British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-06-2008, 02:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
kernow has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher View Post


WRT gay couples, I think that gay parents would be preferable to a single parent.
There are far too many kids brought up by awful parents to worry about whether the good ones are gay or unmarried.
I'm totally against Gays adopting Children! In my opinion a child needs a Father and a Mother of opposite sex for a balanced upbringing! Of course there will be bad parents there always have been. Are Gays always good parents? Why would Gays want children anyway?
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 21-06-2008, 03:01 PM   #12 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,205
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
I'm totally against Gays adopting Children! In my opinion a child needs a Father and a Mother of opposite sex for a balanced upbringing!
Surely two parents would be preferable to a single parent generally speaking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
Are Gays always good parents?
No. The point was that what really matters for a child is how good the parents are, rather than whether they are gay or married.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
Why would Gays want children anyway?
Being gay doesn't mean having a personality removal. Sexual preference doesn't, presumably, influence maternal/paternal instincts.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled!
Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 03:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
kernow has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher View Post
Surely two parents would be preferable to a single parent generally speaking?


No. The point was that what really matters for a child is how good the parents are, rather than whether they are gay or married.


Being gay doesn't mean having a personality removal. Sexual preference doesn't, presumably, influence maternal/paternal instincts.
(a) Of course two parents are preferable, but not same sex!

(b) No one knows whether people will make good parents or not until after the children are born.

(b) Barring Gays from adopting Children at least halves the possibilities of a disaster for the child.

I was born short, through no fault of my own. People are born Gay through no fault of their own! I can never play in a Basket Ball league, tough!
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 04:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,205
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
(b) No one knows whether people will make good parents or not until after the children are born.
Given the requirement for gay parents to go through fostering/adoption, there is indeed a prerequisite suitability that heterosexual parents don't have to go through, unless they are also fostering/adopting. Foster parents have to go through tests and training before they can take on a child.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
(b) Barring Gays from adopting Children at least halves the possibilities of a disaster for the child.
The only issue that I can see is with societal problems. For a child raised in a gay couple I doubt very much whether they would have any issues at all - it will only be other kids teasing that might cause a problem. Kids get teased for just about everything anyway, so I am not convinced that it is a big deal.

If you are suggesting that gay people would make worse parents (ignoring societal bigotry), I am not sure what you are basing that on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
I was born short, through no fault of my own. People are born Gay through no fault of their own! I can never play in a Basket Ball league, tough!
No, but you can raise kids. I really can't see what the issue is in principle. What are the prime requirements for being a parent:

1. Loving the child
2. Being able to provide for the child (financially)
3. Providing a good education

Which of these do you think that a gay couple couldn't provide because they are gay?
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled!
Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 05:55 PM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,184
kernow has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Butcher View Post

I really can't see what the issue is in principle. What are the prime requirements for being a parent:

1. Loving the child
2. Being able to provide for the child (financially)
3. Providing a good education

Which of these do you think that a gay couple couldn't provide because they are gay?
I agree , your 1,2 and 3 are essential in bringing up a child, but they still need a balance that only a Mum and Dad of the opposite sex can provide!
kernow is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 06:52 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 859
Roland is just starting out
Default

If a child is adopted by two gay parents it's fate is sealed before it has even started. It will spend it's entire child hood being bullied and picked on. As a result of this will have problems in education, identity and may well absolutely resent it's adopted parents. It is a recipe for disaster.

The child would not only have the problem of coming to terms with the situation with it's real parents but would also have the situation of dealing with it's adopted parents.

You can well make the argument that a normal couple may not make good adopted parents but at least society would have done it's best to start it in as natural surroundings as possible.

Children should not be for social engineering experiments ever.
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 07:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,205
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland View Post
It will spend it's entire child hood being bullied and picked on. As a result of this will have problems in education, identity and may well absolutely resent it's adopted parents. It is a recipe for disaster.
You could say exactly the same about having parents who are fat, poor, ginger, chavs, posh, wealthy, ugly or Labour voters. Kids get teased because their parents' car is old or because they don't wear the right trainers. One kid at my prep school was constantly teased because his mum had a big bum. As I recall, it wasn't even that big.

Having two loving parents, gay or not, is exactly what a kid needs to get over the teasing...

I just don't see this rampant homophobia that you think will plague their lives. I live in an area with a big mix of backgrounds and wealth, and I don't recall seeing or hearing any genuine homophobia (and we do have a few gay couples around).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Millennium3 View Post
Children should not be for social engineering experiments ever.
I completely agree. I think that what we are disagreeing about is whether it is social engineering any longer.
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled!
Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 07:09 PM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, Alabama of United States of America
Posts: 155
Party: Other
Darth Bane is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to Darth Bane
Default

I see both sides of this debate. To allow a homosexual couple with the rights to adop is like perpetuating a cycle that can get out of hand. For example, a child brough into this world would think it a societies responsability to accept them and think that it's a god practice to be with the same sex. As we all know two sexes cannot have kids naturally. However, it might decrease the population sizes unless immigration says otherwise. What us americans and britainish peoples should do is decrease immigration and not support pregnancies through the government. We should in practice is to stop early teenage pregnancies in a perfect world. What is the definition of normal anyways? I have no problem with the same sex adopting children at least they have somewheres to go where as the normal family of the nuclear family is accustomed to reprocrating themselves. I think people want kids to pass thier own Panderora's box genetical lines with thier x and y chromosomes to thrive. Society is not fully ready for this universal idea of homosexuals of having children until then it won't change!
Darth Bane is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 07:17 PM   #19 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anthony Butcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Ashton, Bristol
Posts: 10,205
Party: None
Anthony Butcher is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Bane View Post
To allow a homosexual couple with the rights to adopt
This is completely irrelevant to your point, but I think that parenthood should be regarded as a very serious responsibility, not a right. Parents unable to properly provide for their child are in serious breach of that responsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Bane View Post
For example, a child brough into this world would think it a societies responsability to accept them and think that it's a god practice to be with the same sex.
I am pretty sure that kids don't learn to be gay...
__________________
If you care about what's in your food and where it comes from, then get it labelled!
Label My Food - http://www.labelmyfood.org.uk
Anthony Butcher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2008, 07:18 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 859
Roland is just starting out
Default

I am genuinly not homophobic I can't imagine any one wanting to bat for the wrong team it's just the way they are born.

I've had friends who are gay and it really dose not bother me unless they start kissing which sorry but turns my stomach unless of cause they're lesbians which is another story all together.

I just think in the eyes of many who want to change society that gay adoption should be promoted in that one day it will be seen as acceptable which may be one day it would but as far as i'm concerned end's do not justify means.

It would at the end of the day amount to social engineering and the children that would go through the social adjustment stage would have one hell of a hard time.

Yes kid's taunt each other but the kind of taunting those kids would get would be at another level.
Roland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0