British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2008, 12:49 PM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,225
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

That anecdote is old, boring and mostly a straw man. Anyone who tries to disprove God through sight is a moron.

EUSSR, you attack a form of atheism held only by a very small mintory (and I believe it is an untenable position).

However, agnostic atheism - of which the vast majority of atheists are a part - is not a faith.
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 05-07-2008, 12:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ANZAC-Land
Posts: 486
NoMoreEUSSR is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to NoMoreEUSSR Send a message via Skype™ to NoMoreEUSSR
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
However, agnostic atheism - of which the vast majority of atheists are a part - is not a faith.
This discussion recently took place on another forum in which I participate. It boils down to definitions of the terms "agnostic" and "atheist" really. What you have described above I have always tended to lump into the "agnostic" category, in contrast with "fundamental" atheism - the concrete belief in the non-existence of God - which is a faith.
NoMoreEUSSR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 01:03 PM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,225
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreEUSSR View Post
This discussion recently took place on another forum in which I participate. It boils down to definitions of the terms "agnostic" and "atheist" really. What you have described above I have always tended to lump into the "agnostic" category, in contrast with "fundamental" atheism - the concrete belief in the non-existence of God - which is a faith.
Then you would be wrong.

An atheist is someone who does not believe in God.

What you call 'fundamental atheism' would be called gnostic atheism in philosophy.

The two terms are completely distinct. The fact is, an atheist is someone who does not believe in God. It pertains to believe. Gnosticism and agnosticism concern knowledge.
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel

Last edited by Smidgey; 05-07-2008 at 01:09 PM.
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 01:24 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
BonnieDundee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,809
BonnieDundee is just starting out
Default

Quote:
An atheist is someone who does not believe in God.
In some ways you can say he is correct if the word belief is used. Belief, at least to me, implies faith.

Most athiests to me seem to be strong agnostics as compared to more weak agnostic such as myself.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state."
-Bruce Schneier

How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.
Edward Abbey

Leopold Kohr.
BonnieDundee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 05:49 PM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erewhon
Posts: 5,638
g hall has some supporters
Default

first question Define God
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."
TANSTAAFL
TANJ


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 12:56 AM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,225
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
In some ways you can say he is correct if the word belief is used. Belief, at least to me, implies faith.

Most athiests to me seem to be strong agnostics as compared to more weak agnostic such as myself.
Not at all. Faith is a type of belief, but not all belief is faith - far from it. Unless you are being facetious and would claim that my belief that I will fall back to earth when I jump is a faith position because I cannot know with absolute certainty that the laws of gravity will remain true. Obviously I cannot, but such cases are so absurd and would water down the definitions of belief and faith to make them almost meaningless.

I don't think agnosticism is a tenable position in any way (except for those agnostics who claim that any question concerning God is unanswerable and irrelevant).

If someone claims to be any other kind of plain agnostic, then they are - by default - also an atheist. There are two positions: Either you support Manchester United or you do not (theist and atheists). Those who have never heard of the team Manchester United clearly do not support them (the agnostics). Agnostics are also atheists (unless they define themselves as above).
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 12:56 AM   #17 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Smidgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,225
Party: Libertarian Party
Smidgey is just starting out
Send a message via MSN to Smidgey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
first question Define God
None of the Christians on this forum like to answer that one... For obvious reasons!
__________________
How vain is man, who boasts in fight the valour of gigantic might!

-Georg Friedrich Händel
Smidgey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 08:42 AM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
The Bear is just starting out
Default

A definition of god require bringing in the infinite, and once that is done the need for a god goes out the metaphorical window.
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 09:25 AM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,758
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
There is no god.

End of story.
The fool hath said...
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 09:28 AM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
For_England's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,873
For_England is just starting out
Default

yeah, err, optimistic, nice story, but Islam can't be conclusive of other religions. You see, it contradicts the Bible, but at the same time it appeals to the Bible for its own authority, and even urges that its teaching be compared with the Bible to see if it is true. It fails the test.
For_England is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0