British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-05-2008, 06:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
Newbie
 
Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1
Party: None
Henry is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I believe the majority of people think that the quality of the armed forces has declined. It seems every day on the news there's a story detailing the latest faulty equipment or the poorly supplied soldier dodging bullets. The equipment itself, design-wise, is highly advanced. I'd suggest the professionalism of the army has detiorated rather than the ability of the fighting force.

Although yet more reductions in the size of the Navy is a little saddening
Henry is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 18-05-2008, 09:40 AM   #12 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kernow View Post
I don't think anyone who cares about this Country now actually thinks we have a World class fighting force anymore. The reason we haven't can be firmly placed at the door of those British S**t H****s who are gagging for Britain to be locked into a EU Superstate!
No, the reason that Britain doesn’t have a world class armed services is that Britain is no longer a world class nation and so can’t and moreover SHOULDN’T try to have a world class armed services beyond that which is necessary to defend Britain.

Note the word DEFEND.

What Blair did was send out what had been reduced to a defence force to be a belligerence force.

As for Europe, we must differ, I am an absolute supporter of full integration of Britain into Europe at all levels. That includes an EU military force.

In my opinion the path that the US is following is becoming more and more US centered and that is more and more NOT in our and indeed Europe’s interest. If we are going to get into bed with others those others should not include the US.

A good start would be to get the US bases and especially their early warning facilities the hell out of Britain and Europe.
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 11:08 AM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
VanillaSpice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 27
VanillaSpice is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The military is not just a national force but a natural one. They can merge.
VanillaSpice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 12:46 PM   #14 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
No, the reason that Britain doesn’t have a world class armed services is that Britain is no longer a world class nation and so can’t and moreover SHOULDN’T try to have a world class armed services beyond that which is necessary to defend Britain.
And defend her interests abroad. We have numerous territories and shipping lanes to defend.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
A good start would be to get the US bases and especially their early warning facilities the hell out of Britain and Europe.
Why? It's in our interest to have US troops here.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 01:08 PM   #15 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
The Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 2,178
The Bear is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
And defend her interests abroad. We have numerous territories and shipping lanes to defend.
All that I can think about are a bunch of inconsequential little islands that with the possible exception of the Falklands aren’t worth the effort, and Gibraltar that will soon be a part of Spain anyway as we all become a single USE.

As for the shipping lanes, get real.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
It's in our interest to have US troops here.
Having the US forces in Britain makes us a target for any aggressor intent on attacking the US especially if we continue to put up with their radar outposts here and in the rest of Europe, radar that forms a part of the US defence shield and does Sweet Fanny Adams for us or Europe.

The idea that the US would come galloping to our aid if we were in danger was blown out of the water with the outbreak of WW2 where with the exception of selling armaments to both sides the US did nothing for us alone until they were given a bloody nose at Pearl Harbour.

We actually have far more to thank the Russians for than the US, had it not been for Hitler going after the USSR in the (correct) belief that he had crushed Britain he world have had his forces invade us and the US would have done NOTHING.
__________________
I am an old man. I have eaten much salt.
The Bear is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 01:22 PM   #16 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
kernow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,016
kernow has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post

As for Europe, we must differ, I am an absolute supporter of full integration of Britain into Europe at all levels. That includes an EU military force.
Bear, you and I are as far apart as Irish Catholics and Protestants. ( but not I hope, as far as we'll blow each others heads off!) I will never change my opinion on the EU and I doubt if you will either, so there's no point in you and I debating with each other any subject that involves the EU!
kernow is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 01:27 PM   #17 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
All that I can think about are a bunch of inconsequential little islands that with the possible exception of the Falklands aren’t worth the effort, and Gibraltar that will soon be a part of Spain anyway as we all become a single USE.

As for the shipping lanes, get real.
'Get real'? DO you have any idea how heavily the UK relies on shipping? 95% of all goods traded by the UK arrive or depart by sea. Protecting shipping lanes is a no-brainer. Also, defending British subjects abroad (ie. Falklands etc) is necessary if only out of principle. That you would abandon countrymen in their time of need is disgusting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
Having the US forces in Britain makes us a target for any aggressor intent on attacking the US especially if we continue to put up with their radar outposts here and in the rest of Europe, radar that forms a part of the US defence shield and does Sweet Fanny Adams for us or Europe.
Being a leading nation in both NATO and Western Europe we're a target anyway. I also disagree that having US troops stationed here doesn't bring any benefit to Europe. Providing a base of operations allows for quick deployment to Europe, Africa and the middle east if necessary. It also means that should any NATO member be attacked, there are already US troops in Europe able to respond.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
The idea that the US would come galloping to our aid if we were in danger was blown out of the water with the outbreak of WW2 where with the exception of selling armaments to both sides the US did nothing for us alone until they were given a bloody nose at Pearl Harbour.
The US did send not only equipment, but also advisors and service personnel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
We actually have far more to thank the Russians for than the US, had it not been for Hitler going after the USSR in the (correct) belief that he had crushed Britain he world have had his forces invade us and the US would have done NOTHING.
Correct belief that he had crushed Britain? Really, so what was the Battle of Britain all about then? We were walking in Berlin in 1945.

The USSR may have sacrificed the most during the war, but that in no way belittles the effort of the other Allies.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."

Last edited by Westcountryman; 18-05-2008 at 01:30 PM.
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 08:40 PM   #18 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
g hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: erehwon
Posts: 5,233
g hall has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bear View Post
All that I can think about are a bunch of inconsequential little islands that with the possible exception of the Falklands aren’t worth the effort, and Gibraltar that will soon be a part of Spain anyway as we all become a single USE.
You really need to look at an atlas and see that some of these little islands are important staging posts and I'm sure the Gibraltarians will have something to say about Spain and the USE


Quote:
As for the shipping lanes, get real.
A lot of piracy happens now how do you thing the British Empire evolved trade and the Navy - read some history

Quote:
Having the US forces in Britain makes us a target for any aggressor intent on attacking the US especially if we continue to put up with their radar outposts here and in the rest of Europe, radar that forms a part of the US defence shield and does Sweet Fanny Adams for us or Europe.

The idea that the US would come galloping to our aid if we were in danger was blown out of the water with the outbreak of WW2 where with the exception of selling armaments to both sides the US did nothing for us alone until they were given a bloody nose at Pearl Harbour.

We actually have far more to thank the Russians for than the US, had it not been for Hitler going after the USSR in the (correct) belief that he had crushed Britain he world have had his forces invade us and the US would have done NOTHING.
Some American politicians where bias against the UK in WW2 Joe Kennedy for example but many others helped and supported as did many ordinary Americans
The big thing we can thank the Russians for is complicity with the Nazis in invading Poland which kicked off WW2 but I suppose people who don't study history and geography will continue to make idiotic statements like that.
I'm sorry Bear but many of your comments seem to be made without resorting to facts which as I said before is idiotic
__________________
"That government is best which governs least."
"This is a sharp Medicine, but it is a Physician for all diseases and miseries".
"To be "matter of fact" about the world is to blunder into fantasy --and dull fantasy at that, as the real world is strange and wonderful."


g hall is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 09:55 PM   #19 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,650
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonnieDundee View Post
That depends on your viewpoint. Jefferson and Jeffersonian democracy considers a standing army a menace to liberty, as did many Tories in the 18th and 17 centuries.
The Tories weren't too worried about a standing army in the time of the Stuarts. They changed their tune after the Hanoverian/Whig seizure of power.

Last edited by Mikeuk; 18-05-2008 at 10:02 PM.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2008, 10:02 PM   #20 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Mikeuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fareham
Posts: 5,650
Party: Conservatives
Mikeuk is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry View Post
I believe the majority of people think that the quality of the armed forces has declined. It seems every day on the news there's a story detailing the latest faulty equipment or the poorly supplied soldier dodging bullets. The equipment itself, design-wise, is highly advanced. I'd suggest the professionalism of the army has detiorated rather than the ability of the fighting force.

Although yet more reductions in the size of the Navy is a little saddening
I can't get over the sailor who cried when his ipod was taken away from him by the Iranians. Of course they're recruiting poofters these days so the armed services are clearly going to the dogs.

Remember that fool who said he was fighting for women's rights in Afghanistan and promptly got his head blown off. Serve the stupid bugg*r right.

I'm paying his wages and I couldn't give a toss about women's so-called rights in Afghanistan. What people do in sh*tholes like Afghanistan is their business and has nothing to do with us whatsoever.

Last edited by Mikeuk; 18-05-2008 at 10:04 PM.
Mikeuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
Armed Forces, UKNDA

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0