British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2008, 06:06 PM   #21 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,582
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Thanks WPCIS.

Lazyguy, to clarify because you're missing the point here(probably deliberately).

I said, "the British government are censoring political websites right now." which is true.

You said that I said it is "government wide" when I clearly I did not.

of course, I can still access these sites myself.
If it were "government wide" then I wouldn't be able to.

I don't know why you're laughing because you made the wrong claim but can't admit it.
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP,agni,Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 05-08-2008, 06:22 PM   #22 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,582
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
If the government are already encouraging ISP providers to write to file sharers and have also proposed laws whereby all the sites visited by users are kept then the excrement could be hitting the cooling device

Just wait til IP6 comes along and you have a unique address the thought police will be on your doorstep quicker then Gordon the Moron can raise another tax

You seem quite well informed on this subject ghall.

May I ask, when you say "unique address" don't people already have a unique IP address when they surf ? What about where there are many users in the same location using the same access point ?

I don't pretend I know a huge amount about this subject.

Thanks in advance.

By the way - funny joke, such a shame it's actually true.
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP,agni,Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 06:35 PM   #23 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,582
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default Breaking story today

Just in.........

Law Professor: Counter Terrorism Czar Told Me There Is Going To Be An i-9/11 And An i-Patriot Act

"Lawrence Lessig, a respected Law Professor from Stanford University told an audience at this years Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, California, that “There’s going to be an i-9/11 event” which will act as a catalyst for a radical reworking of the law pertaining to the internet."

During a group panel segment titled “2018: Life on the Net”(watch video clip in article), Lessig stated:

""There’s going to be an i-9/11 event. Which doesn’t necessarily mean an Al Qaeda attack, it means an event where the instability or the insecurity of the internet becomes manifest during a malicious event which then inspires the government into a response. You’ve got to remember that after 9/11 the government drew up the Patriot Act within 20 days and it was passed."".

Infowars states:

"Many believed that the legislation was a response to the attacks of 9/11, but the reality was that the Patriot Act was prepared way in advance of 9/11 and it sat dormant, awaiting an event to justify its implementation."

"Now we discover that exactly the same freedom restricting legislation has already been prepared for the cyber world."
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP,agni,Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 09:24 PM   #24 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erewhon
Posts: 5,638
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by youcanhandlethetruth View Post
You seem quite well informed on this subject ghall.

May I ask, when you say "unique address" don't people already have a unique IP address when they surf ? What about where there are many users in the same location using the same access point ?

I don't pretend I know a huge amount about this subject.

Thanks in advance.

By the way - funny joke, such a shame it's actually true.
IP addressing currently uses 4 octets i.e. 255.255.255.255, obviously there are some restricted addresses. Your ISP has a range of addresses it can use and if I remember correctly (and please jump in if you know better) it assigns a port number to each user when online which is not easily archived.

however IP6 is 255.255.255.255.255.255 which gives a shedload more numbers for use and hence makes it easier to archive individual addresses
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."
TANSTAAFL
TANJ


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 10:07 PM   #25 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oxonia
Posts: 3,987
Aardvark has some supporters
Default

Presumably every individual would get a unique IP from his/her ISP? It would make moderation easier as we would identify sockpuppets efficiently rather than by way of educated guesses. It would make individuals easier to identify and target by those with no scruples.
__________________
When in Woking do as the Wokes do.

"I do not wish to form my opinions by thoughtlessly quoting others; I wish others to support their opinions by sensibly quoting me." Paul Wesson (Aardvark) 13th April 2008
Aardvark is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:44 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
whypatcondellisntfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 841
whypatcondellisntfun is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
IP addressing currently uses 4 octets i.e. 255.255.255.255, obviously there are some restricted addresses. Your ISP has a range of addresses it can use and if I remember correctly (and please jump in if you know better) it assigns a port number to each user when online which is not easily archived.
I'm not sure about a unique port number for each user. For instance, the default port number for a web site is port 80, a single web server can run multiple websites all using port 80. It is likely that we are all using port 80 to access this forum, for instance.

Our ISPs do assign us unique IP addresses and can potentially track the sites we visit, not only that, this forum could potentially track our individual IP addresses and perhaps be able to tell where we are down to country/city level.

Combine the data from sites which track IP addresses with the data from ISPs who know which users have which IP addresses and that is a powerful tool. Has anybody else here heard of Phorm?

I always thought IPV6 was a bit like BT having a number changeover to accommodate more telephone numbers, they are apparently running out of IP addresses so need to make more. I didn't think IPV6 gave any extra tracking abilities as 'they' can already track you if 'they' know your IP address. I could be wrong.

More on IPV6 here.
More on port numbers here

If you want to hide your IP address from the websites you are visiting use a proxy server. Your ISP will still know your IP address, but none of the sites you visit will, and possibly your ISP will have a harder time tracking which sites you are visiting.

If anybody has any corrections to the above, please let me know
__________________
"I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin" - Enoch Powell
whypatcondellisntfun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 01:51 AM   #27 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,582
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Thanks very much for that useful information guys.

WPCIF, where is the option on Windows to "use a proxy server" ?

Cheers.
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP,agni,Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist

Last edited by youcanhandlethetruth; 06-08-2008 at 01:53 AM. Reason: Added question
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 01:55 AM   #28 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
youcanhandlethetruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,582
youcanhandlethetruth is just starting out
Default

Ooops I've just seen it's in "instructions to use a proxy server".

Sorry didn't see that......
__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits(in order of Porkpies) Clippo,Wowbanger TIP,agni,Akria,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist
youcanhandlethetruth is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 08:22 AM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
whypatcondellisntfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 841
whypatcondellisntfun is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark View Post
Presumably every individual would get a unique IP from his/her ISP? It would make moderation easier as we would identify sockpuppets efficiently rather than by way of educated guesses. It would make individuals easier to identify and target by those with no scruples.
Indeed. The only thing to watch out for in this regard are corporate networks which will be assigned an 'external' IP address which will hide all their 'internal' IP addresses. So somebody who works at a place with say, 50 other employees each with their own PC is effectively 'sharing' an external IP address with 49 other people, although they do have their own individual IP address within the corporate network.

Same concept with small home networks on broadband. They will be assigned an 'external' IP address which is used by the broadband router, and which all computers on the network will route through.

To check for sock accounts using IP addresses would remove some of the guesswork as I suppose the same IP address will be used within the same space of time to access multiple accounts. I'm sure organisations like YouTube use this to quickly clamp down on people who are banned and who then just start a new account.

If you are using a broadband router which you leave switched on all the time you will have been using the same IP address since your router logged on to your ISP. To get a new IP address (although this may be no guarantee) try switching your router off, and then back on again and see if you have a new IP address. The instructions for your router will tell you how to check the IP address the router is using.
__________________
"I have set and always will set my face like flint against making any difference between one citizen of this country and another on grounds of his origin" - Enoch Powell
whypatcondellisntfun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 01:48 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
John Connor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hard Working Families' Socialist Republic of Untied Kingdomistan
Posts: 1,054
Party: None
John Connor has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aardvark View Post
Presumably every individual would get a unique IP from his/her ISP?
Some ISPs already do this as a matter of course. Demon and Zen, for example, hand out fixed IP addresses already - makes it easier for the user to run servers.
__________________
There are three types of people in this world: Libertarians, fascists and those who haven't been paying attention.

Users on ignore list: Akria, Besoeker, Clippo, david H, Ian C.
John Connor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0