Gay 'Star' to be divorced by boyfriend

Vortex · 20-06-2008, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

I don't have to. I don't like it. It's also condemned by the Bible.

Do you have to answer for your personal likes and dislikes? I mean you may have a big yellow tricycle with a horn rather than a cute red one with a bell, but your choice is between you and daddy - nothing to do with me.

I can remember when that crowd were locked up. They should be damned glad we no longer do that. (Mind you they got all the sex they wanted in gaol)

And when the nasty BNP point out that the Islamification of Britain will lead to persecution of homosexuals the like of which they have not seen before, what will he do then? Scream "islamaphobia" at us or "homophobia" at them?!

The Bear · 21-06-2008, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

I have just as much right to state my reactions as Junior has to bleat endlessly about the BNP. He doesn't like the BNP; I don't like buggery. It's a personal lifestyle choice.

Homosexual attraction is not a question of choice, people don’t choose to be GAY, it’s a matter of orientation. In any case there’s a whole lot more to a loving relationship between two people than sex. If anything the sex side is a spin off to the much greater affinity and, yes, LOVE that two people experience.

As regards the physical side of a relationship, why is it that is always the first and often the ONLY aspect about a homosexual relationship that is slammed on the table.

Isn’t the emotional relationship that two people engage in the important thing, the closeness, the affection, the security, the commitment, the want to live jointly as one, just the same as we feel to our different sex partners?

The really ironical part is that with only one exception the sexual activities that a homosexual couple engage in are precisely the same as a heterosexual couple.

Sort of puts it into perspective eh?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikeuk

Personally I'm happy to let them get on with whatever it is they do as long as they keep a low profile and don't demand 'equality' with the rest of us.

By “low profile” I take it to mean that you would want them to keep their affection for each other or people with the same sexual orientation hidden from those who do not.

Why on earth SHOULD they keep a “low profile”?

It’s just as ridiculous as to expect US to keep a “low profile” regarding our sexual orientation from "THEM"!

Maybe the rationale beyond why you propose this “low profile” approach is to be discovered in your unwillingness to accept that people with a homosexual orientation ARE equal to us, and WE are EQUAL to "THEM".

The reality is that there is no US and THEM, ther's just US

Vortex · 21-06-2008, 10:18 AM

MikeUK is absolutely right. The situation is quite simple. Man and woman natural. Man and man unnatural. As Mike opines, they can do whatever they want in private, but I for one do not want to see their perversion flaunted openly on the streets.

The Bear · 21-06-2008, 11:18 AM

Homosexual relationships do not necessarily have to extend to being sexual relationships.

A close long term bond between two same sex people is often an unrequited homosexual relationship as was so well illustrated in the recent film Brokeback Mountain where events moved the relationship from emotional to the physical.

Moreover homosexual relationships are not simply a human thing, they are not in the least uncommon in nature.

Maybe it’s that I a confident in my own sexuality that lets me feel at ease with others engaging in the sexuality that suits them, whilst others have a hidden fear that they might not be quite as far along the continuum of sexuality as they would like to be.

Because continuum it is. There is no, or very few examples of absolute 100% male or absolute 100% female in people.

We are all of us somewhere on a line that stretches between the two exceedingly rare extremes and those who are at the extreme usually have other quite major personality defects or disorders accompanying their often bipolar sexual orientation.

Smidgey · 21-06-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vortex

MikeUK is absolutely right. The situation is quite simple. Man and woman natural. Man and man unnatural. As Mike opines, they can do whatever they want in private, but I for one do not want to see their perversion flaunted openly on the streets.

You should probably stop posting on this forum then, since it is unnatural for you to do so. Or are we only following a made-up version of nature that suits your opinions?

British-Conservatism · 21-06-2008, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UkipHM

Both lead actors play women in Little Britain. I thought gender-swapping had a long history in theatre and entertainment?

You are offensive and insulting (I know that's nothing new to you) and haven't yet provided a reason for your evident homophobia. You seem to think that his personal choice of whom he loves is worthy of inhuman status and treatment. So why?

I love these words like homophobia.
Homophobia as the great Chubby Brown said "is the fear of gays, I fear a dick up my ****".

British-Conservatism · 21-06-2008, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UkipHM

I certainly think that if you are going to say - indeed start a new thread - that somebody should be treated as if sub-human because of their sexual orientation, you should provide a reason, yes.

As Mike hit a nerve.
Are you a homosexual?

British-Conservatism · 21-06-2008, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bear

Homosexual relationships do not necessarily have to extend to being sexual relationships.

A close long term bond between two same sex people is often an unrequited homosexual relationship as was so well illustrated in the recent film Brokeback Mountain where events moved the relationship from emotional to the physical.

Moreover homosexual relationships are not simply a human thing, they are not in the least uncommon in nature.

Maybe it’s that I a confident in my own sexuality that lets me feel at ease with others engaging in the sexuality that suits them, whilst others have a hidden fear that they might not be quite as far along the continuum of sexuality as they would like to be.

Because continuum it is. There is no, or very few examples of absolute 100% male or absolute 100% female in people.

We are all of us somewhere on a line that stretches between the two exceedingly rare extremes and those who are at the extreme usually have other quite major personality defects or disorders accompanying their often bipolar sexual orientation.

So Bear have you dabbled with homosexuality then?

British-Conservatism · 21-06-2008, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smidgey

You should probably stop posting on this forum then, since it is unnatural for you to do so. Or are we only following a made-up version of nature that suits your opinions?

I think it's time people here put their cards on the table in terms of sexuality.
You have swerved the question a few times how about you be open with all of us.

The Bear · 21-06-2008, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by British-Conservatism

So Bear have you dabbled with homosexuality then?

LOL! Not knowingly!

Recently it's been difficult enough to dabble in heterosexuality since my wife, several years my junior, started her “change”!

21-06-2008, 11:18 AM	#14 (permalink)
The Bear Uber Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: East Anglia Posts: 2,178	Homosexual relationships do not necessarily have to extend to being sexual relationships. A close long term bond between two same sex people is often an unrequited homosexual relationship as was so well illustrated in the recent film Brokeback Mountain where events moved the relationship from emotional to the physical. Moreover homosexual relationships are not simply a human thing, they are not in the least uncommon in nature. Maybe it’s that I a confident in my own sexuality that lets me feel at ease with others engaging in the sexuality that suits them, whilst others have a hidden fear that they might not be quite as far along the continuum of sexuality as they would like to be. Because continuum it is. There is no, or very few examples of absolute 100% male or absolute 100% female in people. We are all of us somewhere on a line that stretches between the two exceedingly rare extremes and those who are at the extreme usually have other quite major personality defects or disorders accompanying their often bipolar sexual orientation. __________________ I am an old man. I have eaten much salt.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

21-06-2008, 10:18 AM	#13 (permalink)
Vortex Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,056 Party: BNP	MikeUK is absolutely right. The situation is quite simple. Man and woman natural. Man and man unnatural. As Mike opines, they can do whatever they want in private, but I for one do not want to see their perversion flaunted openly on the streets.