashing with all lives lost, do you?

    But then the heads of state can spend the money on the safest helicopters, maintained and piloted in the safest possible way. Not so in the oil industry.

    When BP hands out the contracts for helicopter transport, do they choose the safest or the cheapest? They will SAY "safety is the priority" but we all know that profits are the priority so they will opt for the cheapest contracts they can get away with which save money at the expense of safety.

    If the North Sea industry can't afford to fly helicopters safely then they should ferry the workers by ship.

    Not forgetting the "Herald of Free Enterprise" ferry disaster of 1987 wherein 193 passengers died and the Titanic before that of course. So ships can be dangerous too, if you allow royalists any say in the way they are captained.

    With a stupid head of state, refusing to sack stupid ministers, you must expect stupid people in charge to cause death and disasters regularly.

    The only coherent solution is to have an intelligent head of state, a good president of a republic and a republican revolution to overthrow the monarchy and the UK is the right way to go. Workers could strike and demand a republican revolution to better their conditions of employment.

    If instead Scots and Britons insist on keeping on working for these royal twits then "be prepared to die in avoidable accidents" would be my warning.
    Last edited by Peter Dow; 04-04-2009 at 01:24 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Nyge21 has some supporters Nyge21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    South East
    Posts
    1,295

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dow View Post

    Do Scottish, British and other workers want to die for these ********? I certainly don't.
    Well they took the job - didnt they EXPECT to die doing it? Everyone knows helicopters are not the safest thing around - ah, what a pity for them!! Not happy to die eh? Talking of not wanting to die - I'm sorry, I've got an uncomfortable message - Remind me, how many of us here will escape death in 100 years from now ? 0% perhaps? 100 years on the scale of the age of the universe is nothing.

    You wouldn't catch me commuting to an oil rig via helicopters which drop out of the sky like a stone when they fail.

    Oh helicopters can be made safer than that - if you are willing to pay. You don't often hear of "Marine One", the helicopter which carries the US President or the Queen's flight helicopter crashing with all lives lost, do you?

    But then the heads of state can spend the money on the safest helicopters, maintained and piloted in the safest possible way. Not so in the oil industry.
    Are you having a joke with us - of course the oil industry can afford to spend the money - they have more money than the US president and the Queen combined!!! They are loaded (that might explain why the 'copters cant stay in the air!! )


    If the North Sea industry can't afford to fly helicopters safely then they should ferry the workers by ship.
    Oh don't worry, they can afford it - no question - but they'd rather give the money to a few execs in bonusses I expect.

    The only coherent solution is to have an intelligent head of state, a good president of a republic and a republican revolution to overthrow the monarchy.
    Is an intelligent head of state an oxymoron? We can be sure anyone elected will be a fool. After all, all our current politicians in any position of authority in their respective parties are.
    The system will not throw up anything better - that's guaranteed (unless you choose me as your head of state that's the only perfect solution)

  3. #3
    Member Peter Dow is just starting out Peter Dow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Aberdeen, Scotland
    Posts
    110

    Quote Originally Posted by Nyge21 View Post
    Is an intelligent head of state an oxymoron? We can be sure anyone elected will be a fool. After all, all our current politicians in any position of authority in their respective parties are.
    Well if political leaders (in the widest sense, including all those leading crowds out on the streets complaining about this that and the next thing apart from a foolish Queen as head of state) impeach and remove a foolish head of state then we can begin a political process towards an intelligent head of state rather than accepting the foolish Queen or her idiot son as head of state.

    We can proceed to an intelligent head of state if people are seized of the idea that the people and the military must impeach and remove a head of state (whether elected or a monarch) who is incapable and ineffective at performing essential head of state duties such as sacking PM Brown and FM Salmond.

    Removing a head of state, president or monarch is not only necessary for someone who is a crook like Nixon but it is also necessary for someone who comes from a family of honest and foolish Nazis.



    Wikipedia: Prince Christoph of Hesse

    Wikipedia: Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. Marriage

    American Almanac: The Nazi Roots of the House of Windsor

    Aftermath News: The Nazi relative that the Royals disowned

    The Daily Express: PRINCE PHILIP AND THE NAZIS

    The Royals and the Reich. The Princes von Hessen in Nazi Germany by Jonathan Petropoulos



    Jonathan Petropoulos, in his book "Royals and the Reich" reviews the case that the Duke of Windsor was a traitor and an agent for Nazi Germany which was made by Martin Allen in his book "Hidden Agenda. How the Duke of Windsor Betrayed the Allies".

    Author Martin Allen goes much further than this, arguing in his controversial book, Hidden Agenda, that the duke spied for Hitler, especially in the critical phase in late-1939 and early-1940 prior to the Battle of France.

    According to Allen, the duke made inspection tours of the French army's front line positions, including the Maginot line, and provided reports of troop deployments not only to the British (French-British co-operation not being what it should have been), but also to the Germans.

    The link between the duke and the Nazis, according to Allen, was wealthy American industrialist Charles Bedaux (sometimes spelled Bedault), who was a close friend of the Windsors. Bedaux had loaned them his home, chateau Cande in France, for their wedding in June 1937, and he was almost certainly a Nazi intelligence asset; he knew Goring personally and had many German business contacts.

    Martin Allen goes so far as to argue that the Duke of Windsor provided Bedaux with the crucial information about the French deployment, that this information, when passed on, induced Hitler to take the bold move and invade France through the poorly defended Ardennes forest, and that this is the primary explanation for the stunning Nazi victory in May-June 1940.

    It is a devastating indictment: the Duke of Windsor was not only a traitor but the main reason for the German victory in the West and all that came with it (occupation, the Battle of Britain, and the persecution of Jews in these regions, among other developments).
    Although the Duke of Windsor may not have been totally honest about his Nazi sympathies perhaps.

    Mostly people are brainwashed by ideas fed to them by the BBC that a seemingly harmless nice old lady like the Queen (and never mind all those Nazi family connections) is acceptable as a constitutional monarch and that changing to a republic is not desirable and certainly not any kind of priority.

    Well the BBC is wrong because we have ended up with a Constitution from Hell.

    I think the chances of unbrainwashing the British people via the internet are reasonably good in the long run.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nyge21 View Post
    The system will not throw up anything better - that's guaranteed (unless you choose me as your head of state that's the only perfect solution)
    OK let's see your website then.
    Last edited by Peter Dow; 04-04-2009 at 02:55 AM.

  4. #4
    Member Peter Dow is just starting out Peter Dow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Aberdeen, Scotland
    Posts
    110

    Anyway, what have you got against the Lib Dems? I know what I have got against them here in Scotland.


  5. #5
    Trusted Member angelman is a jewel in the rough angelman is a jewel in the rough angelman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    here
    Posts
    4,734

    Peter, you are a very strange chap. When you got arrested at the Uni, they should have had you sectioned.

    Posted via Mobile Device

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts