Akria

Brainwashed, or perhaps merely sane and reasonable?
I would argue the latter.

__________________
I am getting very tired of people not reading my posts properly.
Please do not reply to me unless you are sure you have not missed out the key points I am making and key words I am using.

http://real-democracy.co.uk | Admin and proud

The commonality of mankind:
If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh?
If you poison us, do we not die?

Clippo

Thank you for your agreement & support BonnieDundee.

Clippo

YCHTT wrote:-
Coming from you that is the biggest joke I've seen for years.

In E&E where I post most frequently, I have repeatedly asked posters who disagree with my point of view to post scientific facts to support their opinions. They have never done so - and Britannist is a prime example.

Furthermore, aeons ago it seems like, in the 'complaints' section in response to mpkdavies calling people '..... fascist.... ' who challenged his perverse opinions, I actually recommended that people should back up their opinions with fact (preferably peer-reviewed)
AND
of interest to you I would think, I actually called for a 'Conpsiracy theories' sub section.

It's there in the record - go find it.

youcanhandlethetruth

Coming from the person that is pushing the man made global warming lie I expected nothing else

The fact you called for a "conspiracy theories" section proves you have no interest in dealing with hard facts

Yes indeed it's in the record Mr "scientific" !

Most honest people are well aware I have always mostly pointed to facts, hard evidence and reliable sources in my posts.

Yes they should compare my posts to yours and see who is really backing up their claims with hard evidence.

And if you are so "scientific" Clippo why are you one of the least liked members on this forum ?
Just look how many people have you on their ignore list )

The fact that you said "posters who disagree with my point of view" is interesting too.

__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits: Akria,Clippo,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist,MikeUK

youcanhandlethetruth

Something I forgot to add too.

The basis of your (apparently scientific) argument is always "Here is my opinion, try to disprove it", rather than "Here are the facts, try to disprove it".

That's how the new "scientific revolution" attempts to re-write reality and science.

__________________
Before tyranny and television, "conspiracy theorists" never existed.

cointelpro/halfwits: Akria,Clippo,Besoeker,Bear,Eurosceptic Antlantacist,MikeUK

Clippo

YCHTT wrote:-

This is, of course, a typically ‘subjective’ opinion of yours. ‘Popularity’ is meaningless in many areas of human discourse. For example, Churchill was very unpopular with huge swathes of the British population, as was / is Thatcher. In debate & politics, there are winners and losers. In the losing group, there are some who reflect and recognise that their opinions were incorrect to a greater or lesser degree. There are also some losers who will never accept they were wrong and retire from the debate (judge for yourself who they are here). Then there are those who delude themselves and retreat into fantastical unprove-able conspiracy theories.
In the scientific debate about GW, I am, with quite a few others here, certainly still on the winning side whereas you can judge for yourself what category you personally fall into.
&
I see I am on your ignore list – pity you can’t practice what you preach

&
Okay, have it your way, between the eyes, :-

The scientific facts, generated by thousands of independent scientists around the world indicate with a greater than 90% probability that Global warming is real and the major causes are due to mankind’s activities. Of these activities, the facts support, highly significantly, that CO2 emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels is the greatest cause.
Now you please try to disprove it using facts !

David Agnew

Sorry to hear that. Goodbye.
Quite.

Yes I agree, interesting contributors are rare. The company on here is getting more and more depressing: the tiresome BNP, chippy nationalists.. and some American bullshitting about Ireland.
Yes, he's always good value. He talks sense and his posts are well informed and thoughtful. The best poster on the forum.
I might be joining you.

Britannist

Thank you very much for your kind comments (above) David. I am very grateful. Much appreciated.

Britannist

I am sorry you feel this way Clippo.

I shall decline to respond to you actual comments in view of the unfortunate tone you have used against me in posting 19 to this thread.

Mikeuk

Took a look but I can't say I'm very impressed. It has just over 50 members and some of the posts are about God knows what.

Maybe I was just unlucky but the first (and last) thread I looked at consisted of posts like this: