![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 134
![]() |
On 26 August 2008, The Daily Mail reported thus:
Quote:
Shortly before Magdi Elgizouli launched the assault upon Pauline, he had attacked a police officer. And yet, even though he was carrying a 7in bladed knife at the time of the attack, even though he had been sent to a special hospital following an unprovoked attack against a stranger in 1992, the police had bailed him. Pauline and her husband were working in their chemist's shop when Pauline saw Elgizouli steal a tooth brush. When she confronted him, he punched her to the floor and kicked her. Pauline said: Quote:
The Sussex constabulary were well aware that Elgizouli had a long history of violence and was receiving mental health treatment under the Care in the Community scheme, so why was he given bail after being apprehended for attacking one of their own? Specifically, why was this violent knife-carrying nutcase allowed out to attack someone else? The attack upon the policeman wasn't an isolated incident either. Just before that incident he had been arrested and bailed for arson! So, a care-in-the-community patient, who has been arrested and bailed twice in the previous ten days for violent, life-threatening behaviour, is arrested for the attack on Pauline and found to be in possession of another long-bladed knife. Guess, what happened next, folks? The Sussex police force bailed Magdi Elgizouli yet again! You really could not make it up, could you? The boys-in-blue would later say that they had freed Elgizouli because they had no concerns about him. Do you get this? The cops were not concerned about a violent knife-carrying nut, who had a desperately nutty RECENT history of anti-social violence, being out here in the community with the rest of us. It's war, ladies and gentlemen, it really is war. It's a war that is being carried out by those at the top of the tree against those at the bottom and in the middle. It is a war that is being waged by those we always thought were duty-bound to protect us. Whereas, in fact, they have been busy, over the years, arranging that the safeguards our ancestors put in place to keep us from harm, are removed. A lovely, young woman would pay the ultimate price in this war. On 24 October 1997, 25-year-old WPC Nina Mackay was murdered in Stratford, East London. Magdi Elgizouli, the aforementioned schizophrenic, stabbed Nina to death as she entered his East London flat as as part of an armed team sent to arrest him for jumping bail. Bail that had been granted by Highbury Corner magistrates with so litle thought for the consequences. Nina had insisted on being the first through the door and had removed her body armour in order to get a better swing at the door with the battering ram she was using. The same undeclared war that ushered Nina into her grave determines, nowadays, that young women like her must put themselves in harm's way in precisely the same way that men do. Thus, when a plucky, female police officer's body armour is ill-fitting, uncomfortable and an impediment to her taking her turn with the battering ram, rather than her male colleagues taking over, she will loosen that ill-fitting armour, considerably lessening her chances of survival if attacked. And, in this PC day and age, her colleagues will choose to say nothing for fear of being labelled sexist. In court, Elgizouli denied murder but admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility. Which is the standard plea in cases like this. His barrister, Bruce Houlder QC, said Elgizouli was a deeply religious man. He also said that he believed that he was about to be beaten and raped by the officers sent to arrest him. Which is a typical thing that a loony-tune might come out with in a British court these days, by way of explanation for his murderous behaviours. Following the publication of a report commissioned by Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster and East London and the City health authorities, along with the London councils of Westminster and Newham, Nina's father, retired Chief Superintendent Sidney Mackay, posed the question: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
At his trial, in April 1998, Sir Lawrence Verney, the Recorder of London, ordered Elgizouli to be kept in Rampton with no time limit. However, on the 21 February 2005, The Evening Standard reported thus: Quote:
Quote:
The only people who could imagine that a Magdi Elgizouli is capable of positive change would be your fully paid up members of the PC Crowd. Correction: your fully paid up members of the leafy-suburbian PC Crowd. Whom he is unlikely to be bothering. Your average inner city PC activist, on the other hand, wouldn’t want him out and about in their neck of the woods any more than I would. He wouldn’t be able to admit it, of course, given the nature of the long war he's been waging against the decent, but, believe you me, he’d be making arrangements to go live in Dorset, alongside Billy Bragg, as soon as he heard the loony-tune was back in town. It is war, ladies and gents. Even if it sometimes takes those who wage that war three years more than originally planned to get a second-generation immigrant footsoldier back to the killing fields, it is war. Jack Straw, Eleanor Laing, Harry Greenway, Tony McNulty and Vincent Cable mentioned Nina Mackay in the House of Commons. None of them mentioned the name and/or ethnicity of her killer. Tony Banks, the former New Labour MP for West Ham, did not see fit to mention the PC who lost her life in his constituency. Here is a picture of a second-generation Sudanese psychopath who will soon be just as free as he likes to do to others what he did to Nina Nackay. Pictured below is the beautiful, British woman Elgizouli killed. ![]() Tony Banks was ennobled by Tony Blair in 2005 and took the title Lord Stratford. For a few of his PC credentials, go here: I Am An Englishman Lord Stratford died whilst on holiday in Florida, in January 2006. He was Jewish. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
![]() |
The succession of racist and anti-Semitic rants by the instigator of this thread (and so many other similar) though still illegally racist and illegally anti-Semitic, has now passed through being offensive, then annoying, on to irritating, boring, tedious, and has now become mildly amusing.
You’re a joke, “Jack”. But that’s just my opinion.
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Uber Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]