British Democracy Forum
Web | Images | Groups | News | Advanced
Google
Worldwide Results UK Focused Results

Go Back   British Democracy Forum > The Lounge > Talk About Anything


You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
View Poll Results: Is theft for the greater good O.K.?
Yes 2 14.29%
No 11 78.57%
Don't know 1 7.14%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-02-2008, 04:30 PM   #21 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
How would you solve that problem?
Local areas would need to identify who was commiting the crime and punish them suitably.


Quote:
Those that do pay for their rubbish to be picked up by private companies are going to be charged a lot more than they are charged now
I would say the opposite. Just because you don't have the government forcing you to use it, doesn't mean a lot of people wouldn't choose to get together or even trust their local government to make arrangements. People would be much more aware of their responsibilites and the consequences for harming others.

There would be less political skulldagary with contracts and with zero tax, many more companies able to set up and compete.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote

You can remove this advert by logging in or registering
Old 16-02-2008, 04:53 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
John Connor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Away for Summer
Posts: 829
Party: None
John Connor has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleopatra View Post
O.K for starters, take the rubbish collection. Those that do not pay are obviously not going to have their rubbish picked up, those that do pay are likely to have an increase in fly tippers. Those that do not pay and simply dump their rubbish anywhere are going to cause a rat epidemic in this country. How would you solve that problem?
It's easy. If they don't want their rubbish taking away, they don't pay to have it taken away and it must remain on their property until they dispose of it via legal means (i.e. at the tip).
__________________
There are three types of people in this world: Libertarians, fascists and those who haven't been paying attention.

Users on ignore list: Akria, Besoeker, Clippo, david H, Ian C.
John Connor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 04:55 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
John Connor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Away for Summer
Posts: 829
Party: None
John Connor has some supporters
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleopatra View Post
Those that do pay for their rubbish to be picked up by private companies are going to be charged a lot more than they are charged now, the reason that many of our services are affordable via the tax payment method is to do with bulk buy.
Oops, missed that bit.

I know a bloke in Texas who has his rubbish taken away by a private company. $20 a year, no limit, collections three times per week.

Yes, you read that correctly. $20 a year.
__________________
There are three types of people in this world: Libertarians, fascists and those who haven't been paying attention.

Users on ignore list: Akria, Besoeker, Clippo, david H, Ian C.
John Connor is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:01 PM   #24 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smidgey View Post
The cardinal rule of all political philosophy should be that 'the ends never justify the means'.

So, no. Theft is immoral.
No, what's immoral is denying education and healthcare to those who can not afford it. Can't afford to send your kids to school? That's ok then, no education for them. Got cancer, but can't afford the treatment? Have a nice death.

A libertarian would let an orphan starve and die unless someone agreed to take them in. It's disgusting in my opinion.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:02 PM   #25 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post

All of those I am quite capable of spending money on myself. Indeed, I could do it better.
********, there's the strong possibility that all of them would be massively underfunded, unless you could raise equivalent amounts of money from the population voluntarily.
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:04 PM   #26 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
Westcountryman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Westcountry.
Posts: 5,922
Party: None
Westcountryman is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpdavies View Post
Local areas would need to identify who was commiting the crime and punish them suitably.
Which is nearly impossible. Hey, get the underfunded Police to do it.

Which raises an interesting question, are we going to go back to a system where those who did not pay for fire cover get to watch their houses burn etc?
__________________
Manus haec inimica tyrannis ense petit placidam sub libertate quietam - "This hand of mine, which is hostile to tyrants, seeks by the sword quiet peace under liberty."
Westcountryman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:07 PM   #27 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
A libertarian would let an orphan starve and die unless someone agreed to take them in. It's disgusting in my opinion.


How do you know what a Libertarian would do? Don't be such a *******. Just because a Libertarian doesn't believe in stealing, doesn't mean he/she would watch another person suffer through no fault of their own. How did you become so hateful towards other people?

Quote:
********, there's the strong possibility that all of them would be massively underfunded, unless you could raise equivalent amounts of money from the population voluntarily.


You're the one talking ******** pal. If you think people can't work together to acheive things without government, then you are sadly deluded. That fact this delusion has led you to thinking stealing and fascism is the right course of action is quite disgusting really.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:10 PM   #28 (permalink)
Uber Member
 
mkpdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woking
Posts: 30,604
mkpdavies has some supporters
Send a message via MSN to mkpdavies Send a message via Skype™ to mkpdavies
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eurosceptic Atlanticist View Post
Which is nearly impossible. Hey, get the underfunded Police to do it.

Which raises an interesting question, are we going to go back to a system where those who did not pay for fire cover get to watch their houses burn etc?
Depends if they deserve to not be able to afford it. In a free society, where people had to be responisble, there would be less people like that to start with.

The ones that truly deserve help, would probably be happy to find their richer, more giving neigbours would donate more to charity and help their deserving neighbours much more readily.

What they wouldn't do is steal from someone else to help them, as you advocate.
__________________
http://brits4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
http://wokinglibertarians.blogspot.com/
http://lpuk.org

My ignore list

Labour, Blue Labour, Lib Dems
mkpdavies is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:42 PM   #29 (permalink)
Member
 
Cleopatra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 257
Cleopatra is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Connor View Post
It's easy. If they don't want their rubbish taking away, they don't pay to have it taken away and it must remain on their property until they dispose of it via legal means (i.e. at the tip).
And if they don't leave it on their property which will be more likely, what do you suggest then?
__________________
"Then they pull down their filthy trousers, squat over a massive, subsidised ditch and evacuate their corrupt, socialist bowels all over a photograph of Shakespeare."
Cleopatra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-02-2008, 05:47 PM   #30 (permalink)
Member
 
Cleopatra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 257
Cleopatra is just starting out
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Connor View Post
Oops, missed that bit.

I know a bloke in Texas who has his rubbish taken away by a private company. $20 a year, no limit, collections three times per week.

Yes, you read that correctly. $20 a year.
Interesting, he must be one very lucky Texan:

City of Burnet Texas | City Deparments: Utilites: Garbage Rates



Residential Refuse Collection Rates

Contractor will provide curbside collection service of residential refuse and waste to each Residential Unit as follows:

STANDARD RESIDENTIAL RATES: Rates are quoted at a per month rate.

One time per week - One 90-gallon cart
Base Rate $ 11.90
Billing Charge 2.00
Total Rate $ 13.90

One time per week - Two 90-gallon carts
Base Rate 14.60
Billing Charge 2.00
Total Rate $ 16.60

SENIOR CITIZEN RATES: (Over age 65) Rates are quoted at a per month rate.

One time per week - One 90-gallon cart
Base Rate $ 10.29
Billing Charge 2.00
Total Rate $ 12.29

One time per week - Two 90-gallon carts
Base Rate 12.99
Billing Charge 2.00
Total Rate 14.99

Additional carts will be made available for an additional monthly charge of $2.50 per cart added to the Base Rate, subject to the Contractor Service Cost Adjustment in accordance with Sec. 90-66 of Ordinance 2004-19.

65-GALLON CART: (Upon special request for customers physically unable to use the 90-gallon carts). Rates are quoted at a per month rate.

One time per week - One 65-gallon cart
Base Rate $ 10.29
Billing Charge 2.00
Total Rate $ 12.29

One time per week - Two 65-gallon carts
Base Rate 12.99
Billing Charge 2.00
Total Rate 14.99

Additional carts will be made available for an additional monthly charge of $2.50 per cart added to the Base Rate, subject to the Contractor Service Cost Adjustment in accordance with Sec. 90-66 of this ordinance.

Such service shall be provided by the use of 90-gallon cart containers supplied by the Contractor. The prices includes the curbside collection of up to five (5) additional containers, bags and bundles of residential refuse on each pickup/service day. Where multiple Residential Units occupy a single location, the Customer will be billed for each Residential Unit. Contractor will provide house side collections at no extra cost to citizens that are handicapped or disabled. Determination for citizens requesting this service shall be made between Contractor and the City.



If I was from the City of Burnet in Texas I would be hopping mad that your Texan friend paid only $20 per year. I find it very difficult to believe if I'm honest.

If we are talking Britain then we could pretty much treble that amount quoted as $13.90 per month.
__________________
"Then they pull down their filthy trousers, squat over a massive, subsidised ditch and evacuate their corrupt, socialist bowels all over a photograph of Shakespeare."
Cleopatra is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!FuzzFizz It!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This site is owned and operated by MyCartel Limited © 2007. Hosting: BookFizz.
This site supports Label My Food and Politigg
My latest commercial site: Cell Phone News 2.0 - [Mobile version]

Mobile version

Politishop

eXTReMe Tracker
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0