British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-05-2008, 11:59 PM   #21 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
tito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Pembrokeshire
Posts: 3,035
tito is just starting out
Send a message via AIM to tito Send a message via MSN to tito
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk View Post
I can't get over the sailor who cried when his ipod was taken away from him by the Iranians. Of course they're recruiting poofters these days so the armed services are clearly going to the dogs.

Remember that fool who said he was fighting for women's rights in Afghanistan and promptly got his head blown off. Serve the stupid bugg*r right.

I'm paying his wages and I couldn't give a toss about women's so-called rights in Afghanistan. What people do in sh*tholes like Afghanistan is their business and has nothing to do with us whatsoever.
Unless they threaten us...



__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayn Rand
"Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good."
For life, Liberty and Prosperity
http://lpuk.org/
tito is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 19-05-2008, 07:03 AM   #22 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,122
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
You really need to look at an atlas and see that some of these little islands are important staging posts and I'm sure the Gibraltarians will have something to say about Spain and the USE.
The British residents of Gibraltar will simply wake up one morning and like the Spanish realise that they along with the Southern Irish and the Northern Irish AND the Scots AND the Welsh and all the other piffant little “countries” and realise that they are nothing more than at best states of the USE.

As for the fourteen or so little islands, they WERE of value but today with the exception of the Falklands because of its potential as an oil producer, are of no use to Britain whatsoever and are actually a simply a net cost to us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
A lot of piracy happens now how do you thing the British Empire evolved trade and the Navy - read some history.
The piracy that is taking place is not being affected by the Navy nor could it be.

The days of The Empire are LONG gone and the piracy is on goods being transported not from parts of the British Empire but from overseas nations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
Some American politicians where bias against the UK in WW2 Joe Kennedy for example but many others helped and supported as did many ordinary Americans.
The US were content to provide arms to both sides in WW2 until they were dragged following Pearl.

One reason for the US NOT getting involved until they were brought in as a result of the axis between Japan and Germany was the unwillingness of the MAJORITY of the American people to get involved.

Had Japan not been an Axis power it is probable that the US would have limited its actions to the Pacific.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
The big thing we can thank the Russians for is complicity with the Nazis in invading Poland which kicked off WW2 but I suppose people who don't study history and geography will continue to make idiotic statements like that.
Certainly the issue of the taking of territory that had been a part of Germany, Prussia, Russia, and Austria to create a modern state of Poland as part of the Treaty of Versailles was a key factorresulting in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and that resulted within a week with the Polish Campaign by Germany.

There is however a strong argument that the retaking of what had been parts of Germany etc. was in fact the rightful restoration of lands to the nations of which they were a part as was also the invasion / liberation of the Sudetenland.

Remember, history is written by the victors.

IF the argument that Germany et al should NOT have tried to restore their territory, then that opens the possibility of raising very interesting questions regarding both Israel and Iraq not to mention present day Turkish borders.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
I'm sorry Bear but many of your comments seem to be made without resorting to facts which as I said before is idiotic
If that is what I was doing then I would agree but I argue that I am not.
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2008, 08:04 AM   #23 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
BonnieDundee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,362
BonnieDundee is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Westcountryman View Post
I consider the armed forces to be vital to defending the realm and defending British interests abroad.
Defence perhaps but "defending our interests abroad" means sticking our nose in other people's business and usually causing more trouble than it is worth not to mention being a menance to our own liberty.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state."
-Bruce Schneier

How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.
Edward Abbey

Leopold Kohr.
BonnieDundee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2008, 08:14 AM   #24 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
BonnieDundee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Between Mallaig and Cornwall.
Posts: 2,362
BonnieDundee is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk View Post
The Tories weren't too worried about a standing army in the time of the Stuarts. They changed their tune after the Hanoverian/Whig seizure of power.
Well the Tories at the period, as always, were made up of many factions much like the Whigs. But the constitutional or Clarendonian tories of 1641 and the similar, later "country" sections of the party with their attachment to Church and King(usually in that order.) and the "ancient" constitution of England were quite opposed to standing armies particularly after their experience with Cromwell and his standing army. Of course Charles II was less against standing armies but the "country" section of the Tories were always suspicious of them as they were foreign wars.
__________________
"It is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday facilitate a police state."
-Bruce Schneier

How to Overthrow the System: brew your own beer; kick in your TV; build your own cabin and p*ss off front porch whenever you bloody well feel like it.
Edward Abbey

Leopold Kohr.

Last edited by BonnieDundee; 19-05-2008 at 08:25 AM.
BonnieDundee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2008, 01:50 PM   #25 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,927
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
The British residents of Gibraltar will simply wake up one morning and like the Spanish realise that they along with the Southern Irish and the Northern Irish AND the Scots AND the Welsh and all the other piffant little “countries” and realise that they are nothing more than at best states of the USE.
And at that point what do you think will happen ?

Quote:
As for the fourteen or so little islands, they WERE of value but today with the exception of the Falklands because of its potential as an oil producer, are of no use to Britain whatsoever and are actually a simply a net cost to us.
These are they and I don't think that they are a net cost for the value we get
British overseas territories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Quote:
The piracy that is taking place is not being affected by the Navy nor could it be.

The days of The Empire are LONG gone and the piracy is on goods being transported not from parts of the British Empire but from overseas nations.
A life time ago and we still have the Commonwealth of Nations and if we had a proper Navy it could do a lot

Quote:
The US were content to provide arms to both sides in WW2 until they were dragged following Pearl.
Prove it

Quote:
One reason for the US NOT getting involved until they were brought in as a result of the axis between Japan and Germany was the unwillingness of the MAJORITY of the American people to get involved.

Had Japan not been an Axis power it is probable that the US would have limited its actions to the Pacific.
Funny that the yanks were already defending themselves against the Germans

Quote:
Certainly the issue of the taking of territory that had been a part of Germany, Prussia, Russia, and Austria to create a modern state of Poland as part of the Treaty of Versailles was a key factorresulting in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and that resulted within a week with the Polish Campaign by Germany.

There is however a strong argument that the retaking of what had been parts of Germany etc. was in fact the rightful restoration of lands to the nations of which they were a part as was also the invasion / liberation of the Sudetenland.
That's ok then but on that basis you can keep going back until it all belongs to the neanderthals

Quote:
Remember, history is written by the victors.

IF the argument that Germany et al should NOT have tried to restore their territory, then that opens the possibility of raising very interesting questions regarding both Israel and Iraq not to mention present day Turkish borders.
Shame you appear not to read it then although in fact books have been written by the losers as well
Are you going to give the USA back to the Native American Indians - thought not
Quote:
If that is what I was doing then I would agree but I argue that I am not.
And you can argue black is white but you will be wrong - again
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2008, 02:37 PM   #26 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,122
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
Originally Posted by The Bear
“The British residents of Gibraltar will simply wake up one morning and like the Spanish realise that they along with the Southern Irish and the Northern Irish AND the Scots AND the Welsh and all the other piffant little “countries” and realise that they are nothing more than at best states of the USE.”

And at that point what do you think will happen ?
Rather sooner than later based on the state of the British economy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
These are they and I don't think that they are a net cost for the value we get
British overseas territories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
LOL! I certainly do! With the possible exception of The Falklands, WHAT value?

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
(When) we still have the Commonwealth of Nations and if we had a proper Navy it could do a lot.
But we don’t and we couldn’t afford to anymore. The Commonwealth is a joke. A thing well past its sell by date and a thing to disband sooner rather than later.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
Quote: The Bear
“The US were content to provide arms to both sides in WW2 until they were dragged following Pearl. “

Prove it
Let’s start with Henry Ford and his supplying Germany with military equipment, or on the subject of Ford how about the use of slave labour at its German plant before the attack on Pearl but after the start of war between Britain ad Nazi Germany.

Then let’s move on to ITT, Coca Cola, IBM, in fact the list just goes on and on.

Good business if you can get it. It’s all there to be found and verified by orthogonal searches.

ITT is particularly interesting since ITT took n million dollars in compensation form the US government for damage caused to its German factories during WW2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
Quote: The Bear
“One reason for the US NOT getting involved until they were brought in as a result of the axis between Japan and Germany was the unwillingness of the MAJORITY of the American people to get involved.

Had Japan not been an Axis power it is probable that the US would have limited its actions to the Pacific.”

Funny that the yanks were already defending themselves against the Germans.
But not having declared a state of war, limited only to defending shipping convoys that contained American vessels, and charging us the earth for every item that was sent to us for use in the war just as US companies were charging our enemies for every item sent to them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
Quote:
"Certainly the issue of the taking of territory that had been a part of Germany, Prussia, Russia, and Austria to create a modern state of Poland as part of the Treaty of Versailles was a key factorresulting in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and that resulted within a week with the Polish Campaign by Germany.

There is however a strong argument that the retaking of what had been parts of Germany etc. was in fact the rightful restoration of lands to the nations of which they were a part as was also the invasion / liberation of the Sudetenland."

That's ok then but on that basis you can keep going back until it all belongs to the neanderthals
WW1 was a watershed. The dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and the punitive measures taken against Germany set the scene for what was soon to follow and what is still taking place today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by g hall View Post
Quote: The Bear
“Remember, history is written by the victors.

IF the argument that Germany et al should NOT have tried to restore their territory, then that opens the possibility of raising very interesting questions regarding both Israel and Iraq not to mention present day Turkish borders. “

Shame you appear not to read it then although in fact books have been written by the losers as well

Are you going to give the USA back to the Native American Indians - thought not
Actually I believe that the genocide and theft of what is now North America is amongst the greatest crimes that have been perpetrated on an indigenous people anywhere.
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2008, 04:40 PM   #27 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,381
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
Well the Tories at the period, as always, were made up of many factions much like the Whigs. But the constitutional or Clarendonian tories of 1641 and the similar, later "country" sections of the party with their attachment to Church and King(usually in that order.) and the "ancient" constitution of England were quite opposed to standing armies particularly after their experience with Cromwell and his standing army. Of course Charles II was less against standing armies but the "country" section of the Tories were always suspicious of them as they were foreign wars.
Yes that's true, but in the end the 'Highflyers' won and Clarendon was banished.

It was on that memorable occasion that his enemy the Duchess of Portsmouth insulted Hyde as he departed and he turned to her and declared.

'Madam, if you live, you shall grow old.'
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2008, 10:36 PM   #28 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,927
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
Let’s start with Henry Ford and his supplying Germany with military equipment, or on the subject of Ford how about the use of slave labour at its German plant before the attack on Pearl but after the start of war between Britain ad Nazi Germany.
Ford and General Motors protested that they had no influence over wartime events in Germany which from a multinational level is I expect true how would they be allowed to communicate with the plants also I suspect that the NAZI's would have simply commandeered the plants anyway as for what happened before 1939 again I suspect that the local directors would have seen that they could increase profits and of course if they were German they would have been loyal to their country
I would guess that many other people would have been happy to work at these and other plants after sept 1939 to earn money especially if their ancestry was German

Quote:
Then let’s move on to ITT, Coca Cola, IBM, in fact the list just goes on and on.

Good business if you can get it. It’s all there to be found and verified by orthogonal searches.

ITT is particularly interesting since ITT took n million dollars in compensation form the US government for damage caused to its German factories during WW2.
The CEO of ITT was named Sosthenes Behn whose ancestry was Franco German of course this is the problem with capitalism it's all about the bottom line and profit.
Same with IBM and on that point it's why I'm against ID cards
The problem is once you have a subsidiary in another country that country's nationals will increasingly run it and of course it is to be expected that certain nationalistic traits will shine through to think otherwise is to be either stupid or naive

Quote:
But not having declared a state of war, limited only to defending shipping convoys that contained American vessels, and charging us the earth for every item that was sent to us for use in the war just as US companies were charging our enemies for every item sent to them.
Capitalism !

Quote:

WW1 was a watershed. The dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and the punitive measures taken against Germany set the scene for what was soon to follow and what is still taking place today.
You and the rest of us can blame the French for that

Quote:
Actually I believe that the genocide and theft of what is now North America is amongst the greatest crimes that have been perpetrated on an indigenous people anywhere.
Why do I get the feeling that you are anti American ? still at least unlike the Russians and Chinese they have a liberal democracy - is that what affronts your socialist control freakery
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2008, 05:47 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
British-Conservatism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,159
British-Conservatism is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
Bear, you and I are as far apart as Irish Catholics and Protestants. ( but not I hope, as far as we'll blow each others heads off!) I will never change my opinion on the EU and I doubt if you will either, so there's no point in you and I debating with each other any subject that involves the EU!
Ohh he would but only when the EU is an Islamic state in 40 years.
But the left never see ahead in a realistic manner.
British-Conservatism is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2008, 06:30 PM   #30 (permalink)
Member
 
Harbinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 159
Party: None
Harbinger has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeuk View Post
I can't get over the sailor who cried when his ipod was taken away from him by the Iranians. Of course they're recruiting poofters these days so the armed services are clearly going to the dogs.

Remember that fool who said he was fighting for women's rights in Afghanistan and promptly got his head blown off. Serve the stupid bugg*r right.

I'm paying his wages and I couldn't give a toss about women's so-called rights in Afghanistan. What people do in sh*tholes like Afghanistan is their business and has nothing to do with us whatsoever.
What a touching epiitaph to a soldier who gave his life.
Harbinger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
Armed Forces, UKNDA

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0