News: This Is Peaches

Jack Black · 02-07-2008, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kali Morrigan

Why did you feel the need to post about Peaches Jack Black? If You're trying to make a point here, surely a cross-section of backgrounds and race would have at least been a plausible attempt at researching crime gangs.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

Do you know how many BLACK gang members there are in London compared to white?

Didn't you notice that ALL 27 of the the teenagers murdered in London last year were murdered by BLACKS?

Have you bothered to research the last five or six British Crime Surveys?

No, of course you haven't!

Well, here's a little FACT that doesn't fit in with your leafy-suburbian, leaflet-learned view of the world:

A precise extrapolation from the homicide statistics of last two British Crime Surveys and the 2001 census will tell you that an individual black person is 103/115 times more likely to murder an individual White person than the other way around in this country!

A cross-section?

Where is it? Where has it been? The tame media tells us remorselessly about the Stephen Lawrences, who tells us about the Peaches?

Stephen Lawrence has been mentioned over a thousand times in the Houses of Parliament. Those indigenous Brits who have been murdered by the first and second-generation immigrant population since Stephen was killed have been mentioned less than 250 times ALL TOLD.

That means, according to your average parliamentarian, Stephen Lawrence is more than 4,000 times more important than your average Briton murdered by an alien!

A cross section of backgrounds?

Trust me, Kali Morrigan, if you are a politically correct type, who puts pro-immigrant propaganda before the reality, a precise cross section of crime and criminals is THE LAST THING you want aired at this forum.

The Bear · 03-07-2008, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Black

[b] Do you know how many BLACK gang members there are in London compared to white?

Didn't you notice that ALL 27 of the the teenagers murdered in London last year were murdered by BLACKS?

Have you bothered to research the last five or six British Crime Surveys?

And have you put aside your nasty little race hatred mindset and wondered if there was another factor at play? Have you considered crime in the past where some sectors of society were statistically more likely to be involved than others? At how when times changed and those same people moved within society the criminality did not move with them?

Of course not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Black

[b] Well, here's a little FACT that doesn't fit in with your leafy-suburbian, leaflet-learned view of the world:

A precise extrapolation from the homicide statistics of last two British Crime Surveys and the 2001 census will tell you that an individual black person is 103/115 times more likely to murder an individual White person than the other way around in this country!

Instead of seeing the colour of a persons skin why not instead look at the sector of society they have to live in.

Criminality in the East End of London has been a fact of life for hundreds of years, as has criminality in all slum areas, yet when the people climb the social ladder the criminality remains behind.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Black

A cross-section?

Where is it? Where has it been? The tame media tells us remorselessly about the Stephen Lawrences, who tells us about the Peaches?

On that I must agree. She faced immense difficulties, overcame them, and is now a classic example of what utterly invalidates your race hate argument.

Trust me, Kali Morrigan, if you are a politically correct type, who puts pro-immigrant propaganda before the reality, a precise cross section of crime and criminals is THE LAST THING you want aired at this forum.

You are so silly!

The precise cross section of crime and criminals, when presented in context and in an historically perspective showing the effects that social deprivation has on people is exactly what is required, not the mindless rubbish that places blame simply out of hatred and prejudice .... and fear of having to face a changeing world where you have to face facts that there are no Ubermenschen after all, and you will have to join your imagined Untermenschen and simply become one of the ordinary people in the new “Rainbow Britain” that is emerging..

Mikeuk · 03-07-2008, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

And of course you showed support for that ***** Thatcher.

Your hatred for the greatest statesperson of the second half of the 20th century tells us all we need to know about you.

Compared with the giantess Margaret Thatcher you are a stunted hate-crazed dwarf.

twizzel · 03-07-2008, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UkipHM

All black people must be automatically like her then.

I hope that was said tongue in cheek, I policed Stonebridge park estate in Harlesden London 80%of the people on that estate were from ethnic minority groups, if you took 20 or so of the street gang and dumped them in mid atlantic that estate would be the quitest place on earth peopled with a diverse population who would all live together in harmony.

twizzel · 03-07-2008, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aardvark

I don't mind people escaping the sink estates and doing well in life, but I wonder if the lady has made any attempt to recompense, or even apologise to, her victims. Sinners stopping sinning is one thing, sinners repenting is another in its entirety.

Marriage documents are an artificial construct of the 16th century and are not referred to in the Bible. Two people who live together for their whole life without a piece of paper are more fortunate than those who have the piece of paper and discover that they're in the wrong relationship.

Mike, all humans fart at least 8 times a day. On a balance they do it in church as well. I'm sure I must have as I have spent a seemingly inordinate anount of time in churches and Christian services - only 3 this year I'm afraid so I won't be at the top table and nor will the hypocrites who are there every week and preach morality without love and compassion to or for their fellow men.

People who fart in church are always invited back. The invite to the Lord's supper is universal and eternal for all those who believe. Farting doesn't remove faith nor does it remove the right to attend any Church of England service at any time a person wishes since nobody can be excluded from the state church, ever. As those who know realise this means you may attend a confirmation, wedding, funeral or baptism at any CoE church without invite or notice. They are public ceremonies and nobody has the right to exclude anybody from them, farting or not.

At last you have posted something I can agree with.

BonnieDundee · 03-07-2008, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Your hatred for the greatest statesperson of the second half of the 20th century tells us all we need to know about you.

Compared with the giantess Margaret Thatcher you are a stunted hate-crazed dwarf.

Your support for the b*tch and for Franco tells us all we need to know about you. She was the worst PM since Walpole.

Mikeuk · 04-07-2008, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

Your support for the b*tch and for Franco tells us all we need to know about you. She was the worst PM since Walpole.

Don't be ridiculous. You are saying she was worse than traitor Heath.

What's your problem with Thatcher? Don't like a woman PM eh?

BonnieDundee · 04-07-2008, 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Don't be ridiculous. You are saying she was worse than traitor Heath.

I didn't mention traitors. I think it is hard to throw around such words today.

Quote:

What's your problem with Thatcher? Don't like a woman PM eh?

I personally don't like her monetarism and what she did to workers and the poor. She combined the worst of "market fundamentalism" and bigotry. What power she took from the state she put into the hands of large corporations. That is almost as bad in my book, in some ways it is worse because it often wears names like increasing individual freedom or freeing entreprise.

I will admit my intense dislike of her is probably greaty influenced by what I though her in the past when I held different political views, particularly my teenage bland social democracy. I suppose she is probably due a re-evalution and though I still don't much like her she probably isn't that much worse than many other political figures.

Mikeuk · 04-07-2008, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BonnieDundee

I didn't mention traitors. I think it is hard to throw around such words today.

Sadly we hear it less since the untimely departure of Matt Davies whose 'Happy Deathday' card for Heath caused much hilarity.

Quote:

I personally don't like her monetarism and what she did to workers and the poor. She combined the worst of "market fundamentalism" and bigotry. What power she took from the state she put into the hands of large corporations. That is almost as bad in my book, in some ways it is worse because it often wears names like increasing individual freedom or freeing entreprise.

I will admit my intense dislike of her is probably greaty influenced by what I though her in the past when I held different political views, particularly my teenage bland social democracy. I suppose she is probably due a re-evalution and though I still don't much like her she probably isn't that much worse than many other political figures.

Thatcher made many mistakes, among them permitting her enemies to gain positions of influence.

Next time no Mister Nice Guy.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode